The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, a red arrow pointing right, no forseeable use. B ( talk) 02:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic B ( talk) 03:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. I'm not sure where the blank comes from, but I know that the cat on the right is from the Every time you masturbate... God kills a kitten meme, so unless the underlying photo (minus the domo-kuns) of the cat is free, this is a derivative work of a copyrighted picture. B ( talk) 03:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, too small to be of encyclopedic use. I have no idea who this person is, but even if we had an article on him, the licensing is dubious. B ( talk) 03:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, a retouched version of File:Brumbies vs Waratahs.JPG.jpg, but the original is overwhelmingly better. B ( talk) 03:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned. The image this one claims to be a derivative work of is not what it comes from. So we have no idea if the license is legitimate. B ( talk) 03:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, uploaded for deleted non-notable band. Even if we had an article on the band, the photo is of too poor quality to be especially useful. B ( talk) 03:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete - redundant for identification of both the music and the dance; the infobox image already meets both of those needs. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Image is used for decoration, rather than an informative use, violating WP:NFCC — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free media in contravention of WP:NFCC: usage does not greatly enhance understanding but merely provides decoration. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The chemical structure is incorrect. The tert-butyl group should be an isopropyl group. ChemNerd ( talk) 12:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image, lacking a description, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image lacking description, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused chart, Lacking description or context, Image doesn't assert the notability of the data it presents. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
First tagged as {{ cc-by-sa}} and then up for deletion due to lack of permission. Then changed to {{ non-free biog-pic}}, but there is no evidence that the photo satisfies WP:NFCC#4. If published during the lifetime of the person, then it is PD, but there is no evidence that the photo has been published. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image lacking description of context, image does not assert notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete all. Usage violates NFCC#8, as confirmed by discussion now at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 59#Promotional event posters as identification. – Quadell ( talk) 11:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The fair use rationale is faulty. It says that the purpose of use in the article is "to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question." However, the uploader hasn't explained in what way a match programme cover would be useful for anyone to identify a sports event. Normally, you would just identify such events by giving the name and date of the event. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Same uploader & same problem:
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
I don't really see why a box of DVDs would help understanding a list of episodes. This obviously violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Redundant to File:Neondian1985cover.jpeg, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, see File:Neondian1985cover.jpeg. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Misidentified image—the person shown is actually William Saville-Kent per the image in that article and in the National Library of Australia, of which this is obviously a derivative and to which it's redundant. (An actual image of Whicher can be seen in the Amazon "Look Inside" view of this book, facing page 304.) Deor ( talk) 15:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. A discussion between two editors on an article talk page is not "consensus" - and even if it were, they would be trumped by the policy concerns raised here. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1: essentially just a non-free photo of Richard O'Brien. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep as the other identifier in the infobox was deleted. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#3a. No need for two images in the infobox, and there's already File:Crystal Maze Series 1.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; in addition to the discussion below the image has been orphaned as a result of a discussion elsewhere. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete as above. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:38, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; no critical discussion, merely a description of the items in the room (which furthers the argument that this is replaceable by text). ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete - replaceable by the existing text in the article. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not needed for understanding the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not needed for understanding the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFC#UUI §6: essentially just a non-free photo of Edward Tudor-Pole. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic personal picture. 128.237.123.255 ( talk) 21:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Insufficient source for WP:NFCC#10a. Tagged {{ subst:nsd|non-free=yes}}, but the tag was removed. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep for copyright reasons. See note below. Nyttend ( talk) 16:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Temporary image, no longer seemingly in use Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a design above the threshold of originality, it's a named award, and without further evidence I'm skeptical as to how this can be a self. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, a red arrow pointing right, no forseeable use. B ( talk) 02:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic B ( talk) 03:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. I'm not sure where the blank comes from, but I know that the cat on the right is from the Every time you masturbate... God kills a kitten meme, so unless the underlying photo (minus the domo-kuns) of the cat is free, this is a derivative work of a copyrighted picture. B ( talk) 03:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, too small to be of encyclopedic use. I have no idea who this person is, but even if we had an article on him, the licensing is dubious. B ( talk) 03:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, a retouched version of File:Brumbies vs Waratahs.JPG.jpg, but the original is overwhelmingly better. B ( talk) 03:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned. The image this one claims to be a derivative work of is not what it comes from. So we have no idea if the license is legitimate. B ( talk) 03:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, uploaded for deleted non-notable band. Even if we had an article on the band, the photo is of too poor quality to be especially useful. B ( talk) 03:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete - redundant for identification of both the music and the dance; the infobox image already meets both of those needs. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Image is used for decoration, rather than an informative use, violating WP:NFCC — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free media in contravention of WP:NFCC: usage does not greatly enhance understanding but merely provides decoration. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The chemical structure is incorrect. The tert-butyl group should be an isopropyl group. ChemNerd ( talk) 12:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image, lacking a description, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image lacking description, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused chart, Lacking description or context, Image doesn't assert the notability of the data it presents. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
First tagged as {{ cc-by-sa}} and then up for deletion due to lack of permission. Then changed to {{ non-free biog-pic}}, but there is no evidence that the photo satisfies WP:NFCC#4. If published during the lifetime of the person, then it is PD, but there is no evidence that the photo has been published. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused image lacking description of context, image does not assert notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete all. Usage violates NFCC#8, as confirmed by discussion now at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 59#Promotional event posters as identification. – Quadell ( talk) 11:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The fair use rationale is faulty. It says that the purpose of use in the article is "to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question." However, the uploader hasn't explained in what way a match programme cover would be useful for anyone to identify a sports event. Normally, you would just identify such events by giving the name and date of the event. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Same uploader & same problem:
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
I don't really see why a box of DVDs would help understanding a list of episodes. This obviously violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Redundant to File:Neondian1985cover.jpeg, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, see File:Neondian1985cover.jpeg. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Misidentified image—the person shown is actually William Saville-Kent per the image in that article and in the National Library of Australia, of which this is obviously a derivative and to which it's redundant. (An actual image of Whicher can be seen in the Amazon "Look Inside" view of this book, facing page 304.) Deor ( talk) 15:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 13:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. A discussion between two editors on an article talk page is not "consensus" - and even if it were, they would be trumped by the policy concerns raised here. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1: essentially just a non-free photo of Richard O'Brien. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep as the other identifier in the infobox was deleted. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#3a. No need for two images in the infobox, and there's already File:Crystal Maze Series 1.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; in addition to the discussion below the image has been orphaned as a result of a discussion elsewhere. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete as above. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:38, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; no critical discussion, merely a description of the items in the room (which furthers the argument that this is replaceable by text). ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not discussed critically. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete - replaceable by the existing text in the article. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not needed for understanding the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#8: not needed for understanding the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. ( ESkog)( Talk) 20:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFC#UUI §6: essentially just a non-free photo of Edward Tudor-Pole. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic personal picture. 128.237.123.255 ( talk) 21:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Insufficient source for WP:NFCC#10a. Tagged {{ subst:nsd|non-free=yes}}, but the tag was removed. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep for copyright reasons. See note below. Nyttend ( talk) 16:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Temporary image, no longer seemingly in use Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a design above the threshold of originality, it's a named award, and without further evidence I'm skeptical as to how this can be a self. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply