The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
1983 book cover, unlikely to be freely licensed Deadstar ( talk) 10:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file with dubious name and comments. Deadstar ( talk) 11:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Photo of modern artwork Deadstar ( talk) 12:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deletion requested by subject in ticket:2015011410016123; image not used in an article so subject's request appears reasonable. ukexpat ( talk) 19:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Kept - HDstockphoto includes a link to where they got the image from in the first place, and that is from here. HDstockphoto appears to just webscrape other's images that it has no rights to, including press other professional images - Peripitus (Talk) 10:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio; is a stock image at hdstockphoto.com and no indication of compatible licence for the image; see: http://www.hdstockphoto.com/photos/detail/latter-day-trumpet-at-byu-pep-rally-2998669.html — Asterisk * Splat → 19:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Source states: "Craig Nelson took this picture of Ensign Books in La Mesa, CA 2006" but there is no indication that either (1) User:Evets21 is Craig Nelson, or (2) User:Evets21 obtained the necessary rights from Craig Nelson to put the image in the Public Domain, as indicated in image description — Asterisk * Splat → 19:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
There's a claim this is somehow an historic image. But, the image does not depict the subject of the article, and is only relevant to the article because it depicts the grounds where the fan known as The Wealdstone Raider became famous. A free license image could readily replace the purpose of this image, which is to depict the grounds. There is otherwise nothing remarkable about the image, nor is the image discussed within the article in which it is used. Further, the rationale that exists on the image is faulty, with no reason given why it is not replaceable, and a claim that the purpose is " The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work." ...which it clearly is not. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
1983 book cover, unlikely to be freely licensed Deadstar ( talk) 10:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file with dubious name and comments. Deadstar ( talk) 11:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Photo of modern artwork Deadstar ( talk) 12:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deletion requested by subject in ticket:2015011410016123; image not used in an article so subject's request appears reasonable. ukexpat ( talk) 19:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Kept - HDstockphoto includes a link to where they got the image from in the first place, and that is from here. HDstockphoto appears to just webscrape other's images that it has no rights to, including press other professional images - Peripitus (Talk) 10:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio; is a stock image at hdstockphoto.com and no indication of compatible licence for the image; see: http://www.hdstockphoto.com/photos/detail/latter-day-trumpet-at-byu-pep-rally-2998669.html — Asterisk * Splat → 19:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Source states: "Craig Nelson took this picture of Ensign Books in La Mesa, CA 2006" but there is no indication that either (1) User:Evets21 is Craig Nelson, or (2) User:Evets21 obtained the necessary rights from Craig Nelson to put the image in the Public Domain, as indicated in image description — Asterisk * Splat → 19:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
There's a claim this is somehow an historic image. But, the image does not depict the subject of the article, and is only relevant to the article because it depicts the grounds where the fan known as The Wealdstone Raider became famous. A free license image could readily replace the purpose of this image, which is to depict the grounds. There is otherwise nothing remarkable about the image, nor is the image discussed within the article in which it is used. Further, the rationale that exists on the image is faulty, with no reason given why it is not replaceable, and a claim that the purpose is " The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work." ...which it clearly is not. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)