The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: .png deleted Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Two non-free versions of essentially the same file. Both files are not needed per WP:NFCC#3 and I don't believe it's possible for these to be converted to a free license. The svg file is being used in Surinamese Football Association. The file has a non-free use rationale which seems to comply with WP:NFCC. The file was also being used in SVB Hoofdklasse, but I removed it because it lacked the separate, specific non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c and I don't believe a valid rationale can be written for that particular usage.
The png file is being used in two articles: Suriname national football team and Suriname women's national football team. The file has sort of has a non-free use rationale for each usage, but I don't think the combining of multiple usages into a single rationale complies with WP:NFCC#10c. I also don't feel a valid rationale can be written for each usage because of No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The png file is the older of the two, but it has been tagged with {{ Should be SVG}} so I am assuming that is the preferred format.
I suggest keep for the svg file and delete for the png file. Also, suggest that mention be made that non-free usage of the svg version is only considered NFCC compliant for the association's article and not any of the individual team articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: .png deleted Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Two non-free versions of essentially the same file. Both files are not needed per WP:NFCC#3 and I don't believe it's possible for these to be converted to a free license. The svg file is being used in Surinamese Football Association. The file has a non-free use rationale which seems to comply with WP:NFCC. The file was also being used in SVB Hoofdklasse, but I removed it because it lacked the separate, specific non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c and I don't believe a valid rationale can be written for that particular usage.
The png file is being used in two articles: Suriname national football team and Suriname women's national football team. The file has sort of has a non-free use rationale for each usage, but I don't think the combining of multiple usages into a single rationale complies with WP:NFCC#10c. I also don't feel a valid rationale can be written for each usage because of No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The png file is the older of the two, but it has been tagged with {{ Should be SVG}} so I am assuming that is the preferred format.
I suggest keep for the svg file and delete for the png file. Also, suggest that mention be made that non-free usage of the svg version is only considered NFCC compliant for the association's article and not any of the individual team articles. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)