The result of the discussion was: keep although I strongly disagree with this decision and suspect a good number of those !voting keep don't correctly understand our policies and procedures (or, at least, have no idea what deletion review and a procedural renomination is). LiteraryMaven and DGG make sufficiently convincing arguments that the use of this picture is permissible. -- B ( talk) 18:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Well i think that it should be deleted as that the article is redirected so currently the pic is no needed but might for the future but until then i don't care if it is deleted. Ladgy ( talk) 06:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep although I strongly disagree with this decision and suspect a good number of those !voting keep don't correctly understand our policies and procedures (or, at least, have no idea what deletion review and a procedural renomination is). LiteraryMaven and DGG make sufficiently convincing arguments that the use of this picture is permissible. -- B ( talk) 18:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Well i think that it should be deleted as that the article is redirected so currently the pic is no needed but might for the future but until then i don't care if it is deleted. Ladgy ( talk) 06:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC) reply