The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned, too small to be of encyclopedic use, photo is a derivative work of the copyrighted box designs. B ( talk) 03:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned, a very nice image of mints that we could consider moving to Commons, but I have no confidence that this is actually a user-authored image. The user's other photographic upload is not remotely of this caliber ... and this image looks like it probably came from a PDF brochure or something, based on the size and how the gradient isn't smooth. B ( talk) 03:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
"Author E. Pring", does that mean it is not self made? Web sized, no exif available. Deadstar ( talk) 15:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I looked into this a bit more, and the image is used here on Timebus Travel , whose website has other images by "E. Pring" with a with a copyright sign beside it - here for instance. I can't find this particular image though. If uploader was E. Pring, I would have expected a larger sized image, that's all. Deadstar ( talk) 13:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused image file (PNG format), replaced by JPEG format file. AusChartMan ( talk) 16:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused 2007 "art" picture, uploader name does not resemble author name "Dawn Rosa Cole" Deadstar ( talk) 16:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Image of a 1993 painting, painter Elito V. Circa, does not resemble uploader name. Deadstar ( talk) 16:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Apparently uploaded for article on Crazy Chris which has been deleted multiple times as non-notable. ★ Bigr Tex 18:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: DEleted - Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Violation of WP:NFCC#3a: there is no need for two pictures in the article. Also a violation of WP:NFCC#10a: it can't be the intention that you should have to look through all issues of a newspaper or all pictures in an archive to identify the source of the image. One image potentially also violates WP:NFC#UUI §7 and thus WP:NFCC#2: the picture is sourced to a newspaper, without further information given. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously taken from Google Street View (you can see the cursor!) without attribution. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: 2 deleted, 1 kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NFCC#3a. Only one of the images should be in the article, not all three of them. Therefore: delete two of the above images. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that photos such as File:JWC Lombardy Fischer.jpg is in the public domain because it was published in 1968 without copyright information (Jan 68 issue, p. 21). I think there was quite a bit of controversy about the copyright status of this photo. !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubba73 ( talk • contribs)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid FUR: it says "This is a logo owned by O'Higgins F.C. for O'Higgins F.C.." Not true: this picture contains several logos, not just one logo. Besides, the image fails WP:NFCC#3a: we do not need more than one logo in the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned, too small to be of encyclopedic use, photo is a derivative work of the copyrighted box designs. B ( talk) 03:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned, a very nice image of mints that we could consider moving to Commons, but I have no confidence that this is actually a user-authored image. The user's other photographic upload is not remotely of this caliber ... and this image looks like it probably came from a PDF brochure or something, based on the size and how the gradient isn't smooth. B ( talk) 03:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
"Author E. Pring", does that mean it is not self made? Web sized, no exif available. Deadstar ( talk) 15:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I looked into this a bit more, and the image is used here on Timebus Travel , whose website has other images by "E. Pring" with a with a copyright sign beside it - here for instance. I can't find this particular image though. If uploader was E. Pring, I would have expected a larger sized image, that's all. Deadstar ( talk) 13:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused image file (PNG format), replaced by JPEG format file. AusChartMan ( talk) 16:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused 2007 "art" picture, uploader name does not resemble author name "Dawn Rosa Cole" Deadstar ( talk) 16:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Image of a 1993 painting, painter Elito V. Circa, does not resemble uploader name. Deadstar ( talk) 16:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Apparently uploaded for article on Crazy Chris which has been deleted multiple times as non-notable. ★ Bigr Tex 18:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: DEleted - Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Violation of WP:NFCC#3a: there is no need for two pictures in the article. Also a violation of WP:NFCC#10a: it can't be the intention that you should have to look through all issues of a newspaper or all pictures in an archive to identify the source of the image. One image potentially also violates WP:NFC#UUI §7 and thus WP:NFCC#2: the picture is sourced to a newspaper, without further information given. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously taken from Google Street View (you can see the cursor!) without attribution. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: 2 deleted, 1 kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NFCC#3a. Only one of the images should be in the article, not all three of them. Therefore: delete two of the above images. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that photos such as File:JWC Lombardy Fischer.jpg is in the public domain because it was published in 1968 without copyright information (Jan 68 issue, p. 21). I think there was quite a bit of controversy about the copyright status of this photo. !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubba73 ( talk • contribs)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid FUR: it says "This is a logo owned by O'Higgins F.C. for O'Higgins F.C.." Not true: this picture contains several logos, not just one logo. Besides, the image fails WP:NFCC#3a: we do not need more than one logo in the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)