The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A non-free image being used to show the director... directing. Entirely replaceable by text, violates point one of WP:NFCC. — ξ xplicit 00:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical event it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, no source, possible album cover? No encyc use. Skier Dude ( talk) 02:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR 'logo' (text only), no encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 02:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR user-logo; no encyc use foreseen Skier Dude ( talk) 02:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails NFCC 8; you don't need to see the GUI in order to know that it offers humorous responses, and there's already another image of the GUI in the infobox. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A low-quality personal photograph of little encyclopedic use, and of little benefit to Commons. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
I highly doubt the Star of Life is cc-licensed. Might qualify for fair use or else. I'm not familiar enough with enwiki guidelines to judge on that. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Image quality is atrocious. It is impossible to see what's going on. Bazonka ( talk) 17:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
It is not necessary to host a copy of a programme cover in order to tell that people were doing things in Australia in 1962. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep - When I reviewed the adjacent article for GA I was unsure of this image on exactly these grounds, but the reply to my question Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2012/June#Request_for_aid_on_reviewing_images. was positive (admittedly only one editor replied, but there was no disent). Fayedizard ( talk) 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#8. No need for a photo of the sign outside the building. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A non-free image being used to show the director... directing. Entirely replaceable by text, violates point one of WP:NFCC. — ξ xplicit 00:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical event it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo ( talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, no source, possible album cover? No encyc use. Skier Dude ( talk) 02:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR 'logo' (text only), no encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 02:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
OR user-logo; no encyc use foreseen Skier Dude ( talk) 02:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails NFCC 8; you don't need to see the GUI in order to know that it offers humorous responses, and there's already another image of the GUI in the infobox. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
A low-quality personal photograph of little encyclopedic use, and of little benefit to Commons. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
I highly doubt the Star of Life is cc-licensed. Might qualify for fair use or else. I'm not familiar enough with enwiki guidelines to judge on that. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Image quality is atrocious. It is impossible to see what's going on. Bazonka ( talk) 17:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
It is not necessary to host a copy of a programme cover in order to tell that people were doing things in Australia in 1962. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep - When I reviewed the adjacent article for GA I was unsure of this image on exactly these grounds, but the reply to my question Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2012/June#Request_for_aid_on_reviewing_images. was positive (admittedly only one editor replied, but there was no disent). Fayedizard ( talk) 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#8. No need for a photo of the sign outside the building. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC) reply