The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 April 1. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 April 1. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't think this meets Microsoft's permission criteria, or our non-free content criteria. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. This provides no discernible enhancement of the article's content and seems to have only been inserted as an ear treat for fans. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 04:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to {{
PD-ineligible-USonly}}
-
FASTILY
01:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
I think this file is in the public domain as it is below WP:TOO. funplussmart ( talk) 02:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Procedural close, already deleted by Fastily (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Already non-free media in the article--this isn't adding anything educational. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by Walk Like an Egyptian with the reason "useless and is only being used in a user's sandbox; can use File:Chris Lee Hawaii.jpg instead" FASTILY 07:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free - FASTILY 01:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Licensed as "own work", however it is a logo from a company 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 22:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned and no encyclopedic value 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 22:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
not used in the main space" and "
no encyclopedic value" were valid reasons, we'd have deleted the entire Wikilove programme a long time ago. Ask yourselves why not. The answer turns out to be that images used to illustrate friendly comments given by one editor to another also have value, albeit non-encyclopedic. It also turns out that some images are used intermittently: seasonally perhaps, or for special occasions, or simply not very often. So testing whether an image is in use today is no guide to whether it may be in use tomorrow, or the day after. What we have to weigh up is whether freeing up the 21 kB of server space used to store the image is a bigger gain to the encyclopedia than the value of the comradeship engendered by being able to use the image on a greetings card given by one editor to another – even if that happens rarely. My opinion is that it's not. YMMV -- RexxS ( talk) 02:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 April 1. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 April 1. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't think this meets Microsoft's permission criteria, or our non-free content criteria. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle ( talk) 23:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. This provides no discernible enhancement of the article's content and seems to have only been inserted as an ear treat for fans. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 04:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to {{
PD-ineligible-USonly}}
-
FASTILY
01:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
I think this file is in the public domain as it is below WP:TOO. funplussmart ( talk) 02:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Procedural close, already deleted by Fastily (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Already non-free media in the article--this isn't adding anything educational. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by Walk Like an Egyptian with the reason "useless and is only being used in a user's sandbox; can use File:Chris Lee Hawaii.jpg instead" FASTILY 07:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free - FASTILY 01:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Licensed as "own work", however it is a logo from a company 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 22:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned and no encyclopedic value 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 22:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
not used in the main space" and "
no encyclopedic value" were valid reasons, we'd have deleted the entire Wikilove programme a long time ago. Ask yourselves why not. The answer turns out to be that images used to illustrate friendly comments given by one editor to another also have value, albeit non-encyclopedic. It also turns out that some images are used intermittently: seasonally perhaps, or for special occasions, or simply not very often. So testing whether an image is in use today is no guide to whether it may be in use tomorrow, or the day after. What we have to weigh up is whether freeing up the 21 kB of server space used to store the image is a bigger gain to the encyclopedia than the value of the comradeship engendered by being able to use the image on a greetings card given by one editor to another – even if that happens rarely. My opinion is that it's not. YMMV -- RexxS ( talk) 02:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)