- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted (by uploader).
Nick (
talk)
08:46, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned unencyclopedic image that is a modified version of a file that was deleted at commons per
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Spam (food) due to copyright concerns. The only spam can that was retained was one in which the part of the packaging above the threshold of originality was pixelised.
Nick—
Contact/
Contribs
00:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- File:Italian dancer Guido Lauri at La Scala.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FGweb ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Clearly a poster. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder as claimed. Whpq ( talk) 00:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)` This image is subject to copyright. See http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/quarterback-trent-dilfer-of-the-seattle-seahawks-looks-to-news-photo/51901103 Hirolovesswords ( talk) 02:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- File:Loganlifeclock.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kaisershatner ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Logan's Run (film) against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted (by uploader).
Nick (
talk)
08:46, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned unencyclopedic image that is a modified version of a file that was deleted at commons per
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Spam (food) due to copyright concerns. The only spam can that was retained was one in which the part of the packaging above the threshold of originality was pixelised.
Nick—
Contact/
Contribs
00:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- File:Italian dancer Guido Lauri at La Scala.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FGweb ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Clearly a poster. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder as claimed. Whpq ( talk) 00:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)` This image is subject to copyright. See http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/quarterback-trent-dilfer-of-the-seattle-seahawks-looks-to-news-photo/51901103 Hirolovesswords ( talk) 02:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- File:Loganlifeclock.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kaisershatner ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Logan's Run (film) against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 23:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.