The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, smaller resolution version of File:Churchlaneschool.jpg. Not eligible for deletion under F8 as there is a small difference (a border). — ξ xplicit 00:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Possible CV. This image was tagged as a CV of an image on this page, but I declined it because the one here on Wikipedia is technically superior (it doesn't appear as grainy, for example) and lacks the watermark that is so obvious in the bottom left corner of the other image. Nevertheless, I fear that this is a CV of the same image from a different source; the chance of the other website taking this image and modifying it with a false authorship claim is very small, and I expect that it's much more likely that both images are taken from another website. Nyttend ( talk) 05:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Disputed speedy. There is already an image of the (very similar) current logo- we do not need to see the historical logos, and it's not clear that this one is in any way significant. J Milburn ( talk) 08:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
I dont see how this helps me understand the episode better, its a non free image of a character, who is appearing in a cross over episode. The article could easily have a free image (which there is one), and have the same effect as this. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 10:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A non free screenshot showing two people smiling. It does in no way help me to understand the article better, and there are no critics commenting on this particuar scene (there are no references on the article at all). There are two free images of both of the actresses in this photo, easily replacable. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 10:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. There is precisely zero mention of the covers, or this alternative cover, in the article and I cannot see what, particularly what of significance, this images adds to reader's understanding. Without sourced commentary about the image itself this clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The image is unencyclopaedic, and a caricature of the culture it claims to represent (practically a Borat-like characterization) I know for a fact that this image is not representative of the culture it claims to be Lordsheikh ( talk) 15:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The image is unencyclopaedic, and a caricature of the culture it claims to represent (practically a Borat-like characterization) I know for a fact that this image is not representative of the culture it claims to be Lordsheikh ( talk) 15:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Seems too high in resolution to meet Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, same image already exists in a lower resolution at File:Bane Tom Hardy5.jpg. Chris the Paleontologist ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, smaller resolution version of File:Churchlaneschool.jpg. Not eligible for deletion under F8 as there is a small difference (a border). — ξ xplicit 00:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Possible CV. This image was tagged as a CV of an image on this page, but I declined it because the one here on Wikipedia is technically superior (it doesn't appear as grainy, for example) and lacks the watermark that is so obvious in the bottom left corner of the other image. Nevertheless, I fear that this is a CV of the same image from a different source; the chance of the other website taking this image and modifying it with a false authorship claim is very small, and I expect that it's much more likely that both images are taken from another website. Nyttend ( talk) 05:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Disputed speedy. There is already an image of the (very similar) current logo- we do not need to see the historical logos, and it's not clear that this one is in any way significant. J Milburn ( talk) 08:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
I dont see how this helps me understand the episode better, its a non free image of a character, who is appearing in a cross over episode. The article could easily have a free image (which there is one), and have the same effect as this. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 10:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A non free screenshot showing two people smiling. It does in no way help me to understand the article better, and there are no critics commenting on this particuar scene (there are no references on the article at all). There are two free images of both of the actresses in this photo, easily replacable. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 10:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete While we de facto allow a single non-free image in many types of articles to provide a visual identification of the subject for the reader, concert tours aren't one of these types. If a particular tour does have a visual identification that would be relevant to the reader, it should be easy enough to find reliable sources that mention the artwork. Anomie ⚔ 01:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. No critical commentary about this poster and it's rationale with the claim that it somehow significantly contributes to readers' understanding is wholly unjustified. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply
decorative non-free image. There is precisely zero mention of the covers, or this alternative cover, in the article and I cannot see what, particularly what of significance, this images adds to reader's understanding. Without sourced commentary about the image itself this clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The image is unencyclopaedic, and a caricature of the culture it claims to represent (practically a Borat-like characterization) I know for a fact that this image is not representative of the culture it claims to be Lordsheikh ( talk) 15:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The image is unencyclopaedic, and a caricature of the culture it claims to represent (practically a Borat-like characterization) I know for a fact that this image is not representative of the culture it claims to be Lordsheikh ( talk) 15:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Seems too high in resolution to meet Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, same image already exists in a lower resolution at File:Bane Tom Hardy5.jpg. Chris the Paleontologist ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC) reply