From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 4

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept in new reduced format - Peripitus (Talk) 12:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nagle ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This screenshot encompasses several non-free works, each belonging to several authors, which is itself a violation of WP:NFCC#3. However, per WP:NFCC#1, the entire image is redundant and words alone are enough to serve its very simple purpose. Codename Lisa ( talk) 07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Keep I don't see this at all. What "several non-free works"? It's a screenshot of one message from a single program. NFCC#3 does not apply. The image is not redundant because it is the only screenshot. So NFCC#1 does not apply. -- John Nagle ( talk) 18:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Cropped image to remove icons from Windows toolbar. The argument that "words alone can replace it" would apply to almost any image. John Nagle ( talk) 18:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Taskbar, not toolbar. And the latter is a far-from-truth argument that chiefly uploaders make. The main purpose of this image just to show one sentence among the non-free decoration. That sentence itself is copyright-free. In Wikipedia, one should learn to let go of non-free things; although I don't insist if don't wish to. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 06:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC) reply
It's useful to retain the image because the content is controversial and involves a matter of public interest. This is appropriate use of non-free content. John Nagle ( talk) 20:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Every article in Wikipedia is about a matter of public interest and all of them are expected to adhere to WP:NFCC. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 20:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep after every problematic elements were cropped out. It's certainly not replaceable with text alone. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M22locustincombat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:M22locustincombat.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skinny87 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file has been moved to Wikicommon by myself(link: [1]).So there is no need to reserve it in enwikipedia. パンツァー VI-II Fu7ラジオ留言於民國103年暨 10:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sacco vanzetti sculpture.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Sacco vanzetti sculpture.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rasputinfa ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is one of several photos by artist David Horvitz uploaded in his apparent 8 year attempt to disrupt Wikipedia by having photographs of himself (he is the figure in the right of the photo) uploaded in various places. Rasputinfa is his original account. He was later blocked as Superbrightidea and Albianmoonlight. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynn lee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Lynn lee.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rasputinfa ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor photo of no encyclopedic quality, uploaded by a user who has been actively disrupting Wikipedia as part of an art project. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 13:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WRWAC's Jim Baranski receiving 2013 Governor's Environmental Excellence Award.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:WRWAC's Jim Baranski receiving 2013 Governor's Environmental Excellence Award.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dados101 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8, shows a person receiving an award which is easily understood without the image. January ( talk) 18:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southwick House Postcard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT 19:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Request deletion of this image as a higher quality, identical image is posted at File: 041 Elm St Duckett House Smith College.jpg I am uploader of both. reply

WindingRoad ( talk) 18:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)WingdingRoad reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 4

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept in new reduced format - Peripitus (Talk) 12:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nagle ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This screenshot encompasses several non-free works, each belonging to several authors, which is itself a violation of WP:NFCC#3. However, per WP:NFCC#1, the entire image is redundant and words alone are enough to serve its very simple purpose. Codename Lisa ( talk) 07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Keep I don't see this at all. What "several non-free works"? It's a screenshot of one message from a single program. NFCC#3 does not apply. The image is not redundant because it is the only screenshot. So NFCC#1 does not apply. -- John Nagle ( talk) 18:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Cropped image to remove icons from Windows toolbar. The argument that "words alone can replace it" would apply to almost any image. John Nagle ( talk) 18:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Taskbar, not toolbar. And the latter is a far-from-truth argument that chiefly uploaders make. The main purpose of this image just to show one sentence among the non-free decoration. That sentence itself is copyright-free. In Wikipedia, one should learn to let go of non-free things; although I don't insist if don't wish to. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 06:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC) reply
It's useful to retain the image because the content is controversial and involves a matter of public interest. This is appropriate use of non-free content. John Nagle ( talk) 20:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Every article in Wikipedia is about a matter of public interest and all of them are expected to adhere to WP:NFCC. Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 20:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep after every problematic elements were cropped out. It's certainly not replaceable with text alone. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M22locustincombat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:M22locustincombat.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skinny87 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file has been moved to Wikicommon by myself(link: [1]).So there is no need to reserve it in enwikipedia. パンツァー VI-II Fu7ラジオ留言於民國103年暨 10:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sacco vanzetti sculpture.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Sacco vanzetti sculpture.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rasputinfa ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is one of several photos by artist David Horvitz uploaded in his apparent 8 year attempt to disrupt Wikipedia by having photographs of himself (he is the figure in the right of the photo) uploaded in various places. Rasputinfa is his original account. He was later blocked as Superbrightidea and Albianmoonlight. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynn lee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Lynn lee.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rasputinfa ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor photo of no encyclopedic quality, uploaded by a user who has been actively disrupting Wikipedia as part of an art project. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 13:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WRWAC's Jim Baranski receiving 2013 Governor's Environmental Excellence Award.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

File:WRWAC's Jim Baranski receiving 2013 Governor's Environmental Excellence Award.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dados101 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8, shows a person receiving an award which is easily understood without the image. January ( talk) 18:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southwick House Postcard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT 19:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Request deletion of this image as a higher quality, identical image is posted at File: 041 Elm St Duckett House Smith College.jpg I am uploader of both. reply

WindingRoad ( talk) 18:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)WingdingRoad reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook