| < February 5 | February 7 > |
|---|
February 6
File:Rikki-Tikki-Tavi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Rikki-Tikki-Tavi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jenblower ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC #1 and 8. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is in the public domain (as would be about the first thirty years of its publication history), so it doesn't make sense to use this cover from a later, non-free edition. Particularly not when that edition (an adapted, illustrated version) is not even mentioned in the article and there's no indication it's of particular historical importance. postdlf ( talk) 02:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Found this independently of the FfD and thought the same thing. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 06:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Edgar Barrier.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Edgar Barrier.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beryl reid fan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim that the image isn't replaceable. It's a photo of an American actor who died in 1964, and there are plenty of {{ PD-US-no notice}} and {{ PD-US-not renewed}} photos of Americans who were famous at that time. The uploader hasn't explained why no such images would exist of this person. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Illustration of nc2013 day 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by John Reaves ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Illustration of nc2013 day 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sibs1988 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10a. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Vietnam in 1972 Munich Summer Olympics.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Vietnam in 1972 Munich Summer Olympics.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Magicloveisintheair ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in two articles and WP:NFCC#10c in one. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- This is a video screenshot of rare footage depicting the former South Vietnamese Olympic team which no longer exists (ceased existence since 1975). Having this photo is crucial in depicting the Team visually, as it illustrated how Vietnam was represented at the Olympic Games before 1975 (before Vietnamese unification of communist North with capitalist South) and before the international diplomatic shift towards recognizing communist countries, such as China (instead of Taiwan), which the IOC followed suit. As well, it showed how the Team appeared when it existed. A simple
web engine search shows absolutely NO relevant results on South Vietnam Olympics (other than the 1 result leading to this Wikipedia file itself), because this is an historical team, not a currently-existent team. Rationale for usage is same for both articles.
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
07:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- There is no sourced critical discussion of the image in any of the articles in which it is used. See WP:NFCC#8. It also fails WP:NFCC#10c in two articles. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The image doesn't give any relevant information other than "they were there" at the opening ceremony Parade of Nations. It's just a man in a suit walking on a track with a flag behind a woman carrying a sign that says "Vietnam".
postdlf (
talk)
16:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the "Vietnam" sign and flag, represents the IOC's sole recognition of South Vietnam (
Republic of Vietnam) as the sole legitimate representative of Vietnam at the time, not recognizing communist
North Vietnam. This is reminiscent to how Taiwan (Republic of China) was recognized as the sole rep for China (not the communist People's Republic of China), and South Korea (Republic of Korea) instead of both North and South, at the IOC and other international bodies like the UN, before the international shift of diplomacy towards recognizing communist countries, and this photo is Vietnam's example of this. Of course there's little discussion on anything in each of the articles, because few editors edit it. And how can using this Olympic photo in
Vietnam at the 1972 Summer Olympics and
Vietnam at the Olympics a failure in NFCC 10 anyways?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
17:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For the reasons already given. The information for which you're using the picture is easily communicated by text alone, and seeing a picture of them in the Parade of Nations doesn't significantly increase a reader's understanding of that fact. So it fails
WP:NFCC#1 and
WP:NFCC#8.
postdlf (
talk)
17:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would need proof though. This photo helps fulfill that as a source. This photo definitely doesn't fail NFCC 1, see my first comment on its rarity and about South Vietnam Olympics having absolutely no image results. Could you please offer suggestions on how I can address the issues at hand?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The proof for their participation in 1972 would come from a citation to a reliable written source, and obviously there's going to be no shortage of that for such a big event as the Olympics. The image really adds nothing to that, particularly as you can't even tell when or where it was taken just from looking at it, nor does it tell us anything about what entity is marching under the banner of "Vietnam" (only that someone is). There are no ways to fix these issues for this particular image in order to make its use comply with non-free content policy.
postdlf (
talk)
18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regular web engine search only provides 2 websites saying what South Vietnam's medal results were and that's it. 2 websites and everything else is irrelevant. Where can I get sources when I add this international diplomacy item???
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For example, newspapers tend to write a lot of stuff about the Olympics. Try looking at 1972 newspapers. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 19:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- This image doesn't give the medal results, so what would that matter? All you're really proving is that your research skills need some work. Start with the sources listed at 1972 Summer Olympics medal table. And not just the online ones, though the full medal count from Munich (if that's what you're honestly interested in) is readily available at the official Olympic website. postdlf ( talk) 21:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regular web engine search only provides 2 websites saying what South Vietnam's medal results were and that's it. 2 websites and everything else is irrelevant. Where can I get sources when I add this international diplomacy item???
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The proof for their participation in 1972 would come from a citation to a reliable written source, and obviously there's going to be no shortage of that for such a big event as the Olympics. The image really adds nothing to that, particularly as you can't even tell when or where it was taken just from looking at it, nor does it tell us anything about what entity is marching under the banner of "Vietnam" (only that someone is). There are no ways to fix these issues for this particular image in order to make its use comply with non-free content policy.
postdlf (
talk)
18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would need proof though. This photo helps fulfill that as a source. This photo definitely doesn't fail NFCC 1, see my first comment on its rarity and about South Vietnam Olympics having absolutely no image results. Could you please offer suggestions on how I can address the issues at hand?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For the reasons already given. The information for which you're using the picture is easily communicated by text alone, and seeing a picture of them in the Parade of Nations doesn't significantly increase a reader's understanding of that fact. So it fails
WP:NFCC#1 and
WP:NFCC#8.
postdlf (
talk)
17:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the "Vietnam" sign and flag, represents the IOC's sole recognition of South Vietnam (
Republic of Vietnam) as the sole legitimate representative of Vietnam at the time, not recognizing communist
North Vietnam. This is reminiscent to how Taiwan (Republic of China) was recognized as the sole rep for China (not the communist People's Republic of China), and South Korea (Republic of Korea) instead of both North and South, at the IOC and other international bodies like the UN, before the international shift of diplomacy towards recognizing communist countries, and this photo is Vietnam's example of this. Of course there's little discussion on anything in each of the articles, because few editors edit it. And how can using this Olympic photo in
Vietnam at the 1972 Summer Olympics and
Vietnam at the Olympics a failure in NFCC 10 anyways?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
17:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and my above comments. postdlf ( talk) 18:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Vehemently Oppose, see my comments above. Magicloveisintheair ( talk) 18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block AU Intertitle.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block AU Intertitle.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mr.Television ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block 4 Houses Logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block 4 Houses Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wattlebird ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wattlebird ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hilary Duff - 4ever Hilary Duff DVD.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Hilary Duff - 4ever Hilary Duff DVD.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rlholden ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Redundant to File:Forever Hilary.png, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:AttilioPalatini.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Image is {{ PD-Italy}} .
- File:AttilioPalatini.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mgvongoeden ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim that the image isn't replaceable. All photos of the guy which were taken during his lifetime should be in the public domain in his country of residence. If they were additionally published during his lifetime, then the pictures should be in the public domain in the US too. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's an old picture, already posted in the Italian version of Wikipedia. I have nothing else to add. Mgvongoeden ( talk) 16:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:ASM convalescing in DouglasAZHospital Corbis.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:ASM convalescing in DouglasAZHospital Corbis.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SteamWiki ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Claimed to be both copyrighted and in the public domain at the same time. If copyrighted, then it fails WP:NFC#UUI §7. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll update it with correct tags for public domain etc. as published in papers in 1926. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteamWiki ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- UPDATE It can be removed as this page has been retagged and replaced by File:ASM_in_DouglasAZHospital.jpg.
- Thanks again SteamWiki ( talk) 03:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
| < February 5 | February 7 > |
|---|
February 6
File:Rikki-Tikki-Tavi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Rikki-Tikki-Tavi.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jenblower ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC #1 and 8. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is in the public domain (as would be about the first thirty years of its publication history), so it doesn't make sense to use this cover from a later, non-free edition. Particularly not when that edition (an adapted, illustrated version) is not even mentioned in the article and there's no indication it's of particular historical importance. postdlf ( talk) 02:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Found this independently of the FfD and thought the same thing. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 06:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Edgar Barrier.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Edgar Barrier.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beryl reid fan ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim that the image isn't replaceable. It's a photo of an American actor who died in 1964, and there are plenty of {{ PD-US-no notice}} and {{ PD-US-not renewed}} photos of Americans who were famous at that time. The uploader hasn't explained why no such images would exist of this person. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Illustration of nc2013 day 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by John Reaves ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Illustration of nc2013 day 1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sibs1988 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10a. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Vietnam in 1972 Munich Summer Olympics.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Vietnam in 1972 Munich Summer Olympics.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Magicloveisintheair ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in two articles and WP:NFCC#10c in one. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- This is a video screenshot of rare footage depicting the former South Vietnamese Olympic team which no longer exists (ceased existence since 1975). Having this photo is crucial in depicting the Team visually, as it illustrated how Vietnam was represented at the Olympic Games before 1975 (before Vietnamese unification of communist North with capitalist South) and before the international diplomatic shift towards recognizing communist countries, such as China (instead of Taiwan), which the IOC followed suit. As well, it showed how the Team appeared when it existed. A simple
web engine search shows absolutely NO relevant results on South Vietnam Olympics (other than the 1 result leading to this Wikipedia file itself), because this is an historical team, not a currently-existent team. Rationale for usage is same for both articles.
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
07:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- There is no sourced critical discussion of the image in any of the articles in which it is used. See WP:NFCC#8. It also fails WP:NFCC#10c in two articles. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The image doesn't give any relevant information other than "they were there" at the opening ceremony Parade of Nations. It's just a man in a suit walking on a track with a flag behind a woman carrying a sign that says "Vietnam".
postdlf (
talk)
16:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the "Vietnam" sign and flag, represents the IOC's sole recognition of South Vietnam (
Republic of Vietnam) as the sole legitimate representative of Vietnam at the time, not recognizing communist
North Vietnam. This is reminiscent to how Taiwan (Republic of China) was recognized as the sole rep for China (not the communist People's Republic of China), and South Korea (Republic of Korea) instead of both North and South, at the IOC and other international bodies like the UN, before the international shift of diplomacy towards recognizing communist countries, and this photo is Vietnam's example of this. Of course there's little discussion on anything in each of the articles, because few editors edit it. And how can using this Olympic photo in
Vietnam at the 1972 Summer Olympics and
Vietnam at the Olympics a failure in NFCC 10 anyways?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
17:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For the reasons already given. The information for which you're using the picture is easily communicated by text alone, and seeing a picture of them in the Parade of Nations doesn't significantly increase a reader's understanding of that fact. So it fails
WP:NFCC#1 and
WP:NFCC#8.
postdlf (
talk)
17:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would need proof though. This photo helps fulfill that as a source. This photo definitely doesn't fail NFCC 1, see my first comment on its rarity and about South Vietnam Olympics having absolutely no image results. Could you please offer suggestions on how I can address the issues at hand?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The proof for their participation in 1972 would come from a citation to a reliable written source, and obviously there's going to be no shortage of that for such a big event as the Olympics. The image really adds nothing to that, particularly as you can't even tell when or where it was taken just from looking at it, nor does it tell us anything about what entity is marching under the banner of "Vietnam" (only that someone is). There are no ways to fix these issues for this particular image in order to make its use comply with non-free content policy.
postdlf (
talk)
18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regular web engine search only provides 2 websites saying what South Vietnam's medal results were and that's it. 2 websites and everything else is irrelevant. Where can I get sources when I add this international diplomacy item???
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For example, newspapers tend to write a lot of stuff about the Olympics. Try looking at 1972 newspapers. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 19:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- This image doesn't give the medal results, so what would that matter? All you're really proving is that your research skills need some work. Start with the sources listed at 1972 Summer Olympics medal table. And not just the online ones, though the full medal count from Munich (if that's what you're honestly interested in) is readily available at the official Olympic website. postdlf ( talk) 21:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regular web engine search only provides 2 websites saying what South Vietnam's medal results were and that's it. 2 websites and everything else is irrelevant. Where can I get sources when I add this international diplomacy item???
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The proof for their participation in 1972 would come from a citation to a reliable written source, and obviously there's going to be no shortage of that for such a big event as the Olympics. The image really adds nothing to that, particularly as you can't even tell when or where it was taken just from looking at it, nor does it tell us anything about what entity is marching under the banner of "Vietnam" (only that someone is). There are no ways to fix these issues for this particular image in order to make its use comply with non-free content policy.
postdlf (
talk)
18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- It would need proof though. This photo helps fulfill that as a source. This photo definitely doesn't fail NFCC 1, see my first comment on its rarity and about South Vietnam Olympics having absolutely no image results. Could you please offer suggestions on how I can address the issues at hand?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
18:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- For the reasons already given. The information for which you're using the picture is easily communicated by text alone, and seeing a picture of them in the Parade of Nations doesn't significantly increase a reader's understanding of that fact. So it fails
WP:NFCC#1 and
WP:NFCC#8.
postdlf (
talk)
17:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the "Vietnam" sign and flag, represents the IOC's sole recognition of South Vietnam (
Republic of Vietnam) as the sole legitimate representative of Vietnam at the time, not recognizing communist
North Vietnam. This is reminiscent to how Taiwan (Republic of China) was recognized as the sole rep for China (not the communist People's Republic of China), and South Korea (Republic of Korea) instead of both North and South, at the IOC and other international bodies like the UN, before the international shift of diplomacy towards recognizing communist countries, and this photo is Vietnam's example of this. Of course there's little discussion on anything in each of the articles, because few editors edit it. And how can using this Olympic photo in
Vietnam at the 1972 Summer Olympics and
Vietnam at the Olympics a failure in NFCC 10 anyways?
Magicloveisintheair (
talk)
17:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and my above comments. postdlf ( talk) 18:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Vehemently Oppose, see my comments above. Magicloveisintheair ( talk) 18:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block AU Intertitle.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block AU Intertitle.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mr.Television ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block 4 Houses Logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block 4 Houses Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block All-Stars Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wattlebird ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Block Sky High logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wattlebird ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hilary Duff - 4ever Hilary Duff DVD.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Hilary Duff - 4ever Hilary Duff DVD.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rlholden ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Redundant to File:Forever Hilary.png, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:AttilioPalatini.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Image is {{ PD-Italy}} .
- File:AttilioPalatini.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mgvongoeden ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim that the image isn't replaceable. All photos of the guy which were taken during his lifetime should be in the public domain in his country of residence. If they were additionally published during his lifetime, then the pictures should be in the public domain in the US too. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's an old picture, already posted in the Italian version of Wikipedia. I have nothing else to add. Mgvongoeden ( talk) 16:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:ASM convalescing in DouglasAZHospital Corbis.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:ASM convalescing in DouglasAZHospital Corbis.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SteamWiki ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Claimed to be both copyrighted and in the public domain at the same time. If copyrighted, then it fails WP:NFC#UUI §7. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll update it with correct tags for public domain etc. as published in papers in 1926. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteamWiki ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- UPDATE It can be removed as this page has been retagged and replaced by File:ASM_in_DouglasAZHospital.jpg.
- Thanks again SteamWiki ( talk) 03:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.