The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject, low resolution. Kelly hi! 03:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 03:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 04:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 04:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, very bad stitchwork rendering it not useful B ( talk) 04:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, map of something drawn in MS Paint B ( talk) 04:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, contains credits in the image, presumably the figurines pictured are copyrighted and so this is not acceptably licensed anyway B ( talk) 04:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned personal photo. Kelly hi! 04:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--there is no justification for this picture. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — Darkwind ( talk) 20:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The image does not critically asses how the angel was designed in the show--it just has a cute, decorative tagline beneath it. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep ( non-admin closure) TB randley ( review) 15:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The design of the characters and how they changed for this episode could be discussed critically, but this image is not used for that purpose anyway. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. This scene isn't discussed critically and The Simpsons has dozens of sight gags in an episode. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — Darkwind ( talk) 20:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. This is one of several one-off sight gags in The Simpsons. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The Simpsons trades in sight gags and parodies constantly--is this piece of media really that necessary for understanding a small joke? — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly hi! 05:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned derivative work. Kelly hi! 05:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; please ask the original photographer to send an email to the OTRS team giving permission and selecting a license. Dianna ( talk) 15:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unclear evidence of permission. Kelly hi! 05:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
unused — rybec 06:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of some guy. Corresponding article Diego perez was speedily deleted seven years ago for lack of notability. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a musician. Corresponding article Jim Diamond (Canadian musician) was deleted six and a half years ago for non-notability and a lack of sources. No further encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a non-notable elementary school. The school previously had an article at Westcliffe Elementary, but it was redirected to Berea, South Carolina as a result of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. The file description page contains a paragraph about the school, but it is mostly promotional in its tone. — Bkell ( talk) 09:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Ymblanter ( talk) 09:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of Enabran Tain used in the infobox of The Wire (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine). While Tain does appear and have an important role in the final act of the show, showing him in the infobox is nothing more than a decorative use of a copyrighted image. B ( talk) 18:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a soccer player/supporter who appears not to be notable. He is supposedly the founder of a football club, but we don't have an article on that club. — Bkell ( talk) 19:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned low quality image. Wgunther ( talk) 21:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Wgunther ( talk) 21:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Blue star with the letters TK, apparently "made by the Ted Kennedy Club." Unused and no context for encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 23:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject, low resolution. Kelly hi! 03:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 03:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 04:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 04:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, very bad stitchwork rendering it not useful B ( talk) 04:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, screenshot of Wikipedia in Firefox, but contains elements of the Windows interface making it likely non-free. B ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, map of something drawn in MS Paint B ( talk) 04:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, contains credits in the image, presumably the figurines pictured are copyrighted and so this is not acceptably licensed anyway B ( talk) 04:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned personal photo. Kelly hi! 04:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--there is no justification for this picture. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — Darkwind ( talk) 20:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The image does not critically asses how the angel was designed in the show--it just has a cute, decorative tagline beneath it. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep ( non-admin closure) TB randley ( review) 15:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The design of the characters and how they changed for this episode could be discussed critically, but this image is not used for that purpose anyway. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. This scene isn't discussed critically and The Simpsons has dozens of sight gags in an episode. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — Darkwind ( talk) 20:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. This is one of several one-off sight gags in The Simpsons. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The Simpsons trades in sight gags and parodies constantly--is this piece of media really that necessary for understanding a small joke? — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly hi! 05:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 05:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned derivative work. Kelly hi! 05:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; please ask the original photographer to send an email to the OTRS team giving permission and selecting a license. Dianna ( talk) 15:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unclear evidence of permission. Kelly hi! 05:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
unused — rybec 06:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of some guy. Corresponding article Diego perez was speedily deleted seven years ago for lack of notability. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a musician. Corresponding article Jim Diamond (Canadian musician) was deleted six and a half years ago for non-notability and a lack of sources. No further encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a non-notable elementary school. The school previously had an article at Westcliffe Elementary, but it was redirected to Berea, South Carolina as a result of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. The file description page contains a paragraph about the school, but it is mostly promotional in its tone. — Bkell ( talk) 09:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Ymblanter ( talk) 09:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Screenshot of Enabran Tain used in the infobox of The Wire (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine). While Tain does appear and have an important role in the final act of the show, showing him in the infobox is nothing more than a decorative use of a copyrighted image. B ( talk) 18:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of a soccer player/supporter who appears not to be notable. He is supposedly the founder of a football club, but we don't have an article on that club. — Bkell ( talk) 19:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned low quality image. Wgunther ( talk) 21:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Wgunther ( talk) 21:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Blue star with the letters TK, apparently "made by the Ted Kennedy Club." Unused and no context for encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 23:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply