The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 31. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq ( talk) 17:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq ( talk) 17:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Banknotes are not created by Wikipedia users but by governments/central banks. No evidence of permission from the issuing government/central bank. Stefan2 ( talk) 10:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, needs clearer soucing, authorship ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo design is not necessarily uploaders to relicense. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as self but Logo design for third party. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Non trival third party logo, and external source given, How is this a self work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, how is this a self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third pary logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
This was apparently uploaded under a self license, but would seem to be an official Pakistan govt document. Are these copyright free? The license needs updating in any event ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, how is the self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Sign is an artwork with a seperate copyright, this cannot be solely a self license. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 31. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq ( talk) 17:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq ( talk) 17:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Banknotes are not created by Wikipedia users but by governments/central banks. No evidence of permission from the issuing government/central bank. Stefan2 ( talk) 10:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, needs clearer soucing, authorship ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo design is not necessarily uploaders to relicense. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as self but Logo design for third party. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Non trival third party logo, and external source given, How is this a self work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, how is this a self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third pary logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
This was apparently uploaded under a self license, but would seem to be an official Pakistan govt document. Are these copyright free? The license needs updating in any event ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo design, how is the self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 23:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Sign is an artwork with a seperate copyright, this cannot be solely a self license. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)