I am nominating this for GTRC on the grounds that Starcraft 2 was supposed to be a Good or Featured article before October 27 and it is well was the date.
GamerPro64 (
talk) 22:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)reply
It might be prudent to try nomming it for GA, since while it's not one the article seems to be in good shape. Granted, it would take 2+ months to get the review ready that should have happened by the end of October...
WizardmanOperation Big Bear 21:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Remove - Starcraft II has had only ~40 edits in the past two months, and the difference between October 6 and today
is not major, indicating it could have been nominated, but was not. --
Teancum (
talk) 17:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Remove - II is nowhere close to GA status right now, and
S@bre doesn't appear as active these days.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(
talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I am nominating this for GTRC on the grounds that Starcraft 2 was supposed to be a Good or Featured article before October 27 and it is well was the date.
GamerPro64 (
talk) 22:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)reply
It might be prudent to try nomming it for GA, since while it's not one the article seems to be in good shape. Granted, it would take 2+ months to get the review ready that should have happened by the end of October...
WizardmanOperation Big Bear 21:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Remove - Starcraft II has had only ~40 edits in the past two months, and the difference between October 6 and today
is not major, indicating it could have been nominated, but was not. --
Teancum (
talk) 17:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Remove - II is nowhere close to GA status right now, and
S@bre doesn't appear as active these days.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(
talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)reply