< January 30 | February 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--we can't use non-free media like this to identify persons for whom we have several free alternatives. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. -- BDD ( talk) 21:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
While this is a great image, it's unfortunatly released under a CC-BY-NC-SA license, which is not compatable with Wikipedia's licensing. The Bushranger One ping only 02:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
If the album has been released with different album covers, they can be added to the infobox using this template. However, per WP:NFCC#3 use of non-free content is to be minimal, and not to be used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion. Also, an alternate cover that is the subject of specific (sourced) critical commentary passes the criteria for inclusion. Covers that are essentially similar, despite differences in colouring, poses, text, etc, should not be included.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No evidence of publication. This looks like a family photo, so it is likely unpublished. It says that the photographer died in 1975. The copyright to a unpublished photo by an identified photographer expires 70 years after the death of the photographer, but the photographer has only been dead for approximately 40 years. Fails WP:NFCC#8 in both articles, so fair use is no option. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
< January 30 | February 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--we can't use non-free media like this to identify persons for whom we have several free alternatives. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. -- BDD ( talk) 21:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
While this is a great image, it's unfortunatly released under a CC-BY-NC-SA license, which is not compatable with Wikipedia's licensing. The Bushranger One ping only 02:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
If the album has been released with different album covers, they can be added to the infobox using this template. However, per WP:NFCC#3 use of non-free content is to be minimal, and not to be used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion. Also, an alternate cover that is the subject of specific (sourced) critical commentary passes the criteria for inclusion. Covers that are essentially similar, despite differences in colouring, poses, text, etc, should not be included.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover illustration. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No evidence of publication. This looks like a family photo, so it is likely unpublished. It says that the photographer died in 1975. The copyright to a unpublished photo by an identified photographer expires 70 years after the death of the photographer, but the photographer has only been dead for approximately 40 years. Fails WP:NFCC#8 in both articles, so fair use is no option. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply