The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Old, failed proposal from 2010. Not useful for anything anymore. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly hi! 00:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Apparently an a priori flag design: i.e. original research. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, watermark indicates that this probably isn't free. No encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and unused. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused and unencyclopedic. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
File:Prithvi Raj Chauhan.JPG is better. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I do not believe this non-free image adds anything not seen in the other images already present, and therefore fails the NFCC. Not listing under speedy, despite being orphaned, because I just removed it from the page. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
This isn't a screenshot of one of the movies, it's a screenshot of a non-free desktop filled with folders containing those movies. Does not add to the understanding of the article that it is in. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No clue what the color-coding might mean. Also watermarked with a URL which has a clear copyright statement [1]. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
A higher resolution version of this exists on Commons as File:PacificSurfliner.jpg. I think both versions are properly licensed but there's no need to keep this lower-resolution version. I've replaced all the local uses with the commons file. Mackensen (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no reason for two non-free movie posters of the same movie in the same article. This is the second one, so I think it should go per the NFCC 3a and 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Despite being the software screenshot for the article, I actually think that it fails NFCC #8. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 06:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The new minimalist design is not very different from the already present logo, File:StuffIt Expander.png, so I don't see a reason for it in the article (it's non-free). Sven Manguard Wha? 15:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, lacking a clear description, despite a 1 month old request. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete image, orphan. No indication of data source used for study. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No freedom of panorama in France I'm afraid. Sculpture isn't that old. multichill ( talk) 21:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. - FASTILY Happy 2012!! 05:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Source [2] Under Canadian Crown Copyright which does not allow for commercial use. As noted here permission to reproduce is required. maclean ( talk) 22:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Old, failed proposal from 2010. Not useful for anything anymore. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly hi! 00:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Apparently an a priori flag design: i.e. original research. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, watermark indicates that this probably isn't free. No encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and unused. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused and unencyclopedic. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
File:Prithvi Raj Chauhan.JPG is better. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I do not believe this non-free image adds anything not seen in the other images already present, and therefore fails the NFCC. Not listing under speedy, despite being orphaned, because I just removed it from the page. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
This isn't a screenshot of one of the movies, it's a screenshot of a non-free desktop filled with folders containing those movies. Does not add to the understanding of the article that it is in. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No clue what the color-coding might mean. Also watermarked with a URL which has a clear copyright statement [1]. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
A higher resolution version of this exists on Commons as File:PacificSurfliner.jpg. I think both versions are properly licensed but there's no need to keep this lower-resolution version. I've replaced all the local uses with the commons file. Mackensen (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no reason for two non-free movie posters of the same movie in the same article. This is the second one, so I think it should go per the NFCC 3a and 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Despite being the software screenshot for the article, I actually think that it fails NFCC #8. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 06:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The new minimalist design is not very different from the already present logo, File:StuffIt Expander.png, so I don't see a reason for it in the article (it's non-free). Sven Manguard Wha? 15:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, lacking a clear description, despite a 1 month old request. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Obsolete image, orphan. No indication of data source used for study. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No freedom of panorama in France I'm afraid. Sculpture isn't that old. multichill ( talk) 21:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. - FASTILY Happy 2012!! 05:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Source [2] Under Canadian Crown Copyright which does not allow for commercial use. As noted here permission to reproduce is required. maclean ( talk) 22:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply