The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The way the image is being used does not meet non-free content criteria (based on contextual significance). Blurpeace 01:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
See this Commons thread (warning: long) for verification of point #1. Text titles makes it look very much like it's a screencap. User was asked to provide some evidence that his uploads are his own work and refused to do so. Herostratus ( talk) 03:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This image does meet the criteria for WP:NFCC. Only one source, this file has no rationale. JJ98 ( Talk) 04:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Uploader is using Wikipedia as an image hosting service. This is their only contribution to Wikipedia, and the image has no encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This is a non-free video screenshot showing a martial artist with a "badly bruised" face, being used to convey the information that this martial artist had his face badly bruised during a professional fight. That the fighter got hit during a fight is a trivial (and expected) information that need not an illustration to be understood. The specific points on his face where his blood is mining is not of relevance. The article says he got hurt and that's enough. Damiens.rf 16:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unecessary non-free video screenshot showing two guys arguing, used just to let the reader know that the two guys argued. Damiens.rf 16:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free video screenshot showing on martial artist applying on of the many maneuvers he applied on one of his many opponents. The moment itself is not specially notable, not does it needs an image to be understood (in both articles where it's being used). Damiens.rf 16:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free movie poster for a non-notable movie just mentioned in an article. Damiens.rf 16:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
There's a free image of this living person available. Damiens.rf 17:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image of a living person. Damiens.rf 17:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. It contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no relevant information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. The same article that this image was used in, Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express, has other images that also likely warrant some attention. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 20:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free photograph of a voice actor in a studio, used in the article about the video game for which he was working. Not needed to understand the relevant info in the article, and no visual details in the photograph that are the object of any discussion. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Misleading, inaccurate, and lacks encyclopedic value. See the talk page or this Reddit discussion for details. In addition, the copyright/licensing status is incorrect: this is not an original work, but rather a derived work of File:NY Height Comparison.png. — Bill Price ( nyb) 23:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Clearly, this image does not meet the Non-free content criteria policy. Fails WP:NFCC#8. JJ98 ( Talk) 23:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The way the image is being used does not meet non-free content criteria (based on contextual significance). Blurpeace 01:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
See this Commons thread (warning: long) for verification of point #1. Text titles makes it look very much like it's a screencap. User was asked to provide some evidence that his uploads are his own work and refused to do so. Herostratus ( talk) 03:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This image does meet the criteria for WP:NFCC. Only one source, this file has no rationale. JJ98 ( Talk) 04:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Uploader is using Wikipedia as an image hosting service. This is their only contribution to Wikipedia, and the image has no encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This is a non-free video screenshot showing a martial artist with a "badly bruised" face, being used to convey the information that this martial artist had his face badly bruised during a professional fight. That the fighter got hit during a fight is a trivial (and expected) information that need not an illustration to be understood. The specific points on his face where his blood is mining is not of relevance. The article says he got hurt and that's enough. Damiens.rf 16:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unecessary non-free video screenshot showing two guys arguing, used just to let the reader know that the two guys argued. Damiens.rf 16:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free video screenshot showing on martial artist applying on of the many maneuvers he applied on one of his many opponents. The moment itself is not specially notable, not does it needs an image to be understood (in both articles where it's being used). Damiens.rf 16:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free movie poster for a non-notable movie just mentioned in an article. Damiens.rf 16:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
There's a free image of this living person available. Damiens.rf 17:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image of a living person. Damiens.rf 17:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. It contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no relevant information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. The same article that this image was used in, Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express, has other images that also likely warrant some attention. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 20:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free photograph of a voice actor in a studio, used in the article about the video game for which he was working. Not needed to understand the relevant info in the article, and no visual details in the photograph that are the object of any discussion. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Misleading, inaccurate, and lacks encyclopedic value. See the talk page or this Reddit discussion for details. In addition, the copyright/licensing status is incorrect: this is not an original work, but rather a derived work of File:NY Height Comparison.png. — Bill Price ( nyb) 23:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Clearly, this image does not meet the Non-free content criteria policy. Fails WP:NFCC#8. JJ98 ( Talk) 23:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply