The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The Christmas logo for KOST-FM is unnecessary. There is already File:KOST FM 2013.png. Shall we do this every Christmas holidays? George Ho ( talk) 01:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Adamson, unlikely to ever be used or to serve any educational purpose. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The image within the book may not be freely available. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.” On the work of Johan Grimonprez.jpeg. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted sprites. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
Non-free computer icon}}
, but would Keep as non-free content either way. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
Leave a message) 04:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
File page states that "Original picture by Lazybatusu", which shows no obvious connection with the uploader. Can't speedy as no evidence of permission given the age of upload. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: If date is accurate, renewal would be pre-1978, and thus not avaliable on the copyright.gov site. Keeping and assuming no renewal was filed, or no notice. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Assuming good faith, on the part of the uploader, but does someone want to check for a possible renewal? ( unlikely). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect identity, obsolete, orphan. I found this photograph on 14 September 2004 when I was having a private viewing at a museum of a scrapbook and photograph album that were compiled by Robert Lambart Dunville (1893-1931). Robert Lambart Dunville was the older brother of John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917), and I assumed that this photograph was of John Spencer Dunville. The museum photocopied the photograph for me and when I returned home I scanned the photocopy. Later I uploaded the photograph to a family history website that I run, to the page http://www.dumville.org/photo_pages/jd1896_pho.html and labelled it as John Spencer Dunville. I assume that the photograph was downloaded from my web page or from Google Images and uploaded to Wikipedia. On 1 November 2016 I showed the photograph to the Assistant Curator of the Household Cavalry Museum at Combermere Barracks in Windsor. He said the cap badge was not for the regiment in which John Spencer Dunville served, the 1st (Royal) Dragoons, but for the regiment in which his brother Robert Lambart Dunville served. I believe the cap badge is for the Grenadier Guards. The youngest brother of Robert Lambart Dunville, William Gustavus Dunville (1900-1956) also served in the Grenadier Guards, and so the photograph could be of Robert Lambart Dunville or William Gustavus Dunville, but it is most probably not of John Spencer Dunville VC, as claimed by the name of the photograph. No pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file, and I am not aware of any pages anywhere else that link to this file. I have uploaded a correct image of John Spencer Dunville VC to Wikipedia Commons: John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917).jpg. I would be grateful if John_Dunville_VC.jpg could be deleted from Wikipedia. BwanaHewa ( talk) 09:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep as fair use czar 17:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Not so sure this logo is below TOO as claimed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Technically unsourced, but FFD rather than CSD given age of image. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Technically unsourced, but FFD over CSD as image is clearly old. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Source added. IljaWeber ( talk) 12:13, 28 November 2016 (CET)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a third party logo, so I am querying the CC license. File is unused so conversion to fair-use can't be advanced immediately. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Library Level 4 Painting.JPG Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 17:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:E4a Painting Wall.JPG Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 17:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, so not seeing why this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, so I fail to see how this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 24#File:CNBC_TV18_logo.png}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, CC license but NFUR given. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The Christmas logo for KOST-FM is unnecessary. There is already File:KOST FM 2013.png. Shall we do this every Christmas holidays? George Ho ( talk) 01:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Adamson, unlikely to ever be used or to serve any educational purpose. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The image within the book may not be freely available. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.” On the work of Johan Grimonprez.jpeg. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted sprites. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
Non-free computer icon}}
, but would Keep as non-free content either way. --
AntiCompositeNumber (
Leave a message) 04:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
File page states that "Original picture by Lazybatusu", which shows no obvious connection with the uploader. Can't speedy as no evidence of permission given the age of upload. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: If date is accurate, renewal would be pre-1978, and thus not avaliable on the copyright.gov site. Keeping and assuming no renewal was filed, or no notice. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Assuming good faith, on the part of the uploader, but does someone want to check for a possible renewal? ( unlikely). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect identity, obsolete, orphan. I found this photograph on 14 September 2004 when I was having a private viewing at a museum of a scrapbook and photograph album that were compiled by Robert Lambart Dunville (1893-1931). Robert Lambart Dunville was the older brother of John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917), and I assumed that this photograph was of John Spencer Dunville. The museum photocopied the photograph for me and when I returned home I scanned the photocopy. Later I uploaded the photograph to a family history website that I run, to the page http://www.dumville.org/photo_pages/jd1896_pho.html and labelled it as John Spencer Dunville. I assume that the photograph was downloaded from my web page or from Google Images and uploaded to Wikipedia. On 1 November 2016 I showed the photograph to the Assistant Curator of the Household Cavalry Museum at Combermere Barracks in Windsor. He said the cap badge was not for the regiment in which John Spencer Dunville served, the 1st (Royal) Dragoons, but for the regiment in which his brother Robert Lambart Dunville served. I believe the cap badge is for the Grenadier Guards. The youngest brother of Robert Lambart Dunville, William Gustavus Dunville (1900-1956) also served in the Grenadier Guards, and so the photograph could be of Robert Lambart Dunville or William Gustavus Dunville, but it is most probably not of John Spencer Dunville VC, as claimed by the name of the photograph. No pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file, and I am not aware of any pages anywhere else that link to this file. I have uploaded a correct image of John Spencer Dunville VC to Wikipedia Commons: John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917).jpg. I would be grateful if John_Dunville_VC.jpg could be deleted from Wikipedia. BwanaHewa ( talk) 09:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep as fair use czar 17:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Not so sure this logo is below TOO as claimed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Technically unsourced, but FFD rather than CSD given age of image. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Technically unsourced, but FFD over CSD as image is clearly old. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Source added. IljaWeber ( talk) 12:13, 28 November 2016 (CET)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a third party logo, so I am querying the CC license. File is unused so conversion to fair-use can't be advanced immediately. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Library Level 4 Painting.JPG Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 17:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:E4a Painting Wall.JPG Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 17:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, so not seeing why this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, so I fail to see how this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 24#File:CNBC_TV18_logo.png}}
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, CC license but NFUR given. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)