The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned raw version of File:NHVanVorhes.jpg. Kelly hi! 00:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned crop of File:Lewis E. Parsons - Brady-Handy.jpg. Kelly hi! 00:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned the link is dead Annj87 ( talk) 05:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned personal image Skier Dude ( talk) 06:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned personal image Skier Dude ( talk) 06:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Substantially similar to movie poster--invalid FUR — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The original file, on which this image is based, File:Spark plug construction.jpg has no source information, yet it claims to be a copyright free image because it was published in Poland before 1994. Given the questionable status of the original image I don't think that this derivative image should be allowed. Biker Biker ( talk) 08:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Well, given that the original image from which it has been derived has not been nominated for deletion, this is more the personal agenda that doesn't know their technical ceramics than it is about "questionable credentials". Backing up from this issue though, the article into which it's posted needs a section diagram of this type. The original Polish one is the best available that's labeled as being in the commons. Industry shill ( talk) 16:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, used in a now deleted copyvio. No foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 08:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Media file available in Commons. Raising DI since my addition of tag NCD was reverted stating different file size. Sreejith K ( talk) 10:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, no description. It's a simple abstract sketch. No encyclopedic purpose. – Quadell ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep
Looks like a copyvio. (Uploader does not seem to be copyright holder) – Quadell ( talk) 16:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality due to low resolutin/lack of description/size. Hence this is unencyclopedic. Acather96 ( talk) 16:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 18:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 18:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Useless, seems to encourage disrupive behaviour. Only used twice in user talk. Acather96 ( talk) 18:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and low quality, only used in userspace Acather96 ( talk) 18:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and low quality, only used in userspace, possible copyright issues Acather96 ( talk) 18:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
"a screenshot shewing a problem with the Wikipedia Signpost" Old orphan, not useful – Quadell ( talk) 19:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This is clearly not a screenshot. Saulo Talk to Me 21:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned raw version of File:NHVanVorhes.jpg. Kelly hi! 00:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned crop of File:Lewis E. Parsons - Brady-Handy.jpg. Kelly hi! 00:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
CV smita ( talk) 05:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned the link is dead Annj87 ( talk) 05:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned personal image Skier Dude ( talk) 06:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned personal image Skier Dude ( talk) 06:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Substantially similar to movie poster--invalid FUR — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The original file, on which this image is based, File:Spark plug construction.jpg has no source information, yet it claims to be a copyright free image because it was published in Poland before 1994. Given the questionable status of the original image I don't think that this derivative image should be allowed. Biker Biker ( talk) 08:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Well, given that the original image from which it has been derived has not been nominated for deletion, this is more the personal agenda that doesn't know their technical ceramics than it is about "questionable credentials". Backing up from this issue though, the article into which it's posted needs a section diagram of this type. The original Polish one is the best available that's labeled as being in the commons. Industry shill ( talk) 16:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, used in a now deleted copyvio. No foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 08:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Media file available in Commons. Raising DI since my addition of tag NCD was reverted stating different file size. Sreejith K ( talk) 10:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, no description. It's a simple abstract sketch. No encyclopedic purpose. – Quadell ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep
Looks like a copyvio. (Uploader does not seem to be copyright holder) – Quadell ( talk) 16:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality due to low resolutin/lack of description/size. Hence this is unencyclopedic. Acather96 ( talk) 16:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 18:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 18:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Useless, seems to encourage disrupive behaviour. Only used twice in user talk. Acather96 ( talk) 18:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and low quality, only used in userspace Acather96 ( talk) 18:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and low quality, only used in userspace, possible copyright issues Acather96 ( talk) 18:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
"a screenshot shewing a problem with the Wikipedia Signpost" Old orphan, not useful – Quadell ( talk) 19:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Old mockup for Signpost logos, not useful anymore. – Quadell ( talk) 19:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply
This is clearly not a screenshot. Saulo Talk to Me 21:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply