- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:General Kotikalapudi Venkata Krishna Rao.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adamgerber80 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced by free version c:File:General Kotikalapudi Venkata Krishna Rao.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:General Om Prakash Malhotra.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adamgerber80 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced by free version c:File:General Om Prakash Malhotra.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Azraq Oasis c. 1913.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LTHK76 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. File would have no obvious value being hosted on Commons, plus the source of the file is not mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value and watermark ruins the image. Salavat ( talk) 12:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:I impact India first campaign.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ArnabKumarSaha ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any mainspace article ( User:ArnabKumarSaha/I Impact India contains content for a potential article) and is best used on Commons. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete along with the userpage. User:ArnabKumarSaha/I Impact India was created in midst of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Impact India to circumvent deletion. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Cami Bradley AGT audition.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ATS ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
reULed with correct name ATS ( talk) 06:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Believe – Cami Bradley AGT.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ATS ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 06:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Strengthened. — ATS ( talk) 08:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - the image itself is not the object of significant sourced commentary. The fact that she perfomed on Got Talent is described in the text. It's usage is essentially decorative. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Removed from article. Researching further the policy that seems to change every FUC-ing time I turn around (😏), I see this actually fails NFCI #5. The image should now be deleted as orphaned. — ATS ( talk) 21:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 16. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:People's beach1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Universal Orlando Globe.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GC05 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free use The globe is a sculpture in the US, so Freedom of Panorama applies. The article is not about the globe itself, rendering its needed non-free license void. Elisfkc ( talk) 14:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Convert to CC-BY-SA 4.0. No need for this discussion, WP:SOFIXIT. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Um, sure that in the US FoP applies to a sculpture?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It's still a sculpture, and not valid for CC license. The article already has a non-free logo in the infobox, this fails WP:NFCCP3a Ronhjones (Talk) 16:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
-
User:Finnusertop, where did you get the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence from? From what I can see, neither the sculptor nor the photographer has provided a licence. Also, without a licence from the photographer, this fails
WP:FREER. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
12:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Stefan2, I'm pretty sure it was marked CC-BY-SA 4.0 by the uploader before it was deleted. It was also using erroneously the NFC tag/rationale templates alongside the CC tag. Deleting admin: Explicit: how was this file licensed when you deleted? – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 13:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. For future reference, tag large files with {{ Non-free reduce}}. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:American Association for the Advancement of Science.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blob5824 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Not a low-resolution image, so it violates WP:NFCC#3. RockMagnetist( talk) 21:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Reduce nominal size as necessary . This is standard practice for non-free SVGs, and not a reason for deletion. —
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
13:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- There
already is a reduced file.
RockMagnetist(
talk)
18:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's not a reduced file, that's a different filetype. Per
WP:IUP#FORMAT if we've got the SVG, we should be using it. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
01:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeNumber: O.k. Can you point me to the guidelines that say how large an SVG file should be and how to reduce it? RockMagnetist( talk) 15:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's not a reduced file, that's a different filetype. Per
WP:IUP#FORMAT if we've got the SVG, we should be using it. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
01:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- There
already is a reduced file.
RockMagnetist(
talk)
18:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 07:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:2014.03.29.west.hollywood.elementary.school.970.n.hammond.st.90069.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File is also hosted on Commons; local file was tagged with {{ keep local}}. Despite this, the rationale is more than insufficient - it is based on the assumption that Commons will be shut down by the FBI due to hosting pornography. hiàn/Editing on mobile account. 14:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, rationale to keep local copy is pretty poor. Salavat ( talk) 00:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The image's author has requested that it not be stored at Commons. The author's express wishes should be sufficient reason not to delete. No good reason has been provided why the image should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing in
WP:F8 that requires a sufficient rationale. It states clearly there that an image can ONLY be deleted if
The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
Nothing at all in there about sufficiency of rationales. The marking is explicitly a sufficient rationale not to delete. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 17:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Maybe move to a shorter name. Interqwark talk contribs 22:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:2014.04.05.mark.twain.middle.school.mar.vista.los.angeles.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File is also hosted on Commons; local file was tagged with {{ keep local}}. Despite this, the rationale is more than insufficient - it is based on the assumption that Commons will be shut down by the FBI due to hosting pornography. See history for more information. Hiàn ( talk/Editing on mobile account.) 14:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, rationale to keep local copy is pretty poor. Salavat ( talk) 00:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The image's author has requested that it not be stored at Commons. The author's express wishes should be sufficient reason not to delete. No good reason has been provided why the image should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing in
WP:F8 that requires a sufficient rationale. It states clearly there that an image can ONLY be deleted if
The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
Nothing at all in there about sufficiency of rationales. The marking is explicitly a sufficient rationale not to delete. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 17:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Deleting this ancient draft should be asked for at WP:MFD Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Image Makers Asia (logo).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Charineeimagebkk ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+discussion%2F2018+June+8%23File%3AImage+Makers+Asia+%28logo%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Only used on long abandoned userspace sandbox, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 20:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No use expected. Possibly a promotional image upload. -- DBig Xray 17:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Either the file and sandbox should both be deleted or both should be kept, not different outcomes for each. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Dishonored 2 Corvo vs Emily Gameplay.webm ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cognissonance ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Videos for fair use need to be 10% of the original size and low resolution. Not all the original in HD Ronhjones (Talk) 21:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- If it needs to be "10% of the original size and low resolution", can't you just reupload the file? Cognissonance ( talk) 22:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete — Long, non-free ad/trailer. Not needed for the context of the article. If kept, it would have to be resized. Interqwark talk contribs 22:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Michael Jackson's Perfumer.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RevengeOfTheRobots ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Likely flickrwashing of the license. The image is from a Flickr account whose photostream consist of only this one photograph uploaded 6 June 2018. Image was previously used in a blog from 2011. See this blog archive. Claim of public domain licensing is questionable. Whpq ( talk) 22:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- Agree with nominator's assessment. A professional photographer has a Flickr account with a single public domain photo? I don't think so. The uploader has had recent uploads of this subject( File:Perfumer of Jackon.png and File:Perfumer of Jackon's.png) deleted as clear copyright violations. This appears to be more deception. I have blocked the uploader for persistent copyright violation and disruptive editing. — CactusWriter (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:General Kotikalapudi Venkata Krishna Rao.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adamgerber80 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced by free version c:File:General Kotikalapudi Venkata Krishna Rao.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:General Om Prakash Malhotra.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adamgerber80 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced by free version c:File:General Om Prakash Malhotra.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Azraq Oasis c. 1913.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LTHK76 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. File would have no obvious value being hosted on Commons, plus the source of the file is not mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value and watermark ruins the image. Salavat ( talk) 12:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:I impact India first campaign.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ArnabKumarSaha ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any mainspace article ( User:ArnabKumarSaha/I Impact India contains content for a potential article) and is best used on Commons. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete along with the userpage. User:ArnabKumarSaha/I Impact India was created in midst of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Impact India to circumvent deletion. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Cami Bradley AGT audition.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ATS ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
reULed with correct name ATS ( talk) 06:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Believe – Cami Bradley AGT.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ATS ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 06:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Strengthened. — ATS ( talk) 08:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - the image itself is not the object of significant sourced commentary. The fact that she perfomed on Got Talent is described in the text. It's usage is essentially decorative. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Removed from article. Researching further the policy that seems to change every FUC-ing time I turn around (😏), I see this actually fails NFCI #5. The image should now be deleted as orphaned. — ATS ( talk) 21:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 16. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:People's beach1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Universal Orlando Globe.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GC05 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free use The globe is a sculpture in the US, so Freedom of Panorama applies. The article is not about the globe itself, rendering its needed non-free license void. Elisfkc ( talk) 14:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Convert to CC-BY-SA 4.0. No need for this discussion, WP:SOFIXIT. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Um, sure that in the US FoP applies to a sculpture?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It's still a sculpture, and not valid for CC license. The article already has a non-free logo in the infobox, this fails WP:NFCCP3a Ronhjones (Talk) 16:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
-
User:Finnusertop, where did you get the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence from? From what I can see, neither the sculptor nor the photographer has provided a licence. Also, without a licence from the photographer, this fails
WP:FREER. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
12:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Stefan2, I'm pretty sure it was marked CC-BY-SA 4.0 by the uploader before it was deleted. It was also using erroneously the NFC tag/rationale templates alongside the CC tag. Deleting admin: Explicit: how was this file licensed when you deleted? – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 13:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. For future reference, tag large files with {{ Non-free reduce}}. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:American Association for the Advancement of Science.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blob5824 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Not a low-resolution image, so it violates WP:NFCC#3. RockMagnetist( talk) 21:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Reduce nominal size as necessary . This is standard practice for non-free SVGs, and not a reason for deletion. —
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
13:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- There
already is a reduced file.
RockMagnetist(
talk)
18:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's not a reduced file, that's a different filetype. Per
WP:IUP#FORMAT if we've got the SVG, we should be using it. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
01:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeNumber: O.k. Can you point me to the guidelines that say how large an SVG file should be and how to reduce it? RockMagnetist( talk) 15:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- That's not a reduced file, that's a different filetype. Per
WP:IUP#FORMAT if we've got the SVG, we should be using it. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
talk)
01:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- There
already is a reduced file.
RockMagnetist(
talk)
18:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 07:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:2014.03.29.west.hollywood.elementary.school.970.n.hammond.st.90069.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File is also hosted on Commons; local file was tagged with {{ keep local}}. Despite this, the rationale is more than insufficient - it is based on the assumption that Commons will be shut down by the FBI due to hosting pornography. hiàn/Editing on mobile account. 14:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, rationale to keep local copy is pretty poor. Salavat ( talk) 00:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The image's author has requested that it not be stored at Commons. The author's express wishes should be sufficient reason not to delete. No good reason has been provided why the image should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing in
WP:F8 that requires a sufficient rationale. It states clearly there that an image can ONLY be deleted if
The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
Nothing at all in there about sufficiency of rationales. The marking is explicitly a sufficient rationale not to delete. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 17:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Maybe move to a shorter name. Interqwark talk contribs 22:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:2014.04.05.mark.twain.middle.school.mar.vista.los.angeles.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File is also hosted on Commons; local file was tagged with {{ keep local}}. Despite this, the rationale is more than insufficient - it is based on the assumption that Commons will be shut down by the FBI due to hosting pornography. See history for more information. Hiàn ( talk/Editing on mobile account.) 14:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, rationale to keep local copy is pretty poor. Salavat ( talk) 00:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The image's author has requested that it not be stored at Commons. The author's express wishes should be sufficient reason not to delete. No good reason has been provided why the image should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing in
WP:F8 that requires a sufficient rationale. It states clearly there that an image can ONLY be deleted if
The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}.
Nothing at all in there about sufficiency of rationales. The marking is explicitly a sufficient rationale not to delete. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 17:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Deleting this ancient draft should be asked for at WP:MFD Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Image Makers Asia (logo).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Charineeimagebkk ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Only used on long abandoned userspace sandbox, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 20:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No use expected. Possibly a promotional image upload. -- DBig Xray 17:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Either the file and sandbox should both be deleted or both should be kept, not different outcomes for each. ℯ xplicit 00:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Dishonored 2 Corvo vs Emily Gameplay.webm ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cognissonance ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Videos for fair use need to be 10% of the original size and low resolution. Not all the original in HD Ronhjones (Talk) 21:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- If it needs to be "10% of the original size and low resolution", can't you just reupload the file? Cognissonance ( talk) 22:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete — Long, non-free ad/trailer. Not needed for the context of the article. If kept, it would have to be resized. Interqwark talk contribs 22:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Michael Jackson's Perfumer.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RevengeOfTheRobots ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Likely flickrwashing of the license. The image is from a Flickr account whose photostream consist of only this one photograph uploaded 6 June 2018. Image was previously used in a blog from 2011. See this blog archive. Claim of public domain licensing is questionable. Whpq ( talk) 22:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- Agree with nominator's assessment. A professional photographer has a Flickr account with a single public domain photo? I don't think so. The uploader has had recent uploads of this subject( File:Perfumer of Jackon.png and File:Perfumer of Jackon's.png) deleted as clear copyright violations. This appears to be more deception. I have blocked the uploader for persistent copyright violation and disruptive editing. — CactusWriter (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.