The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
heavily edited orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 04:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC) reply
This non-free icon is too high resolution, so it is violating WP:NFCC#3. An icon with proper resolution ( File:Microsoft PowerPoint icon.png) is already present in Wikipedia. Codename Lisa ( talk) 06:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC) reply
This is replaceable by a different photo of the same equipment. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. No file exists by this name, but a local image description page does exist. If you are trying to nominate this description page for deletion, use {{ db-imagepage}} if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi. According to our policy, WP:NFCC#3, two non-free file should not be uploaded to Wikipedia when one is enough. In this case, I think this file is redundant because File:Winzip-17-pro-screenshot.png already serves its purpose. This file shows its subject on Windows 8, but I say so what? The only difference between the two is a slight change in their chrome. The other file, on the other hand, is in PNG format. (Still if the community wishes, we can delete the other file.) Codename Lisa ( talk) 12:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, low quality. We have many better images at Commons:Category:Crotalus horridus. Kelly hi! 15:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Essentially just a non-free photo of a woman. Doesn't help the understanding of the article. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused, no article, no obvious use foreseeable. Super Mario Man 19:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Image violated WP:NFCC#1. As the Evening Times was established in 1876, it's absolutely sure that there is a cover, that is out of copyright. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, the section this image was in gives info about what he did in later life, not how he looked. INeverCry 19:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
There is no discussion about what he looked like when he was old. There is already an image of him when he was younger. See WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, there's a free alternative, and the subject was known for what she did, not specifically how she looked. INeverCry 19:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Replaceable by File:Booth-booth-1904.jpg. The article is mostly about her when she's a lot younger than on this photo. See WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. The book image is only allowed in an article about the book, not in the article about the author. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1 as there are free images of him in his article. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
If still protected by copyright as claimed, then this violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:09, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
heavily edited orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 04:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC) reply
This non-free icon is too high resolution, so it is violating WP:NFCC#3. An icon with proper resolution ( File:Microsoft PowerPoint icon.png) is already present in Wikipedia. Codename Lisa ( talk) 06:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC) reply
This is replaceable by a different photo of the same equipment. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. No file exists by this name, but a local image description page does exist. If you are trying to nominate this description page for deletion, use {{ db-imagepage}} if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi. According to our policy, WP:NFCC#3, two non-free file should not be uploaded to Wikipedia when one is enough. In this case, I think this file is redundant because File:Winzip-17-pro-screenshot.png already serves its purpose. This file shows its subject on Windows 8, but I say so what? The only difference between the two is a slight change in their chrome. The other file, on the other hand, is in PNG format. (Still if the community wishes, we can delete the other file.) Codename Lisa ( talk) 12:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, low quality. We have many better images at Commons:Category:Crotalus horridus. Kelly hi! 15:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Essentially just a non-free photo of a woman. Doesn't help the understanding of the article. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused, no article, no obvious use foreseeable. Super Mario Man 19:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Image violated WP:NFCC#1. As the Evening Times was established in 1876, it's absolutely sure that there is a cover, that is out of copyright. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, the section this image was in gives info about what he did in later life, not how he looked. INeverCry 19:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
There is no discussion about what he looked like when he was old. There is already an image of him when he was younger. See WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, there's a free alternative, and the subject was known for what she did, not specifically how she looked. INeverCry 19:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Replaceable by File:Booth-booth-1904.jpg. The article is mostly about her when she's a lot younger than on this photo. See WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. The book image is only allowed in an article about the book, not in the article about the author. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1 as there are free images of him in his article. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply
If still protected by copyright as claimed, then this violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:09, 11 May 2013 (UTC) reply