< January 22 | January 24 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image of Mt. Fuji includes two odd black lines drawn on the image taking away any encyclopedic or photographic value the image may have once had. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 00:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 00:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality (background removed so hard to determine what is the cross) so no likely use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 00:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use, appears to be former user page image :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
someone deleted the image belongs article, that's why image is an orphan. ~avaloan~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaloan ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 03:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 03:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality, back and white version of File:DredScott.jpg :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 04:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 04:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, UE, user disappeared, only edits Skier Dude ( talk) 05:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, used only for vandalism Skier Dude ( talk) 05:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination per [1]. Files appear to fail WP:NFCC#8, used purely for decorative means. FASTILYs (TALK) 07:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Moved to commons as jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 12:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Moved to commons as jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 12:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file without description, source is dead Bulwersator ( talk) 13:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file without description, source is dead Bulwersator ( talk) 13:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no description so can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 14:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The 2006 version can be deleted as it is unused and unneeded considering that File:D Yo scale.svg is available. I'm not sure if the 2010 version is useful. In any case, it is currently unused. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is too blury (low quality) to understand the subject of the image. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 17:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is too blury (low quality) to understand the subject of the image. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 17:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Stated to be a temporary image only to be kept if used, but is now orphaned, so should be safe to delete. Acather96 ( talk) 17:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Person unlikely to be notable. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia user who isn't notable. Not in use. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of non-notable Wikipedia user. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, most probably vandalism IMO. Orphaned. Acather96 ( talk) 19:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless image of non-notable subject, the page is hoasting a paragraph of junk of unref'd BLP about this person (now redacted). Possibly vandalism. Acather96 ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, unencyclopedic, orphaned etc. Acather96 ( talk) 19:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, orphaned ,unencyclopedic and non-notable subject etc. Acather96 ( talk) 19:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, non-notable Wikipedia user, unencyclopedic etc. And looking at the description, it looks like i just about avoided a virtual assault on a minor technicality :D Acather96 ( talk) 20:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, useless etc. Acather96 ( talk) 20:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, useless, non-notable Wikipedia user etc. Acather96 ( talk) 20:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Commons:File:Furietti.jpg is much better. Since it isn't exactly identical, I'm not sure if I should add {{ NowCommons}}, so I'm nominating it here instead. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
-- This photo is used in Polish Wikipedia pages, so before deletion, please, make sure it won't affect foreign Project pages.
I wouldn't delete that one.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned photo is taken and odd angle, has little encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. Also, the summary describes that the tower is "unconventional" but the unconventional part is not in the photo. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I would prefer not to delete this particular photo. The tower is specific, it's the only ęxample of generic Polish technical design so far. I think will be useful to keep that photo. Besides that, quality is good.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC) - reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has little encyclopedic value unless there is an article about rain on windshields. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is low quality and has little encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is low quality and has no value on Wikipedia as its page was deleted see:[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Hensill]. Also no source listed. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I wouldn't delete that Photo because of quality, if it comes down to archive materials, with historic value, it's better to keep them, because not everything old is digitalised these days.
So, I'm in opposition to deletion. We should keep it.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. I took the liberty of speedying it. File I made 6 years ago, now vectorized and on commons Samir 00:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality (badJPG). Leyo 23:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
< January 22 | January 24 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image of Mt. Fuji includes two odd black lines drawn on the image taking away any encyclopedic or photographic value the image may have once had. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 00:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 00:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality (background removed so hard to determine what is the cross) so no likely use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 00:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use, appears to be former user page image :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
someone deleted the image belongs article, that's why image is an orphan. ~avaloan~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaloan ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 01:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 03:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 03:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality, back and white version of File:DredScott.jpg :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 04:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 04:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, UE, user disappeared, only edits Skier Dude ( talk) 05:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
OR, used only for vandalism Skier Dude ( talk) 05:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination per [1]. Files appear to fail WP:NFCC#8, used purely for decorative means. FASTILYs (TALK) 07:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Moved to commons as jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 12:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Moved to commons as jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 12:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file without description, source is dead Bulwersator ( talk) 13:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file without description, source is dead Bulwersator ( talk) 13:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no description so can't see use :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 14:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The 2006 version can be deleted as it is unused and unneeded considering that File:D Yo scale.svg is available. I'm not sure if the 2010 version is useful. In any case, it is currently unused. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is too blury (low quality) to understand the subject of the image. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 17:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is too blury (low quality) to understand the subject of the image. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 17:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Stated to be a temporary image only to be kept if used, but is now orphaned, so should be safe to delete. Acather96 ( talk) 17:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Person unlikely to be notable. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia user who isn't notable. Not in use. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused photo of non-notable Wikipedia user. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, most probably vandalism IMO. Orphaned. Acather96 ( talk) 19:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless image of non-notable subject, the page is hoasting a paragraph of junk of unref'd BLP about this person (now redacted). Possibly vandalism. Acather96 ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, unencyclopedic, orphaned etc. Acather96 ( talk) 19:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, orphaned ,unencyclopedic and non-notable subject etc. Acather96 ( talk) 19:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, non-notable Wikipedia user, unencyclopedic etc. And looking at the description, it looks like i just about avoided a virtual assault on a minor technicality :D Acather96 ( talk) 20:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, useless etc. Acather96 ( talk) 20:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, useless, non-notable Wikipedia user etc. Acather96 ( talk) 20:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Commons:File:Furietti.jpg is much better. Since it isn't exactly identical, I'm not sure if I should add {{ NowCommons}}, so I'm nominating it here instead. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
-- This photo is used in Polish Wikipedia pages, so before deletion, please, make sure it won't affect foreign Project pages.
I wouldn't delete that one.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned photo is taken and odd angle, has little encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality image is not encyclopedic. Also, the summary describes that the tower is "unconventional" but the unconventional part is not in the photo. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I would prefer not to delete this particular photo. The tower is specific, it's the only ęxample of generic Polish technical design so far. I think will be useful to keep that photo. Besides that, quality is good.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC) - reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has little encyclopedic value unless there is an article about rain on windshields. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is low quality and has little encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is low quality and has no value on Wikipedia as its page was deleted see:[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc Hensill]. Also no source listed. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I wouldn't delete that Photo because of quality, if it comes down to archive materials, with historic value, it's better to keep them, because not everything old is digitalised these days.
So, I'm in opposition to deletion. We should keep it.
89.69.53.99 ( talk) 10:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. I took the liberty of speedying it. File I made 6 years ago, now vectorized and on commons Samir 00:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality (badJPG). Leyo 23:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply