The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete,Orphan Page now uses score-tags to show music. Akurn ( talk) 06:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative of copyrighted character. Kelly hi! 08:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a damaged version of File:Netop logo.png, which is under a PS-simple style license. It would be appreciated if a decision about which image to retain could be reached. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as self, but previously published at Historical Marker dataBase (HMdB.org). Clarification from uploader desirable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
I am the editor who published the photo in both the HMdb.org website and Wikipedia. I am the one who took the photo and posted it to both places. I even noted on the Wiki page that I used it on HMdb.org. Not sure where I am supposed to respond to the discussion? User:hoteltwo 13:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of 2D map design by third party. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Querying why this is non-free as the equivalent at Commons was considered 'simple' following a deletion request. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC) I added this image over 6 years ago. I have no understanding of this classification. -- Mespinola ( talk) 04:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Referral on the grounds that if this an image in support of an article about a living person, it's replaceable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8, not detrimental in removal for understanding of article as nothing about the sample is discussed in the article. — IB [ Poke ] 10:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Just a blurry picture that is of no use. MorbidEntree - ( Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 11:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 23:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Used in user space, but has 2 licenses, one less restrictive, which one is accurate? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: rmv duplicate license czar 23:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
2 licenses, which is correct? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, low resolution. We have clearer images at Commons:Category:St Andrews Castle. Kelly hi! 13:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope here - It had a "historic" license however it's a selfie of the uploader so the historic license doesn't apply, Thanks – Davey2010 Talk 13:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, low resolution. We have clearer photos at Commons:Category:St Giles' Church, Carburton. Kelly hi! 14:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, blurry. We have better photos at Commons:Category:Church of the Assumption (North Marston). Kelly hi! 15:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
2 licenses, which is correct? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
See WP:NFC#UUI - image of still-living person. Violates NFCC#1 Эlcobbola talk 18:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
See WP:NFC#UUI - image of still-living person. Violates NFCC#1 Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 23:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Cropped version of an image deleted in 2005. Can someone read the sourcing authorship of the deleted image and confirm the cropped version is OK? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 20:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Used only in userspace, lo res, 16 col (seeing dithering.). has watermark... I don't think this image is very useful. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, which would need a seperate license from the uploaders photo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: move to Commons czar 23:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned PD image; non sense in saving it since it's been replaced by a PNG version. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 20:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete,Orphan Page now uses score-tags to show music. Akurn ( talk) 06:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative of copyrighted character. Kelly hi! 08:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a damaged version of File:Netop logo.png, which is under a PS-simple style license. It would be appreciated if a decision about which image to retain could be reached. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as self, but previously published at Historical Marker dataBase (HMdB.org). Clarification from uploader desirable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
I am the editor who published the photo in both the HMdb.org website and Wikipedia. I am the one who took the photo and posted it to both places. I even noted on the Wiki page that I used it on HMdb.org. Not sure where I am supposed to respond to the discussion? User:hoteltwo 13:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of 2D map design by third party. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Querying why this is non-free as the equivalent at Commons was considered 'simple' following a deletion request. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC) I added this image over 6 years ago. I have no understanding of this classification. -- Mespinola ( talk) 04:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Referral on the grounds that if this an image in support of an article about a living person, it's replaceable. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8, not detrimental in removal for understanding of article as nothing about the sample is discussed in the article. — IB [ Poke ] 10:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Just a blurry picture that is of no use. MorbidEntree - ( Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 11:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 23:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Used in user space, but has 2 licenses, one less restrictive, which one is accurate? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: rmv duplicate license czar 23:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
2 licenses, which is correct? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, low resolution. We have clearer images at Commons:Category:St Andrews Castle. Kelly hi! 13:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope here - It had a "historic" license however it's a selfie of the uploader so the historic license doesn't apply, Thanks – Davey2010 Talk 13:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, low resolution. We have clearer photos at Commons:Category:St Giles' Church, Carburton. Kelly hi! 14:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unused, blurry. We have better photos at Commons:Category:Church of the Assumption (North Marston). Kelly hi! 15:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
2 licenses, which is correct? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
See WP:NFC#UUI - image of still-living person. Violates NFCC#1 Эlcobbola talk 18:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
See WP:NFC#UUI - image of still-living person. Violates NFCC#1 Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 23:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Cropped version of an image deleted in 2005. Can someone read the sourcing authorship of the deleted image and confirm the cropped version is OK? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 20:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Used only in userspace, lo res, 16 col (seeing dithering.). has watermark... I don't think this image is very useful. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo, which would need a seperate license from the uploaders photo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: move to Commons czar 23:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned PD image; non sense in saving it since it's been replaced by a PNG version. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 20:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)