The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 August 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 05:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image was added for use in the article No One (Game of Thrones), but when the same user nominated the page for GA status User:Miyagawa told them that the image needed to go because of its poor fair use rationale. AffeL complied initially, then a few minutes after the page was promoted logged into the sock account User:PeterD12 and readded the image. There was already "consensus" on the GAN to remove the image, even if one of the parties was lying (read:with the image in the article, the GAN was effectively null and void), so I have now reremoved the image. It is not currently used anywhere on the project, and this situation is unlikely to change. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 06:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The comic book cover is used in the Other appearances section of Jabberjaw accompanying the sentence "He also appeared in Hanna-Barbera Presents: Superstar Olympics (issue #6) published by Archie Comics in 1996 and Cartoon Network Presents (issue #23) published by DC Comics in 1999." The image has two fair use rationales. One states that the comic book cover is used "For identification purposes in conjunction with discussion of the topic of the article.", but this is incorrect since the topic of the article is the television show and not the comic book and there is already the title card in the infobox identifying the television show. The second states the comic book cover is used "Illustration of a specific point within the article." which is half of a sentence. Readers do not need a comic book cover in an article to know that it exists since the text already states that.
The comic book cover fails WP:NFCC#1 since the text "He also appeared in Hanna-Barbera Presents: Superstar Olympics (issue #6) published by Archie Comics in 1996 and Cartoon Network Presents (issue #23) published by DC Comics in 1999." is sufficient to describe that the comic book exists without the cover being present, WP:NFCC#3a in that there is a screenshot in the infobox for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects ( talk) 08:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The comic book cover is used in the Other appearances section of The Great Grape Ape Show accompanying the sentence "Grape Ape had his own short-lived comic book series called The Great Grape Ape that ran 2 issues in September and November 1976 published by Charlton Comics." The image has two fair use rationales. One states that the comic book cover is used "For identification purposes in conjunction with discussion of the topic of the article.", but this is incorrect since the topic of the article is the television show and not the comic book and there is already the title card in the infobox identifying the television show. The second states the comic book cover is used "Illustration of a specific point within the article." which is one sentence. Readers do not need a comic book cover in an article to know that it exists since the text already states that.
The comic book cover fails WP:NFCC#1 since the text "Grape Ape had his own short-lived comic book series called The Great Grape Ape that ran 2 issues in September and November 1976 published by Charlton Comics." is sufficient to describe that the comic book exists without the cover being present, WP:NFCC#3a in that there is a screenshot in the infobox for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects ( talk) 08:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Nature of img suggests it is likely a screenshot from a newscast, but file description (falsely) claims it is a free img (to the extent of my knowledge screenshots and/or visual content of Philippines newscasts are always copyright and not freely licenced nor in public domain). JWilz12345 ( talk) 12:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-free photo of a newspaper article used in Cheney Clow article fails WP:NFCC#1. The fact that one of the descendants was married 67 years is adequately described with text and does not require a non-free image of a newspaper article to understand that. Whpq ( talk) 12:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photography really is free. The rationale from the file page (Quote: "SINCE THE NEWSPAPER'S PUBLICATION OF THIS PHOTOGRAPHY WAS FOR OFFICIAL USE IT'S IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN") is wrong (not anything which was published for official use is in the public domain). XXN, 13:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously wrong license tag – Train2104 ( t • c) 13:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of a template map. Can we use the template itself instead? – Train2104 ( t • c) 13:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately the permission for use is unverifiable :( XXN, 14:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 August 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 05:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
In source page was stated "Members of the media may download these high-resolution images for use in publication." But the license wasn't specified and we are not sure under which conditions is ok to publish and use this photo. XXN, 15:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
possible derivative of non-free content (statue). Note that the image itself also appears to be a scan of another image (i.e. this is a derivative of a derivative work?!) FASTILY 23:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
unused in mainspace, low-res, missing verifiable source, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
dubious self-work claim, numerous tineye hits FASTILY 23:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 August 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 05:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image was added for use in the article No One (Game of Thrones), but when the same user nominated the page for GA status User:Miyagawa told them that the image needed to go because of its poor fair use rationale. AffeL complied initially, then a few minutes after the page was promoted logged into the sock account User:PeterD12 and readded the image. There was already "consensus" on the GAN to remove the image, even if one of the parties was lying (read:with the image in the article, the GAN was effectively null and void), so I have now reremoved the image. It is not currently used anywhere on the project, and this situation is unlikely to change. Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 06:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The comic book cover is used in the Other appearances section of Jabberjaw accompanying the sentence "He also appeared in Hanna-Barbera Presents: Superstar Olympics (issue #6) published by Archie Comics in 1996 and Cartoon Network Presents (issue #23) published by DC Comics in 1999." The image has two fair use rationales. One states that the comic book cover is used "For identification purposes in conjunction with discussion of the topic of the article.", but this is incorrect since the topic of the article is the television show and not the comic book and there is already the title card in the infobox identifying the television show. The second states the comic book cover is used "Illustration of a specific point within the article." which is half of a sentence. Readers do not need a comic book cover in an article to know that it exists since the text already states that.
The comic book cover fails WP:NFCC#1 since the text "He also appeared in Hanna-Barbera Presents: Superstar Olympics (issue #6) published by Archie Comics in 1996 and Cartoon Network Presents (issue #23) published by DC Comics in 1999." is sufficient to describe that the comic book exists without the cover being present, WP:NFCC#3a in that there is a screenshot in the infobox for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects ( talk) 08:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The comic book cover is used in the Other appearances section of The Great Grape Ape Show accompanying the sentence "Grape Ape had his own short-lived comic book series called The Great Grape Ape that ran 2 issues in September and November 1976 published by Charlton Comics." The image has two fair use rationales. One states that the comic book cover is used "For identification purposes in conjunction with discussion of the topic of the article.", but this is incorrect since the topic of the article is the television show and not the comic book and there is already the title card in the infobox identifying the television show. The second states the comic book cover is used "Illustration of a specific point within the article." which is one sentence. Readers do not need a comic book cover in an article to know that it exists since the text already states that.
The comic book cover fails WP:NFCC#1 since the text "Grape Ape had his own short-lived comic book series called The Great Grape Ape that ran 2 issues in September and November 1976 published by Charlton Comics." is sufficient to describe that the comic book exists without the cover being present, WP:NFCC#3a in that there is a screenshot in the infobox for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects ( talk) 08:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Nature of img suggests it is likely a screenshot from a newscast, but file description (falsely) claims it is a free img (to the extent of my knowledge screenshots and/or visual content of Philippines newscasts are always copyright and not freely licenced nor in public domain). JWilz12345 ( talk) 12:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-free photo of a newspaper article used in Cheney Clow article fails WP:NFCC#1. The fact that one of the descendants was married 67 years is adequately described with text and does not require a non-free image of a newspaper article to understand that. Whpq ( talk) 12:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photography really is free. The rationale from the file page (Quote: "SINCE THE NEWSPAPER'S PUBLICATION OF THIS PHOTOGRAPHY WAS FOR OFFICIAL USE IT'S IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN") is wrong (not anything which was published for official use is in the public domain). XXN, 13:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously wrong license tag – Train2104 ( t • c) 13:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of a template map. Can we use the template itself instead? – Train2104 ( t • c) 13:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately the permission for use is unverifiable :( XXN, 14:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 August 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 05:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
In source page was stated "Members of the media may download these high-resolution images for use in publication." But the license wasn't specified and we are not sure under which conditions is ok to publish and use this photo. XXN, 15:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
possible derivative of non-free content (statue). Note that the image itself also appears to be a scan of another image (i.e. this is a derivative of a derivative work?!) FASTILY 23:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
unused in mainspace, low-res, missing verifiable source, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
dubious self-work claim, numerous tineye hits FASTILY 23:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)