The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
User's only contributions to any project other than a few edits in 2018 are to upload selfies and write an autobiography on his Commons user page. WP:NOTHERE The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This image has no source or authorship information. While the subject died over 100 years ago, without a source, there's no way we can keep this. While unlikely, it could be a modern illustration, could be inaccurate identification, etc. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC #1 (No free equivalent), as it's being used to illustrate the article on the game's genre, and there are several freely licensed game screeshots that can replace it. Also fails NFCC #8 as the image itself isn't the subject of critical commentary. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
More than 1 non-free poster, does not follow #3a of non-free content usage policy. Regards. Titodutta ( talk) 14:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
At first, I thought about shortening the video clip to no more than thirty seconds per
WP:NFCC#3b. However, I'm unsure whether even shortening would make the clip of the opening sequence of
The Simpsons Movie more acceptable because
WP:NFC#Unacceptable use discourages using video clips unless reliably sourced commentary can suffice the justification of the usage. Furthermore, per
WP:NFCCEG, even when the clip might comply with
WP:NFCC, especially "contextual significance" (#8), a file may still be unacceptable, especially when the commentary in the accompanying text
is unsourced. The page "
The Simpsons opening sequence#The Simpsons Movie and callback" easily describes what the video depicts, and I think most readers can already grasp what the section describes without watching the video. That could be the argument that the clip fails criterion #8 and
WP:NFC#CS. I'm honestly unsure whether deleting the video clip can make any difference or affect the understanding of the series's bunch of opening sequences, like the
live-action one from "
Homer Simpson, This Is Your Wife", conveyed by the article itself, which is tagged for issues, like sourcing and in-universe perspective.
George Ho (
talk) 20:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
User's only contributions to any project other than a few edits in 2018 are to upload selfies and write an autobiography on his Commons user page. WP:NOTHERE The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This image has no source or authorship information. While the subject died over 100 years ago, without a source, there's no way we can keep this. While unlikely, it could be a modern illustration, could be inaccurate identification, etc. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC #1 (No free equivalent), as it's being used to illustrate the article on the game's genre, and there are several freely licensed game screeshots that can replace it. Also fails NFCC #8 as the image itself isn't the subject of critical commentary. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 08:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
More than 1 non-free poster, does not follow #3a of non-free content usage policy. Regards. Titodutta ( talk) 14:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
At first, I thought about shortening the video clip to no more than thirty seconds per
WP:NFCC#3b. However, I'm unsure whether even shortening would make the clip of the opening sequence of
The Simpsons Movie more acceptable because
WP:NFC#Unacceptable use discourages using video clips unless reliably sourced commentary can suffice the justification of the usage. Furthermore, per
WP:NFCCEG, even when the clip might comply with
WP:NFCC, especially "contextual significance" (#8), a file may still be unacceptable, especially when the commentary in the accompanying text
is unsourced. The page "
The Simpsons opening sequence#The Simpsons Movie and callback" easily describes what the video depicts, and I think most readers can already grasp what the section describes without watching the video. That could be the argument that the clip fails criterion #8 and
WP:NFC#CS. I'm honestly unsure whether deleting the video clip can make any difference or affect the understanding of the series's bunch of opening sequences, like the
live-action one from "
Homer Simpson, This Is Your Wife", conveyed by the article itself, which is tagged for issues, like sourcing and in-universe perspective.
George Ho (
talk) 20:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)