The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:2-Bromobutyric Acid.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ReactGroup18 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor quality file. Structures should be png or better still svg. Orphan File. Now superseded by File:2-bromobutyric acid.png  Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 00:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Harmful Irritant.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ReactGroup18 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor quality. Better version available as svg at File:GHS-pictogram-exclam.svg  Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 00:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Cupid's Span (censored).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mikhail Ryazanov ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic. This image is a "redacted" version of File:Cupid's Span.jpg. The original image had copyright problems, and now the "solution" just makes it unencyclopedic. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 06:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Keep, move to Commons. 'Unencyclopedic' isn't a great deletion reason. Best case: move to Commons, as it contains no non-free elements. It is the subject of discussion at various venues. Another editor described its use as "tempting." To delete the image would damage the sense of those discussions. It is not prohibited or deprecated by any policy, guideline, or essay. And, it's still an option if Wikimedia ever gets the will to fundamentally protest abuse of DMCA. -- Lexein ( talk) 12:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

That's kind of a ridiculous proposition. We are here to build an encyclopedia, and thus "unencyclopedic" is a perfectly valid reason. Additionally, I don't see what sort of educational purpose this would serve on Commons, as educational usefulness is required to be within Commons' scope. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 01:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

FYI, Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion explains that Unencyclopedic means "The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos)." I suppose, the argument about userpages applies to discussion pages as well. That is, if somebody thinks that deleting a currently used image is somehow better than keeping it, they must provide a valid and rational reason for doing so. — Mikhail Ryazanov ( talk) 09:25, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Lack of policy against an image is not "ridiculous", it is a simple fact. Educational potential is in the eye of all beholders, not you alone. Educational value can be direct or indirect: here, the potential DMCA-based removal of content from an image of a public area is a kind of denial of reality, unintended consequence though it is, and an absurdity which is profoundly illustrated here. The image illustrates the redaction of depiction of the artwork from its surrounding park area, both of which were privately funded and donated to the City of San Francisco by the founders of the GAP corporation. By your lights, it seems no vestige should remain of depiction of the reality surrounding the removal of the photographic sculptural depiction, because the (alleged) copyright owner somehow holds sway over depiction of the surrounding reality too. They don't. That they might be perceived to have such sway is the actual ridiculous proposition exposed by this image. Aside from that, the image is an instance of a thoroughly in-compliance response to a potential DMCA request, which should be held in readiness precisely to comply. The image itself was already released by the photographer under CC, and edited under the terms of CC, so, lacking any non-free elements, its home is uncontroversially Commons. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Comment that's interesting, should we endeavour to produce these for all problematic photos of the same type? -- 70.24.250.26 ( talk) 04:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC) reply
  • No - we delete these sorts of photos unless they satisfy WP:NFCC in its entirety. Redacting the subject of the photo doesn't serve anyone's purpose. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 06:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply

No, moving to Commons as completely free is a thoroughly valid option, in the absence of any policy-based explanation why not. Just "we delete" - once again, that becoming-all-too-familiar arms-crossed attitude instead of actual discussion. Wish you'd answer Ryazanov or me. -- Lexein ( talk) 20:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete. This image would not last long on Commons because of how ridiculous it is. The main purpose of this image is to show the sculpture. It's being censored, and... it becomes entirely useless. There are several freely licensed files of the area behind this sculpture, and this one is simply unnecessary. — ξ ^xplicit 02:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply
• Delete I see no purpose for a picture of something if the entire picture is covered up with black bars. There are two places that have a picture of the thing that aren't censored. File:Rincon_Park_and_Cupid's_Span.jpg and File:Cupid's Span.jpg Dream Focus 14:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Going to say this once: Contrary to what some users may think, "decorative" is a valid argument for deletion for non-free content, and is being treated as such here. After the first "keep" !vote, the nominator appended a more detailed deletion rationale, which rendered the first argument moot. For the second "keep" !vote, that was an attack on the nominator, but did not address the specifics of the image in question, and has thus been disregarded. Since the same images have been copy-pasted down the entire row, this should be taken as the closing rationale for all similar deletion discussions on this page. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 00:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Andy checking phone on stage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NetflixSoup ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator has ignored where the scene depicted or the contents of the scene have been critically discussed. All such nominations are suspect and should be withdrawn as invalid. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:The office grief counseling.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CPnieuws ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator has ignored where the scene depicted or the contents of the scene have been critically discussed. All such nominations are suspect and should be withdrawn as invalid. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Carride.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Noir ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator has ignored where the scene depicted or the contents of the scene have been critically discussed. All such nominations are suspect and should be withdrawn as invalid. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Office sabre2.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mackerni888 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Office scott's tots.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SchrutedIt08 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Nominator has ignored where the scene depicted has been critically discussed by reviews. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Jimchuck teststore.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gen. Quon ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Office st patricks day.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mackerni888 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically, but is decorative (cf. NFCC #8.) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bart's Comet.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:The Simpsons 5F24.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:AllSingingAllDancingTV.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:MaggieAynRand.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:AStreetCarNamedMargeImage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:EotY.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:AStarIsBorn-Again.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:A Star is Burns.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Planetoftheapesmusical.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:AFishCalledSelma.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:22shortfilmspulpfiction.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:22shortfilmsaboutspringfield.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:ScuseMeWhileIMissTheSky.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:ScuseMeWhileIMissTheSky.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:"Round Springfield" (SImpsons episode - screenshot).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Andouble ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bleedinggm.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bt2.PNG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bt1.PNG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bonfire filming.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Simpsons 8F16.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bart the General2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MrJanitor1 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Robotic Richard Simmons.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Burns' Heir.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Cecil and Bob.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Strong keep: The imae in question is used on two pages, and in both cases it shows a character who is critical to the episode. In the both the Sideshow Bob and Brother From Another Series articles, Cecil's appearance in comparison to Bob is discussed in detail, so the image aids in helping the readers' understanding of the subject. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 19:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:BFAS Deleted Scene.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bart to the Future.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleftorium ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep You're obviously mass-nominating screenshots for deletion without even bothering to see if they pass NFCC#8. This one does, as the designs of the characters in the future are discussed in the article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Response I did, in fact, read the text. Since there isn't another image for comparison, then it's hard to gauge how critical this is. On the other hand, I think you might be right that this is sufficient for explaining visually how depressing future Bart is supposed to look. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 12:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep I agree with Theleftorium, the nominator clearly did not read the rationale. The image helps here because it shows four recurring Simpsons characters with significant redesigns. A suggestion for Lefty, it would be helpful if you could find an image with all four that shows their normal designs, and incorporate it into the file. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 19:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Simpsons Blood Feud.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Simpsons Olmec Head.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Brother from the same planet.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tree Biting Conspiracy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bart the Mother.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gary King ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Brother's Little Helper.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Readers can easily visualize Bart having smaller pupils. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bart the Genius.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bartsinnerchild.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:HABF07.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Zachary Vaughn.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Francisco97 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bartofdarkness.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Bartofdarknessjimmystewart.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Simpsons-Sunsphere.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Awiseman ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• KEEP I disagree, it demonstrates what the episode is about, that the city has deteriorated. -- AW ( talk) 00:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

  Response But is the image necessary? Would readers' understanding of this episode be significantly harmed by its deletion? — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

  Yes, I believe so. -- AW ( talk) 16:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator is fixated on an extremist, fringe interpretation of NFCC not supported by consensus or WMF text. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:The Simpsons - Bart Gets Hit by a Car screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sandgem Addict ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:FABF17.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:BraveComboSimpsons.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dravecky ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep as while this image is arguably decorative in the Simpsons episode article, it's used critically in the Brave Combo article. It illustrates what mere words cannot. - Dravecky ( talk) 22:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Response But that usage is also invalid. Readers' understanding of the band would not be greatly diminished if it was removed from the article. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 12:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Reply: I don't believe that "greatly diminished" is part of the standard at work here. - Dravecky ( talk) 04:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply
      • Reply' All non-free media "is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Are you arguing that readers significantly understand the Brave Combo more by seeing this picture? — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply
        • Reply: I'm saying that the image helps significantly understand the band's appearance on The Simpsons, as discussed in the accompanying text, better than the flat statement. The image also depicts a specific lineup in a band with a 30+ year history and an ever-shifting membership, capturing a moment in the band's history and illustrating their look and personality through simplified animation drawing that the text cannot convey. - Dravecky ( talk) 17:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
          • Response But it doesn't: readers can understand that the band appeared on the show without the image. If there was critical discussion of exactly how they were designed for the show, then you could keep it. Otherwise, we cannot. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. The nominator is being WP:POINTY by insisting on a fringe interpretation of NFCC, against consensus, against WMF, and against a rational-man reading of NFCC. The band's appearance as animated characters can literally not be understood at all without the image. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:D'oh-in in the Wind.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. They just have ponytails--this can be conveyed with text. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Deep Space Homer2.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Diatribe of a Mad Housewife scene.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ief ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:The Simpsons 5F11.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Duffless.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fitch ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. No accompanying image from the film being parodied is shown, so there is no meaningful critical commentary. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:DufflessSimp.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:MartinBeforeDeath.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:HomerMargeMaudeNed.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:S19e14 23.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Sneakers.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:BBBReardon.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Homer Strangling Bart.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cam486 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as failing WP:NFCC#8 for lack of contextual significance (illustration not necessary for understanding of the text). SchuminWeb ( Talk) 01:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Rake Joke.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Readers can understand the idea of nine rakes being on the ground without the non-free media. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Keep. The image is used to illustrate a segment from the episode Cape Feare that is discussed in depth in the text for the article. The image helps the reader understand the joke because it is somewhat complex. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 19:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Response The question is not whether or not it helps, but if readers' understanding is significantly effected by the presence or absence of the material. If you really wanted to help, you could just include a video of the joke--that would be explicit and very helpful, but it wouldn't be fair-use, because it's not necessary for understanding. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

How do you know it doesn't help readers' understanding? When you enter with a closed mind, of course you're not going to see such things. As I said, it explains a rather complex joke that is very difficult to visualize. The image helps the reader understand this joke. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 14:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I agree with User:Scorpion0422. It helps. -- AW ( talk) 16:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Response WP:CIVIL, Scorpion--don't make personal attacks. Readers can easily visualize a bunch of rakes laying on the ground, so it's hard to justify this image in particular. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator has ignored where the scene depicted or the contents of the scene have been critically discussed. All such nominations are suspect and should be withdrawn as invalid. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:CEDoh.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Catch 'Em if You Can.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Matheus Wahl ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Lesser clod morphine.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hackerlovesme ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Eternal Moonshine of the Simpson Mind.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:The Simpsons 3F24.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Another image is included for technical details of the dream sequence. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. -- Maitch ( talk) 17:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. -- Lexein ( talk) 06:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

File:E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tree Biting Conspiracy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. ( NFCC#8) Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply