The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
You Know Sixtin Chapel ceiling. Darwin and Wallace face were taken from very old photos we used to construct a poster for our walls ,coloured and retouched with Corel and other painting programs. This is our own work,additional drawings ,insect etc.But you will tell if this is appropriate. This is because I did not put in the page straight away -- Virginal6 ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
-- 83.40.4.56 ( talk) 14:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
1)Darwin.
It was later modified by computer drawing prograns
2)Wallace
It was heavily modified by computer drawing programs.
They are old photographs available to public,as far as I know.
Rest of the figure is artwork done by us,with Sistin Chapel ceiling as a background.-- Virginal6 ( talk) 20:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted, fails WP:NFCC#1. – Quadell ( talk) 17:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Have you seen this tag:
{{
PD-US-1996}}
It seems that only Commons requires PD in USA aswell?
Chesdovi (
talk)
22:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Replaced by smaller jpg for use in info box. aspoblogo.jpg
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I list many pieces of evidence on my talk page that point to this user's sexual preferences. If there is a better reason to remove a picture than the fact that is a picture of minor posted by a pedophile I don't know it. I know it is not immediately evident, that's why the pictures have been up so long. But if you take the time to research their edits and pictures it shows who this person probably is. I can't 100 percent prove it, I'm not a mind reader, but I have posted enough information that points strongly to my conclusion. This picture should be deleted as soon as possible. Bigpindahouse —Preceding undated comment added 02:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC). reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Bigpindahouse —Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC). reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
You Know Sixtin Chapel ceiling. Darwin and Wallace face were taken from very old photos we used to construct a poster for our walls ,coloured and retouched with Corel and other painting programs. This is our own work,additional drawings ,insect etc.But you will tell if this is appropriate. This is because I did not put in the page straight away -- Virginal6 ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
-- 83.40.4.56 ( talk) 14:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
1)Darwin.
It was later modified by computer drawing prograns
2)Wallace
It was heavily modified by computer drawing programs.
They are old photographs available to public,as far as I know.
Rest of the figure is artwork done by us,with Sistin Chapel ceiling as a background.-- Virginal6 ( talk) 20:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted, fails WP:NFCC#1. – Quadell ( talk) 17:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Have you seen this tag:
{{
PD-US-1996}}
It seems that only Commons requires PD in USA aswell?
Chesdovi (
talk)
22:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Replaced by smaller jpg for use in info box. aspoblogo.jpg
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I list many pieces of evidence on my talk page that point to this user's sexual preferences. If there is a better reason to remove a picture than the fact that is a picture of minor posted by a pedophile I don't know it. I know it is not immediately evident, that's why the pictures have been up so long. But if you take the time to research their edits and pictures it shows who this person probably is. I can't 100 percent prove it, I'm not a mind reader, but I have posted enough information that points strongly to my conclusion. This picture should be deleted as soon as possible. Bigpindahouse —Preceding undated comment added 02:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC). reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 01:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Bigpindahouse —Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC). reply