From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
October 2
File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).
- Duplicate of File:British Colonies in North America c1750 v2.png and not in use because the other image is accessable universally unlike this one and the numbers are fuzzy. Vadac ( talk) 00:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, no significant differences, and the Commons image is more easy to understand. Nyttend ( talk) 04:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nelly - JAD Video Snaps.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Nelly - JAD Video Snaps.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by UNGGGGG ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Non-free image used in the Just a Dream (Nelly song) article apparently to show some part of the music video for the song. The image shows something which could easily be put into text (so doesn't meet WP:CSD#1) and isn't discussed in the article (so doesn't meet WP:CSD#8). Blanket exemptions in WP:NFC do not seem to apply here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:GNW original cast.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:GNW original cast.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shoemoney2night ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- The file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file; the file is an image of three living people. Alex Douglas ( talk) 07:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lge Mike 080229010448225 wideweb 300x300.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kimchi.sg ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Lge Mike 080229010448225 wideweb 300x300.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shoemoney2night ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- The file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file; the file is an image of two living people. Alex Douglas ( talk) 07:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, replaceable. Nyttend ( talk) 15:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Washdc.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Washdc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Beatlerev ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Image was only used in a deleted article 3 years ago and has no further forseeable encyclopedic use. So Why 11:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, no context for who this person is or how we could use this image. Nyttend ( talk) 15:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:KimJongUn.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 16:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:KimJongUn.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Harro5 ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Pictures of people still alive, groups still active Shizhao ( talk) 12:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep It's always useful to read the whole sentence:
Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image.
- "almost" is the key word here. It is utterly absurd to treat this as a hard and fast rule, and ignore the intent of WP:NFC. The question to ask is very simple: can this image be replaced by a free alternative? You don't have to be a political scientist to know that the answer to that question is no. This is also explained on the image description page. Had Fair Use not applied, the image would still qualify under Template:PD-DPRKGov. I wish sometimes that we could stop pursuing ridiculous interpretations of copyright laws and focus instead on creating a useful and informative encyclopaedia. Lampman ( talk) 13:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- I didn't know about DPRK pictures being in the public domain. Should the image be tagged differently? Some news sources (including the one I saved the image from) credited Reuters.
Harro5
13:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- There was a discussion on the talk page of the article where a user objected to using Template:PD-DPRKGov. I said that I thought it qualified, but that if there was a problem, then the image would still qualify as Fair Use. I still think it should be tagged as PD though. Lampman ( talk) 18:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- I didn't know about DPRK pictures being in the public domain. Should the image be tagged differently? Some news sources (including the one I saved the image from) credited Reuters.
Harro5
13:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- keep，useing Template:PD-DPRKGov for any file from North Korea is suitable and exactly.-- Coekon ( talk) 21:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, very unlikely that there will ever be a free alternative. -- 204.34.211.65 ( talk) 20:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:01 Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts sample.ogg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:01 Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts sample.ogg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by BootleggerWill ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Corrupt or empty image. Dawnseeker2000 16:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Deleted under criterion F2. Nyttend ( talk) 15:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tato, Joe & Pollo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Tato, Joe & Pollo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sangresabia ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused "Personal property picture" Soundvisions1 ( talk) 22:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, useless here, and quite out of scope at Commons. Nyttend ( talk) 15:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:450px-Marfa 090.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:450px-Marfa 090.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Teddyrow ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused personal image. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 23:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, useless here, and quite out of scope at Commons. Nyttend ( talk) 15:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:457376-R2-05-5.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:457376-R2-05-5.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Upeter911 ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused image. An editor familiar with racing should check to see if a 1976 image of Norbert Singer with Jacky Ickx would be of use. Uploader did nothing else but upload this so it is not clear what their intent was. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 23:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend ( talk) 15:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
October 2
File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:British Colonies in North America c1750.png listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).
- Duplicate of File:British Colonies in North America c1750 v2.png and not in use because the other image is accessable universally unlike this one and the numbers are fuzzy. Vadac ( talk) 00:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, no significant differences, and the Commons image is more easy to understand. Nyttend ( talk) 04:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nelly - JAD Video Snaps.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Nelly - JAD Video Snaps.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by UNGGGGG ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Non-free image used in the Just a Dream (Nelly song) article apparently to show some part of the music video for the song. The image shows something which could easily be put into text (so doesn't meet WP:CSD#1) and isn't discussed in the article (so doesn't meet WP:CSD#8). Blanket exemptions in WP:NFC do not seem to apply here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:GNW original cast.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:GNW original cast.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shoemoney2night ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- The file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file; the file is an image of three living people. Alex Douglas ( talk) 07:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lge Mike 080229010448225 wideweb 300x300.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kimchi.sg ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Lge Mike 080229010448225 wideweb 300x300.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shoemoney2night ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- The file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file; the file is an image of two living people. Alex Douglas ( talk) 07:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, replaceable. Nyttend ( talk) 15:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Washdc.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Washdc.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Beatlerev ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Image was only used in a deleted article 3 years ago and has no further forseeable encyclopedic use. So Why 11:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, no context for who this person is or how we could use this image. Nyttend ( talk) 15:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:KimJongUn.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 16:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:KimJongUn.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Harro5 ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Pictures of people still alive, groups still active Shizhao ( talk) 12:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep It's always useful to read the whole sentence:
Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image.
- "almost" is the key word here. It is utterly absurd to treat this as a hard and fast rule, and ignore the intent of WP:NFC. The question to ask is very simple: can this image be replaced by a free alternative? You don't have to be a political scientist to know that the answer to that question is no. This is also explained on the image description page. Had Fair Use not applied, the image would still qualify under Template:PD-DPRKGov. I wish sometimes that we could stop pursuing ridiculous interpretations of copyright laws and focus instead on creating a useful and informative encyclopaedia. Lampman ( talk) 13:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- I didn't know about DPRK pictures being in the public domain. Should the image be tagged differently? Some news sources (including the one I saved the image from) credited Reuters.
Harro5
13:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- There was a discussion on the talk page of the article where a user objected to using Template:PD-DPRKGov. I said that I thought it qualified, but that if there was a problem, then the image would still qualify as Fair Use. I still think it should be tagged as PD though. Lampman ( talk) 18:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- I didn't know about DPRK pictures being in the public domain. Should the image be tagged differently? Some news sources (including the one I saved the image from) credited Reuters.
Harro5
13:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- keep，useing Template:PD-DPRKGov for any file from North Korea is suitable and exactly.-- Coekon ( talk) 21:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, very unlikely that there will ever be a free alternative. -- 204.34.211.65 ( talk) 20:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:01 Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts sample.ogg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:01 Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts sample.ogg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by BootleggerWill ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Corrupt or empty image. Dawnseeker2000 16:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Deleted under criterion F2. Nyttend ( talk) 15:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tato, Joe & Pollo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:Tato, Joe & Pollo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sangresabia ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused "Personal property picture" Soundvisions1 ( talk) 22:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, useless here, and quite out of scope at Commons. Nyttend ( talk) 15:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:450px-Marfa 090.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:450px-Marfa 090.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Teddyrow ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused personal image. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 23:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Delete, useless here, and quite out of scope at Commons. Nyttend ( talk) 15:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:457376-R2-05-5.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 00:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- File:457376-R2-05-5.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Upeter911 ( notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused image. An editor familiar with racing should check to see if a 1976 image of Norbert Singer with Jacky Ickx would be of use. Uploader did nothing else but upload this so it is not clear what their intent was. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 23:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend ( talk) 15:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.