The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It doesn't violate any non-free content criteria. It helps readers to know how the Žalgiris looks like in video game as it is the first time Žalgiris is featured in such a video game, so the image has decent extent of use, which means
WP:NFCC#3b is not violated. Most of the readers will google it anyway after reading such line that Žalgiris is included in a video game, so
WP:NFCC#8 is not violated as well as it "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". --
Pofka (
talk) 18:45, 2 October 2013 (GMT +2)
The article isn't about the video game, and there is zero critical discussion about the video game in the article. Compare with
MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and
WP:NFCI §1 which tells that cover art normally isn't appropriate in articles about the people who have made a product. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
21:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Critical commentary is that Žalgiris was featured in such product for the first time in the club history. --
Pofka (
talk) 13:52, 3 October 2013 (GMT +2)
That significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic and most of readers would google it anyway. --
Pofka (
talk) 14:27, 4 October 2013 (GMT +2)
It would, because then readers would have to search for images by themselves. --
Pofka (
talk) 18:44, 5 October 2013 (GMT +2)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment this file is used on multiple articles, not one article, there are multiple fair use justifications on the file page, not just one. --
76.65.129.3 (
talk)
06:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Huntress (Helena Wayne): Fails
WP:NFCC#3a and
WP:NFCC#8: redundant to other images, no discussion about the cover, TV series barely mentioned. Other images also need to be deleted from the article for various reasons.
Whatever the outcomes of this discussion, the main page can use either the title card or the poster. It's up to you guys to pick. I think I'll nominate the poster (the official poster from The WB network) and the removal of the title card. Using the poster probably better than the title card anyway because the poster has much better resolution than a screen capture from a DVD.--
NeoBatfreak (
talk)
18:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It doesn't violate any non-free content criteria. It helps readers to know how the Žalgiris looks like in video game as it is the first time Žalgiris is featured in such a video game, so the image has decent extent of use, which means
WP:NFCC#3b is not violated. Most of the readers will google it anyway after reading such line that Žalgiris is included in a video game, so
WP:NFCC#8 is not violated as well as it "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". --
Pofka (
talk) 18:45, 2 October 2013 (GMT +2)
The article isn't about the video game, and there is zero critical discussion about the video game in the article. Compare with
MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and
WP:NFCI §1 which tells that cover art normally isn't appropriate in articles about the people who have made a product. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
21:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Critical commentary is that Žalgiris was featured in such product for the first time in the club history. --
Pofka (
talk) 13:52, 3 October 2013 (GMT +2)
That significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic and most of readers would google it anyway. --
Pofka (
talk) 14:27, 4 October 2013 (GMT +2)
It would, because then readers would have to search for images by themselves. --
Pofka (
talk) 18:44, 5 October 2013 (GMT +2)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment this file is used on multiple articles, not one article, there are multiple fair use justifications on the file page, not just one. --
76.65.129.3 (
talk)
06:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Huntress (Helena Wayne): Fails
WP:NFCC#3a and
WP:NFCC#8: redundant to other images, no discussion about the cover, TV series barely mentioned. Other images also need to be deleted from the article for various reasons.
Whatever the outcomes of this discussion, the main page can use either the title card or the poster. It's up to you guys to pick. I think I'll nominate the poster (the official poster from The WB network) and the removal of the title card. Using the poster probably better than the title card anyway because the poster has much better resolution than a screen capture from a DVD.--
NeoBatfreak (
talk)
18:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.