< January 26 | January 28 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
File isn't low resolution (although could be adjusted), however the low res (and older) File:Stephanie 1.jpg adequately depicts the subject. Fails WP:NFCC minimal use requirement. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary unfree (and not especially low-res) image of a fairly non-notable character from the show House of Lies. BobAmnertiopsis ∴ ChatMe! 08:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
It is unclear in which way a scan of a BD cover is supposed to increase the understanding of a list of episodes. This seems to fail WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
There is already have File:New FIC logo.png and this file is no longer needed. jcn John Chen ( Talk- Contib.) RA 13:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Claimed to freely released by its creator Google! Google image search used as source points to here, a copyrighted blog, and the photo shows a clear copyright watermark - no evidence that the photo actually has been released under a free licence by the actual creator or copyright owner Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
A much higher-resolution version of this smae image now exists on the commons at commons:file:Getty Ms. Ludwig XV 13 28v - Fiore dei Liberi - Combat with Sword - Google Art Project (6897665).jpg, and the only article to use this file ( Fiore dei Liberi) has been edited accordingly. Michael Chidester ( talk) 18:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Very low quality. Too small to read anything other than the title. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply
For some unclear reason, a user is apparently changing all {{ subst:npd}} images into unfree images. This image has no chance of passing WP:NFCC#8 and it is not a "unique historical image" as currently stated. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
For some unclear reason, a user is apparently changing all {{ subst:npd}} images into unfree images. This image has no chance of passing WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:45, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 01:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This has no chances of passing WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
< January 26 | January 28 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
File isn't low resolution (although could be adjusted), however the low res (and older) File:Stephanie 1.jpg adequately depicts the subject. Fails WP:NFCC minimal use requirement. kelapstick( bainuu) 04:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary unfree (and not especially low-res) image of a fairly non-notable character from the show House of Lies. BobAmnertiopsis ∴ ChatMe! 08:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
It is unclear in which way a scan of a BD cover is supposed to increase the understanding of a list of episodes. This seems to fail WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
There is already have File:New FIC logo.png and this file is no longer needed. jcn John Chen ( Talk- Contib.) RA 13:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Claimed to freely released by its creator Google! Google image search used as source points to here, a copyrighted blog, and the photo shows a clear copyright watermark - no evidence that the photo actually has been released under a free licence by the actual creator or copyright owner Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
A much higher-resolution version of this smae image now exists on the commons at commons:file:Getty Ms. Ludwig XV 13 28v - Fiore dei Liberi - Combat with Sword - Google Art Project (6897665).jpg, and the only article to use this file ( Fiore dei Liberi) has been edited accordingly. Michael Chidester ( talk) 18:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Very low quality. Too small to read anything other than the title. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply
For some unclear reason, a user is apparently changing all {{ subst:npd}} images into unfree images. This image has no chance of passing WP:NFCC#8 and it is not a "unique historical image" as currently stated. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
For some unclear reason, a user is apparently changing all {{ subst:npd}} images into unfree images. This image has no chance of passing WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:45, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 01:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This has no chances of passing WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply