April 3
File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fabrigo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Beszedessculpture.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Beszedessculpture.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beszedessculpture.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Order of the Red Banner 1.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Order of the Red Banner 1.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Seryo93 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Order of the Red Banner.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fhrancis Lopez.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Fhrancis Lopez.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhoven Sulla ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Uploader's claim of being the copyright holder is dubious. This image is found in a few other places on the internet like http://photosofmen.blogspot.ca/2012/08/fhrancis-oliver-lopez-when-he-was.html and uploder has made the same claim of copyright for another image which is a clear copyright violation. Whpq ( talk) 03:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sam Powell-Pepper, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Sam Powell-Pepper, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Brett Eddy, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Brett Eddy, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Paddy Ryder, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Paddy Ryder, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Aaron Young, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Aaron Young, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Jackson Trengove, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Jackson Trengove, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ollie Wines, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Ollie Wines, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:2017 spb metro.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Obvious F7 delete (sourced to AFP/Getty). I'm not even sure why this was actually being debated. Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:2017 spb metro.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FriyMan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image can be replaced by File:Saint-Pétersbourg - Métro - Technologichesky metrostation - IMG 3174.jpg (and as far as I'm aware we don't accept images like this unless they've been released under a Commons license?), Ofcourse I'm incorrect I'll happily withdraw, Thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 20:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- I asked
Mjroots before uploading and he said that the file meets WP:NFCC. So I uploaded it. It is not a good idea to replace it with the file we previously used, because it does not show the attack or the outcomes of it. Cheers,
FriyMan
talk 20:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- With respect, the suggested replacement does not show the effects of the attack. Apart from the livery identifying the system, it could be any metro train anywhere in the world. IMHO, the non-free image has sufficient encyclopedic value that it should be allowed.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- All train/metro liveries etc are unique around the world and it's clearly obvious the other image was taken at the Russian station, Also we don't need images of the attacks etc etc unless their released under a commons license which this obviously isn't, Anyway the file has since been CSD'd as a copyvio. –
Davey2010
Talk 20:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it was CSD'd AT COMMONS as a copyvio, and quite correctly too. Use on en-Wiki under NFCC rules is a different matter.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about that
but it's a copyvio here aswell, Go to 2017 Westminster attack and tell me where you see an image of said incident ?, Exactly you don't because there's nothing licensed under CC at the moment and far as I know the same applies here,– Davey2010 Talk 20:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)- It is not a copyright violation here on the English Wikipedia. However, because the image is from a commercial image agency (AP/Getty), it does not meet all of the
non-free content criteria. See
WP:F7 which specifically states that non-free images from agencies such as AP and Getty are eligible for immediate deletion. --
Whpq (
talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Why can't
WP:IAR be applied?
Mjroots (
talk) 21:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Because it would severely hamper other claims of fair use. In this case NFCC criteria 1 and 3-9 are met (I presume 10 is met but I haven't checked, and it's the easiest to correct if it isn't), however criterion 2 is not met as illustrating contemporary news and other articles about the attacks is how the news agencies make their money. If people can see the same image on Wikipedia then fewer newspapers, etc will pay to use the image, our use would therefore harm the copyright holder's commercial opportunities. My understanding is that this is one of the criteria that is most strongly linked to the requirements of fair use in copyright law, if so it is one of the least legally safe to ingore. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Why can't
WP:IAR be applied?
Mjroots (
talk) 21:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- It is not a copyright violation here on the English Wikipedia. However, because the image is from a commercial image agency (AP/Getty), it does not meet all of the
non-free content criteria. See
WP:F7 which specifically states that non-free images from agencies such as AP and Getty are eligible for immediate deletion. --
Whpq (
talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about that
- Yes, it was CSD'd AT COMMONS as a copyvio, and quite correctly too. Use on en-Wiki under NFCC rules is a different matter.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- All train/metro liveries etc are unique around the world and it's clearly obvious the other image was taken at the Russian station, Also we don't need images of the attacks etc etc unless their released under a commons license which this obviously isn't, Anyway the file has since been CSD'd as a copyvio. –
Davey2010
Talk 20:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- With respect, the suggested replacement does not show the effects of the attack. Apart from the livery identifying the system, it could be any metro train anywhere in the world. IMHO, the non-free image has sufficient encyclopedic value that it should be allowed.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Elizabeth LaPensée.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Majora ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Elizabeth LaPensée.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hjames01 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This may be Flickrwashing. I'm not sure. The EXIF data clearly says the copyright holder is Trish Tunney and that All Rights Reserved. I emailed Ms. Tunney and am waiting for a reply. If they have authorized the Flickr upload I will close this myself. Otherwise without clarification we can't be sure this is properly licensed. Majora ( talk) 21:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Received an email back from Ms. Tunney confirming that they authorized this photo to be posted to Flickr. As promised, I'm withdrawing this. -- Majora ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 3
File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fabrigo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:FredBrunishAtDesk.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Beszedessculpture.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Beszedessculpture.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beszedessculpture.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Order of the Red Banner 1.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Order of the Red Banner 1.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Seryo93 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Order of the Red Banner.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fhrancis Lopez.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Fhrancis Lopez.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhoven Sulla ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Uploader's claim of being the copyright holder is dubious. This image is found in a few other places on the internet like http://photosofmen.blogspot.ca/2012/08/fhrancis-oliver-lopez-when-he-was.html and uploder has made the same claim of copyright for another image which is a clear copyright violation. Whpq ( talk) 03:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sam Powell-Pepper, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Sam Powell-Pepper, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Brett Eddy, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Brett Eddy, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Paddy Ryder, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Paddy Ryder, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Aaron Young, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Aaron Young, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Jackson Trengove, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Jackson Trengove, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ollie Wines, April 2017.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Ollie Wines, April 2017.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thejoebloggsblog ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious self work claim, low resolution, likely video screenshot – Train2104 ( t • c) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:2017 spb metro.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Obvious F7 delete (sourced to AFP/Getty). I'm not even sure why this was actually being debated. Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:2017 spb metro.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FriyMan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image can be replaced by File:Saint-Pétersbourg - Métro - Technologichesky metrostation - IMG 3174.jpg (and as far as I'm aware we don't accept images like this unless they've been released under a Commons license?), Ofcourse I'm incorrect I'll happily withdraw, Thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 20:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- I asked
Mjroots before uploading and he said that the file meets WP:NFCC. So I uploaded it. It is not a good idea to replace it with the file we previously used, because it does not show the attack or the outcomes of it. Cheers,
FriyMan
talk 20:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- With respect, the suggested replacement does not show the effects of the attack. Apart from the livery identifying the system, it could be any metro train anywhere in the world. IMHO, the non-free image has sufficient encyclopedic value that it should be allowed.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- All train/metro liveries etc are unique around the world and it's clearly obvious the other image was taken at the Russian station, Also we don't need images of the attacks etc etc unless their released under a commons license which this obviously isn't, Anyway the file has since been CSD'd as a copyvio. –
Davey2010
Talk 20:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it was CSD'd AT COMMONS as a copyvio, and quite correctly too. Use on en-Wiki under NFCC rules is a different matter.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about that
but it's a copyvio here aswell, Go to 2017 Westminster attack and tell me where you see an image of said incident ?, Exactly you don't because there's nothing licensed under CC at the moment and far as I know the same applies here,– Davey2010 Talk 20:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)- It is not a copyright violation here on the English Wikipedia. However, because the image is from a commercial image agency (AP/Getty), it does not meet all of the
non-free content criteria. See
WP:F7 which specifically states that non-free images from agencies such as AP and Getty are eligible for immediate deletion. --
Whpq (
talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Why can't
WP:IAR be applied?
Mjroots (
talk) 21:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Because it would severely hamper other claims of fair use. In this case NFCC criteria 1 and 3-9 are met (I presume 10 is met but I haven't checked, and it's the easiest to correct if it isn't), however criterion 2 is not met as illustrating contemporary news and other articles about the attacks is how the news agencies make their money. If people can see the same image on Wikipedia then fewer newspapers, etc will pay to use the image, our use would therefore harm the copyright holder's commercial opportunities. My understanding is that this is one of the criteria that is most strongly linked to the requirements of fair use in copyright law, if so it is one of the least legally safe to ingore. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Why can't
WP:IAR be applied?
Mjroots (
talk) 21:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- It is not a copyright violation here on the English Wikipedia. However, because the image is from a commercial image agency (AP/Getty), it does not meet all of the
non-free content criteria. See
WP:F7 which specifically states that non-free images from agencies such as AP and Getty are eligible for immediate deletion. --
Whpq (
talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about that
- Yes, it was CSD'd AT COMMONS as a copyvio, and quite correctly too. Use on en-Wiki under NFCC rules is a different matter.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- All train/metro liveries etc are unique around the world and it's clearly obvious the other image was taken at the Russian station, Also we don't need images of the attacks etc etc unless their released under a commons license which this obviously isn't, Anyway the file has since been CSD'd as a copyvio. –
Davey2010
Talk 20:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- With respect, the suggested replacement does not show the effects of the attack. Apart from the livery identifying the system, it could be any metro train anywhere in the world. IMHO, the non-free image has sufficient encyclopedic value that it should be allowed.
Mjroots (
talk) 20:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Elizabeth LaPensée.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Majora ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- File:Elizabeth LaPensée.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hjames01 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This may be Flickrwashing. I'm not sure. The EXIF data clearly says the copyright holder is Trish Tunney and that All Rights Reserved. I emailed Ms. Tunney and am waiting for a reply. If they have authorized the Flickr upload I will close this myself. Otherwise without clarification we can't be sure this is properly licensed. Majora ( talk) 21:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Received an email back from Ms. Tunney confirming that they authorized this photo to be posted to Flickr. As promised, I'm withdrawing this. -- Majora ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.