From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 10

Uploaded by Gerald Farinas ( notify). OR. Fair use image replaced with a freely licenced equivalent - JeremyA 02:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Queeniemusic ( notify). Image was uploaded for use in a vanity article that has since been deleted. Uploader has no edits before or since 20 December. - Icarus 05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Queeniemusic ( notify). Same as above. However, I do not know if this image was ever actually used in an article. - Icarus 05:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by John Mash ( notify). CV from [1] - Kareeser| Talk! 06:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Arights ( notify). This image is of poor quality and cropped beyond recognition. It's practically impossible for anyone to make out what it depicts. — Psychonaut 07:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Keep like earlier The image was already for deletion. I spoke with Nv8200p over a long time and Nv8200p helped me get it in approvable shape. The cropping was done because it is fair use and fair use. The quality reduction was done because fair use requires a reduced quality. The unvandalized version of furvert http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Furvert&oldid=46280786 has a description that clarifies. To my knowledge Nv8200p is in charge of the images for deletion and Nv8200p previously decided it was acceptable. Psychonaut would it fully please you to have a high-qualty uncropped version? I will do the work of making another image if you can help with the vandalism from admin ContiE of the article furvert. Arights 08:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, it would fully please me to have a high-quality uncropped image, but only if it can be used under the GFDL or another permissive license. If the high-quality uncropped version of this image is not licensable for use on Wikipedia, then I suggest you find a different image. — Psychonaut 08:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
No admin is "in charge" of images for deletion. Any admin may process images based on th facts presented - Nv8200p talk 02:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Fonziethefonz ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Joshuaasmith ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by MonkeyCMonkeyDo ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by SD193RG ( notify). OR, Non-image file — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Seb951 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Brian Coughlin ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Lovelovelovefab4 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Lovelovelovefab4 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Brian Coughlin ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Alexiii ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Superdoo ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Hughdogg ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by User:Ta bu shi da yu ( notify). Use is inconsistent with fair use tag requiring that it be to illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover.Tomyumgoong 13:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Absolutely object! This:
  1. Illustrates the goatse.cx article - at least until it was taken off the article by User:Tomyumgoong. That is totally inappropriate, I have rolled back as I count that as vandalism.
  2. It is an appropriate use of the image: it illustrates the article, and not only that does it in a transformative fashion. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
To admins: there is no consensus to delete this image. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Jean-Martin ( notify). Has only been used for attacks (see [3], for example) Henrik 13:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Berserker79 ( notify). OB by new picture Image:Acryloyl chloride2.png and thus OR. – Berserker79 15:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Kurtisnizzel ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Aej ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Doneuron ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Doneuron ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Sparkguitar05 ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Joema ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 10

Uploaded by Gerald Farinas ( notify). OR. Fair use image replaced with a freely licenced equivalent - JeremyA 02:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Queeniemusic ( notify). Image was uploaded for use in a vanity article that has since been deleted. Uploader has no edits before or since 20 December. - Icarus 05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Queeniemusic ( notify). Same as above. However, I do not know if this image was ever actually used in an article. - Icarus 05:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by John Mash ( notify). CV from [1] - Kareeser| Talk! 06:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Arights ( notify). This image is of poor quality and cropped beyond recognition. It's practically impossible for anyone to make out what it depicts. — Psychonaut 07:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Keep like earlier The image was already for deletion. I spoke with Nv8200p over a long time and Nv8200p helped me get it in approvable shape. The cropping was done because it is fair use and fair use. The quality reduction was done because fair use requires a reduced quality. The unvandalized version of furvert http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Furvert&oldid=46280786 has a description that clarifies. To my knowledge Nv8200p is in charge of the images for deletion and Nv8200p previously decided it was acceptable. Psychonaut would it fully please you to have a high-qualty uncropped version? I will do the work of making another image if you can help with the vandalism from admin ContiE of the article furvert. Arights 08:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, it would fully please me to have a high-quality uncropped image, but only if it can be used under the GFDL or another permissive license. If the high-quality uncropped version of this image is not licensable for use on Wikipedia, then I suggest you find a different image. — Psychonaut 08:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
No admin is "in charge" of images for deletion. Any admin may process images based on th facts presented - Nv8200p talk 02:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Fonziethefonz ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Joshuaasmith ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by MonkeyCMonkeyDo ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by SD193RG ( notify). OR, Non-image file — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Seb951 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Brian Coughlin ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Lovelovelovefab4 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Lovelovelovefab4 ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Brian Coughlin ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Alexiii ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Superdoo ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Hughdogg ( notify). OR — Hunter 09:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by User:Ta bu shi da yu ( notify). Use is inconsistent with fair use tag requiring that it be to illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover.Tomyumgoong 13:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Absolutely object! This:
  1. Illustrates the goatse.cx article - at least until it was taken off the article by User:Tomyumgoong. That is totally inappropriate, I have rolled back as I count that as vandalism.
  2. It is an appropriate use of the image: it illustrates the article, and not only that does it in a transformative fashion. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
To admins: there is no consensus to delete this image. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Jean-Martin ( notify). Has only been used for attacks (see [3], for example) Henrik 13:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Berserker79 ( notify). OB by new picture Image:Acryloyl chloride2.png and thus OR. – Berserker79 15:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Kurtisnizzel ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Aej ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Doneuron ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Doneuron ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Sparkguitar05 ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by Joema ( notify). ORHunter 17:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook