The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Gamaliel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence the copyright for this work is owned by the state government of Florida. Kelly hi! 03:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No importance for the article about the play, because this image is from the film adaption. If at all, it could be useful for the article on the film, but the article doesn't exist yet. The Evil IP address ( talk) 08:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Duplicate of [1], it is a bit different (ugly green letter rather than better white) so unable to tag as speeedy. Bulwersator ( talk) 09:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Non-analytical, "in-universe" caption; not otherwise embedded in analytical commentary; fails NFCC#8. FUR makes the point that the scene depicted and its role in a story arch are discussed in the article. That may be true, but it's irrelevant. The scene is being discussed, but this image is not, and there is no explanation why we would need the image to understand the text. What visual details are necessary: the creative composition of the shot? The lighting? The costumes? The actors' postures or facial expressions? Nothing of all this is the object of commentary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image being used to decorate a list. We have free images of this guy. damiens.rf 17:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Derivative work. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 ( talk) 19:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
upside-down version of this image Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Gamaliel ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence the copyright for this work is owned by the state government of Florida. Kelly hi! 03:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No importance for the article about the play, because this image is from the film adaption. If at all, it could be useful for the article on the film, but the article doesn't exist yet. The Evil IP address ( talk) 08:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Duplicate of [1], it is a bit different (ugly green letter rather than better white) so unable to tag as speeedy. Bulwersator ( talk) 09:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Non-analytical, "in-universe" caption; not otherwise embedded in analytical commentary; fails NFCC#8. FUR makes the point that the scene depicted and its role in a story arch are discussed in the article. That may be true, but it's irrelevant. The scene is being discussed, but this image is not, and there is no explanation why we would need the image to understand the text. What visual details are necessary: the creative composition of the shot? The lighting? The costumes? The actors' postures or facial expressions? Nothing of all this is the object of commentary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image being used to decorate a list. We have free images of this guy. damiens.rf 17:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Derivative work. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 ( talk) 19:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
upside-down version of this image Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply