The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep — Aitias // discussion 03:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
-- ClemRutter ( talk) 22:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaults to keep. Stifle ( talk) 09:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: All deleted. Stifle ( talk) 16:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Deserted image, missing license. The Cool Kat ( talk) 17:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - it is sufficiently unclear that this is a PD image so the copyright tag is needed. per WP:NFCC#10 a rationale is required for each use and one has not been provided. Also asserted that a free alternate could be created - Peripitus (Talk) 11:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
PD-ineligible}}
, since it's merely a non-creative tracing of a PD inscription? –
Quadell (
talk)
22:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replyPlease keep this drawing as it is particularly interesting due to the Maltese/Phoenician/Aryan/Old British Cross which is shown next to the inscription. Square crosses are found on many pre-christian British inscriptions/monuments as well as in Phoenician/Hittite/Syrian/Old Indo European sites.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 00:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep — Aitias // discussion 03:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
-- ClemRutter ( talk) 22:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, defaults to keep. Stifle ( talk) 09:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: All deleted. Stifle ( talk) 16:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete — Aitias // discussion 03:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Deserted image, missing license. The Cool Kat ( talk) 17:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - it is sufficiently unclear that this is a PD image so the copyright tag is needed. per WP:NFCC#10 a rationale is required for each use and one has not been provided. Also asserted that a free alternate could be created - Peripitus (Talk) 11:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
PD-ineligible}}
, since it's merely a non-creative tracing of a PD inscription? –
Quadell (
talk)
22:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replyPlease keep this drawing as it is particularly interesting due to the Maltese/Phoenician/Aryan/Old British Cross which is shown next to the inscription. Square crosses are found on many pre-christian British inscriptions/monuments as well as in Phoenician/Hittite/Syrian/Old Indo European sites.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC) reply