The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted PROD'd article, no foreseeable use. Possibly copyrighted. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned logo of some sort, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. - FASTILY (TALK) 01:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Image of the Aggie Bonfire used under a claim of fair use. The article has multiple free content photos of the event that have been uploaded subsequent to this one - we don't need a fair use one. B ( talk) 03:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by Rcbutcher ( talk · contribs) with the following rationale: "laterally inverted, hence unusable as a historical record. Also there is no evidence of provenance hence suspect authenticity." I have no basis for any opinion about this file, so this nomination should not be considered a delete vote. Danger ( talk) 05:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
This image is in violation of Wikipedia Non-Free Content Criterion 3a: Minimal usage which says "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information" because File:Visual Basic.NET screenshot.png, which is a screenshot of Visual Basic 2010 Express and fill the role of this picture. Fleet Command ( talk) 08:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no apparent use B ( talk) 19:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, duplicate of File:Parteiadler der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945).png, which is a PNG. B ( talk) 19:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic, no longer in use or needed Glitchd ( talk) 19:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file, small, dark, unknown subject. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file. Why the black bars? - looks speciously like a TV image. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free television screenshot which purports to be "the primary means of visual identification of the subject" but is redundant to the infobox image File:Ronnie Mitchell.jpg. No critical commentary on the subject's appearance which would necessitate an additional image, fails NFCC#8. Frickative 22:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free television screenshots with purpose given as illustration. Not necessary to understand the storylines - nothing that can't be conveyed textually, and the visual specifics of the scenes are not subject to critical commentary. Both fail NFCC#8. Frickative 22:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now deleted PROD'd article, no foreseeable use. Possibly copyrighted. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned logo of some sort, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. - FASTILY (TALK) 01:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Image of the Aggie Bonfire used under a claim of fair use. The article has multiple free content photos of the event that have been uploaded subsequent to this one - we don't need a fair use one. B ( talk) 03:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by Rcbutcher ( talk · contribs) with the following rationale: "laterally inverted, hence unusable as a historical record. Also there is no evidence of provenance hence suspect authenticity." I have no basis for any opinion about this file, so this nomination should not be considered a delete vote. Danger ( talk) 05:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
This image is in violation of Wikipedia Non-Free Content Criterion 3a: Minimal usage which says "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information" because File:Visual Basic.NET screenshot.png, which is a screenshot of Visual Basic 2010 Express and fill the role of this picture. Fleet Command ( talk) 08:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no apparent use B ( talk) 19:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, duplicate of File:Parteiadler der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945).png, which is a PNG. B ( talk) 19:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic, no longer in use or needed Glitchd ( talk) 19:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file, small, dark, unknown subject. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file. Why the black bars? - looks speciously like a TV image. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free television screenshot which purports to be "the primary means of visual identification of the subject" but is redundant to the infobox image File:Ronnie Mitchell.jpg. No critical commentary on the subject's appearance which would necessitate an additional image, fails NFCC#8. Frickative 22:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free television screenshots with purpose given as illustration. Not necessary to understand the storylines - nothing that can't be conveyed textually, and the visual specifics of the scenes are not subject to critical commentary. Both fail NFCC#8. Frickative 22:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply