The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused, derivative of non-free content (artwork) FASTILY 08:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused, derivative of non-free content (artwork) FASTILY 08:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
screenshot from a television interview, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 10:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 6#File:St._Ann's_plaque2.JPG}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
File is marked do not move to commons, but it may have expired in it's original country in 2014? If so it should be on Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture ( in the source) is published under CC-BY-NC license - incompatible license with Wikipedia. XXN, 15:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 15:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Tim Tam Slam.JPG. XXN, 15:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, the book may have expired in the UK (1929+70) and the US (its pre 1923.). However the work itself lists no other credit for the image, (except possibly The Railway Gazette.). ... At the very least it is possibly PD-US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
As stated, 'Current sourcing requirements were not in force at the time of upload.' However, this photo presumably dates from around 2000, so it can't be public domain by virtue of copyright expiration as stated, and it is more likely to be a work of the Arizona state government than the US federal government. This image doesn't seem essential to the article, but perhaps it qualifies for non-free use. — innotata 17:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original flickr picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 20:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear authorship. The source photo is unavailable anymore to verify the license. XXN, 20:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 20:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn, the licenses in question were synchronized. XXN, 11:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 21:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 21:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Mislicensed non-free logo. Possibly attempt of Flickrwash for the first file version. XXN, 21:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Excessive watermarking. Unusable, out of project scope. XXN, 21:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
questionable copyright status. Available for free online, but that does not mean it is licensed BSD. FASTILY 22:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused, derivative of non-free content (artwork) FASTILY 08:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused, derivative of non-free content (artwork) FASTILY 08:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
screenshot from a television interview, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 10:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 6#File:St._Ann's_plaque2.JPG}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
File is marked do not move to commons, but it may have expired in it's original country in 2014? If so it should be on Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 March 8. czar 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture ( in the source) is published under CC-BY-NC license - incompatible license with Wikipedia. XXN, 15:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 15:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Tim Tam Slam.JPG. XXN, 15:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, the book may have expired in the UK (1929+70) and the US (its pre 1923.). However the work itself lists no other credit for the image, (except possibly The Railway Gazette.). ... At the very least it is possibly PD-US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
As stated, 'Current sourcing requirements were not in force at the time of upload.' However, this photo presumably dates from around 2000, so it can't be public domain by virtue of copyright expiration as stated, and it is more likely to be a work of the Arizona state government than the US federal government. This image doesn't seem essential to the article, but perhaps it qualifies for non-free use. — innotata 17:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original flickr picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 20:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear authorship. The source photo is unavailable anymore to verify the license. XXN, 20:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 20:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn, the licenses in question were synchronized. XXN, 11:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 21:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The original picture isn't available under a CC license, but is copyrighted - ©All rights reserved. Lincensing conflict. XXN, 21:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Mislicensed non-free logo. Possibly attempt of Flickrwash for the first file version. XXN, 21:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Excessive watermarking. Unusable, out of project scope. XXN, 21:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
questionable copyright status. Available for free online, but that does not mean it is licensed BSD. FASTILY 22:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)