The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator. Concern has been addressed. — ξ xplicit 18:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Well it's certainly made me think about this a bit, but I think the process seems to work as it is. I mean the notification is sent to the uploader, who is then free to join in the discussion or work on the issue that's presented. Dawnseeker2000 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaulting to keep. PhilKnight ( talk) 16:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Kinu ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. PhilKnight ( talk) 16:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep Image is unique demonstrating the controversy surrounding the episode; And it was only orphaned due to Mike Removing it from the article before nominating it for deletion. I have Restored it in the article and i wish it to remain until this concludes. In full disclosure i Uploaded it.
Weaponbb7 (
talk)
12:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
keep his episode has a major effect on at least one old episode and maybe also future episodes. This never happened in the 14 years since South Park started and I guess it can be considered as important. From my point of view this text is not creative enough to be eligible for copyright. So
Template:PD-ineligible could be used and it could be also moved to Commons so other WMF prjects can use it (e.g. Wikinews). Again: This is MY point of view. Others may or may not agree with me. (btw: The filename could be better) --
D-Kuru (
talk)
14:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Also by same user:
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Black Kite ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 23:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator. Concern has been addressed. — ξ xplicit 18:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Well it's certainly made me think about this a bit, but I think the process seems to work as it is. I mean the notification is sent to the uploader, who is then free to join in the discussion or work on the issue that's presented. Dawnseeker2000 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaulting to keep. PhilKnight ( talk) 16:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Kinu ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. PhilKnight ( talk) 16:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep Image is unique demonstrating the controversy surrounding the episode; And it was only orphaned due to Mike Removing it from the article before nominating it for deletion. I have Restored it in the article and i wish it to remain until this concludes. In full disclosure i Uploaded it.
Weaponbb7 (
talk)
12:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
keep his episode has a major effect on at least one old episode and maybe also future episodes. This never happened in the 14 years since South Park started and I guess it can be considered as important. From my point of view this text is not creative enough to be eligible for copyright. So
Template:PD-ineligible could be used and it could be also moved to Commons so other WMF prjects can use it (e.g. Wikinews). Again: This is MY point of view. Others may or may not agree with me. (btw: The filename could be better) --
D-Kuru (
talk)
14:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Also by same user:
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Black Kite ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 23:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply