The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Nehemiah Program logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NewYorkActuary ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This violates WP:NFCC#8 in Nehemiah Corporation of America as it is not a logo for Nehemiah Corporation of America but for The Nehemiah Program. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. I am the uploader of this file, which depicts the registered trademark of a now-defunct financial program. It appears in the article in the section that devotes substantial discussion to the program. Criterion #8 has been met here, because inclusion of the image significantly increases understanding of the financial program by serving as its primary means of visual identification. This is especially relevant given that there have been several homeowner-related programs in the United States (both in the past and present) that go by the name "Nehemiah Program" or the similar-sounding "Nehemiah Project", none of which are related to the program being discussed in the article. Inclusion of the trademark for this particular Nehemiah Program is essential in helping the readers know that they have reached the correct article. And because the program was a distinct legal entity, inclusion of its trademark adds understanding (via visual identification) that would not be achieved simply by adding the logo of the umbrella corporation that sponsored the program. Furthermore, the article's discussion of the program is sufficiently detailed so as to permit, in theory, the spinning off of that section into a stand-alone article, at which point inclusion of the trademark would not raise any issues. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • This is not an article about a programme, so if they try to reach an article about the programme, they have not reached the correct article when they spot this logo. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC) reply

It's not quite as simple as that. Readers can easily reach the article via the Search function, as illustrated here. And to illustrate the 'real world' potential for confusion, a similar search on Bing (shown here) displays the name of the Nehemiah Corporation, but also displays many other unrelated programs of similar name. Considering that much of the article documents the challenges made against the Program by various U.S. federal agencies, including a finding by the Internal Revenue Service that donations to the Program were not tax-deductible, the need to provide visual identification of this particular program (whose logo is not used by any of the similar-named programs) takes on an importance not often seen in 'typical' Wikipedia articles. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 19:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep:Agree with NewYorkActuary -- Pachisu124 ( talk) 19:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by BethNaught ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Yasirmturk thumb.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yasirmturk ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Author and subject of photo requested deletion via PROD, which I declined as inapplicable in file space. However, as the photo is of the user and probably was never used other than in his user space and further given that the user is (by his own userspace description) an unremarkable person, photo probably should be deleted per his request as it has no possible use, either on Wikipedia or on Commons. Safiel ( talk) 04:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Tagged for G7 speedy deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 11:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Bl.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RHaworth ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Somewhat of a test request: The file does currently (appropriately) have a "generic image name" default file and text but it also shadows commons:File:Bl.png which is likewise a "generic image name" default file, or rather a redirect to it. With this in mind, the local copy should be deleted as redundant (one cannot upload a new file over the Commons one, which displays the same content as ours) and to get it out of Category:Wikipedia files that shadow a file on Wikimedia Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 10:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Locally hosted placeholder images are generally inappropriate as they only hide the problem and also shows up in a number of maintenance categories. It is still possible to upload filenames with those names on Commons, causing confusion for uploaders and requiring action from us when our placeholder images suddenly are shadowed by Commons images. A better solution is to delete all local placeholder files and replace them by placeholders on Commons. In this case, we already have a placeholder on Commons, so there should be absolutely no need for this placeholder. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 11:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 26#File:Stand up (The Triffids song).jpg. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Stand up.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dan arndt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fairly sure that only coloured text is not original enough to make a copyrightable album cover. Seeing as Australia's copyrightability treshold is much lower than the US one (see the Australian Aboriginal Flag for an example), this should be relicensed as {{ PD-ineligible-USOnly}}. It may also be renamed as it's shadowing a Commons redirect but that can wait. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Change license to {{ PD-text}}. Letters alone are not protected by copyright. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Jalan.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abstrakt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The file is currently shadowing an almost identical Commons file, the local copy is probably unneeded. If the local copy is better than the Commons one, it should probably overwrite the Commons file. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Speedy delete per F8. I have made sure that the Commons version matches. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 19:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete all. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 15:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:File.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aquaman258 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Express.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RHaworth ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Image.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mdd4696 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Image.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Janke ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Image.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rd232 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Dance.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Home.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Company logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ronhjones ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Dot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Image.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ms2ger ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Cathedral.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

Follow up on a request farther up this page: There are a number of files that do currently (appropriately) have "generic image name" default files and text but also shadow Commons files which are also "generic image name" default files, or redirects to them. With this in mind, the local copies should be deleted/salted? as redundant (one cannot upload a new file over the Commons one, which displays the same content as ours) and to get them out of Category:Wikipedia files that shadow a file on Wikimedia Commons. See also Stefan2's rationale in the other request. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 13:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Micmac pater noster.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kwamikagami ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file is a lower quality (a bit blurrier and it's somewhat rotated) copy of the Commons file commons:File:Micmac pater noster.jpg which it is currently shadowing. I am wondering if it should be deleted as redundant lower quality copy and because the copyright status seems safe, or the shadowing fixed in some other way as Kwamikagami requested a local copy to be kept. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 14:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I agree the better image should be used. However, copyright status is never safe on Commons. I've modified free-use Commons png maps used on hundreds of WP articles (I just colored in countries or states) that have been deleted as copy-vio, despite there being nothing copyrightable about them. Best to never trust Commons and keep everything local. — kwami ( talk) 00:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Kwamikagami: Maybe it would be even better to ask for files that were deleted in error to be returned. (I have opinion regarding this particular entry). –  Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC) reply

That doesn't work. It takes months to get a file back, if you notice, but they don't notify you, just delete files seemingly at random. — kwami ( talk) 03:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC) reply

If you upload a file to Commons, then you get a notification on your talk page when/if it is nominated for deletion on Commons. If you have not received a talk page notification for a file, then it probably means that you were not the user who uploaded that file to Commons. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 12:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC) reply

I think the issue is that kwami is mainly active here on enWiki and won't see a deletion nomination on Commons from here. Other editors I've seen using {{ Keep local}} have given similar rationales, the need to follow two watchlists/notifications instead of just one. phab:T91192, phab:T5525 and phab:T3066 are related tasks. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete The file was uploaded to Commons in 2012, and the user who added the {{ keep local}} tag to Wikipedia has still not made any attempts to keeping the file synchronised at both projects. We can't keep outdated files around forever, and the user who added the {{ keep local}} tag shouldn't expect that other people will go through the trouble of spending time on keeping files synchronised. It's better to delete the local file so that we avoid this problem. The situation might have been different, had the {{ keep local}} tagger promptly ensured that the file was synchronised (that is, within a few weeks or so after the original upload in 2012). -- Stefan2 ( talk) 00:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The Commons' copy is neither better nor worse. It is just slightly different. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Front.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Henning Sivertsen ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file currently shadows commons:File:Front.JPG, which is an actually legit image. Further, the local copy is completely unused and unnecessary given that upload protection exists. I suggest that the local file be deleted and replaced with an upload protection to prevent people from uploading here. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Still from Movie Naagara Haavu.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KiranAN123 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The article already has a non-free image. Fails WP:NFCC#8 — Vensatry _(Talk) 16:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Vishnuvardhan Stamp.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KiranAN123 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The article already has a non-free image. Fails WP:NFCC#8 — Vensatry _(Talk) 16:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete: non-free stamps are not supposed to be used to just decorate articles. The fact that this stamp was issued with this subject's image is already well stated in prose, so without some critical commentary about the stamp itself, there is no reason to have it there at all. Anyway it fails WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFC#Images #3. ww2censor ( talk) 18:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:LipscombBisons.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Msutigger ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned PD image. 🍀 Corkythe hornetfan 🍀 19:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn due to edit conflict Codename Lisa ( talk) 19:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Jj6.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low-resolution unused image of somewhere unexplained. Absence of description and source means it cannot go to Commons and it cannot be potentially used anywhere on Wikipedia. Codename Lisa ( talk) 19:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Codename Lisa: Um, it seems like you tagged the file just as I was moving it... Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete and salt. — ξ ^xplicit 04:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Big.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Green.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Images.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryuuzaki ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:One.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

File:Drink.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by B ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

As discussed in the first section with this name, all these are redundant to the Commons files they shadow. Salting (upload protecting) local filenames is a better way of handling local bad filenames. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Hi. If I have understood correctly, you are saying that edit-protected placeholder files with the same name are on Commons already and we don't need to waste bits and bytes locally. Sure. Why not? That's a clever nomination. The nomination help reduce the arbitrary unresolvable backlog from Category:Wikipedia files that shadow a file on Wikimedia Commons. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 20:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete These placeholder images do not fill any purpose since there are also placeholder images on Commons. Also see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 5#File:Drink.jpg where I listed a placeholder redirect which shadows a placeholder redirect on Commons. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Gen. Manuel Tinio.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Electromagnetictop ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obviously not own work of the uploader, as the subject of the photo died in 1924. We don't have any source information and I can't find any versions online that pre-date the upload to en.wiki (2009). — Diannaa ( talk) 20:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This is clearly a half-tone image scanned later on. The assertion of "I created this work entirely by myself" is suspicious. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep (non-admin closure). The reason for nominating the file has now been addressed, thank you XPanettaa. Cloudbound ( talk) 16:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC) reply

File:RTÉ Radio 1.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AxG ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Looks like an uncontroversial nomination. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I've added this image on the other versions field of these images that looks very similar to this one, so it clearly is in use. XPanettaa ( talk) 08:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Barbara Lawrence.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Avy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free file beong used in Barbara Lawrence. File has a non-free use rationale, but I don't see how this particualr usage satisfies WP:NFCC. A freely licensed file ( File:Barbara Lawrence in Man in the Shadow.jpg) is already being used in the infobox so a non-free image is not needed for identification purposes per WP:NFCC#1; morevoer, the non-free image itself does not seem to be the subject of any sourced commentary with in the article so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking. Suggest Delete, unless the non-free use can be better justified to the degree that omitting the image would be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete, as this is clearly Replaceable by a free version that serves equivalent purpose (visual identification of subject). --Animalparty! ( talk) 07:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep File:Football Federation of Sri Lanka logo.jpg in Football Federation of Sri Lanka only, delete File:Sri Lanka FA.png. — ξ ^xplicit 00:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Football Federation of Sri Lanka logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Price Zero ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Sri Lanka FA.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dryazan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

Non-free logos being used in Sri Lanka national football team, Sri Lanka women's national football team and Football Federation of Sri Lanka respectively. Each file has a non-free use rationale, but the source link provided for "Football Federation of Sri Lanka logo.jpg" shows it as being the logo of the Football Federation of Sri Lanka, which means usage in the team articles does not seem to comply with No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. This FIFA page and the federation's official Facebook page also show the logo as being the FFSL logo. "Football Federation of Sri Lanka". however, is using "File:Sri Lanka FA.png". There is no source link given, but the logo can be seen on this AFC page and this Twitter account. Just for reference, the Twitter account links to the federation's website, but the website doesn't link to the Twitter account; so, I'm not sure it's an official Twitter account. The federation's website and the Facebook page do link to each other.

If "Football Federation of Sri Lanka logo.jpg" is the current logo being used by the federation, I suggest it be added to "Football Federation of Sri Lanka" (a non-free use rationale is also needed), remove from the two individual team articles, and delete for "File:Sri Lanka FA.png" as a former logo, unless it can somehow be incorporated into the federation's article in a way that satisfies WP:NFCC.

If "File:Sri Lanka FA.png" is the current logo being used by the federation, then I suggest keep for "Football Federation of Sri Lanka" and (possibly) delete for "Football Federation of Sri Lanka logo.jpg", unless it can be shown that the logo is specific to one of the teams and that the consensus is that it's usage satisfies WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.