Halloween film series
| Main page | Articles |
| Halloween (film series) | Halloween (film) - Halloween II - Halloween III: Season of the Witch |
I would like this topic to be removed, because Halloween (film series) is not a GA and the topic does have an obvious gap with the rest of the films missing. -- Maitch 13:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove - I was about to nominate this myself. It's missing five movies, which makes an obvious gap in the topic. The missing movies are all start-class, so they are ineligible to be added to the topic. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 18:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Same here, was about to nominate. Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove per the gap. Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove per gap and dubious quality of main article.
Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It COULD be kept if it was refactored as "Halloween original trilogy" series, and if the main article was improved, though.
Circeus 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if "original trilogy" would work with this. It would be an artificial title given to the first three films that (as far as I know) none of the people involved in the films actually used themselves. Dmoon1 18:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is there any special about the first three movies that would let them be their own topic without the rest of the series? --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 23:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about the fact that John Carpenter was involved with those three?--
Rmky87 00:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if "Halloween films by John Carpenter" is a clear enough topic to pass critiria #1. It seems a bit arbitrary. -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about the fact that John Carpenter was involved with those three?--
Rmky87 00:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It COULD be kept if it was refactored as "Halloween original trilogy" series, and if the main article was improved, though.
Circeus 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove It's a shame it has to be removed, but the film articles from 4 onwards aren't that wonderful. It'd be great if DMoon1 wished to work on the other Halloween films sometime in the future - he did a splendid job on the first three. LuciferMorgan 10:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove obvious gap in topic, missing articles not at least GA. Jay32183 06:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Removal passed - -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Halloween film series
| Main page | Articles |
| Halloween (film series) | Halloween (film) - Halloween II - Halloween III: Season of the Witch |
I would like this topic to be removed, because Halloween (film series) is not a GA and the topic does have an obvious gap with the rest of the films missing. -- Maitch 13:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove - I was about to nominate this myself. It's missing five movies, which makes an obvious gap in the topic. The missing movies are all start-class, so they are ineligible to be added to the topic. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 18:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Same here, was about to nominate. Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove per the gap. Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove per gap and dubious quality of main article.
Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It COULD be kept if it was refactored as "Halloween original trilogy" series, and if the main article was improved, though.
Circeus 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if "original trilogy" would work with this. It would be an artificial title given to the first three films that (as far as I know) none of the people involved in the films actually used themselves. Dmoon1 18:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is there any special about the first three movies that would let them be their own topic without the rest of the series? --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 23:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about the fact that John Carpenter was involved with those three?--
Rmky87 00:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if "Halloween films by John Carpenter" is a clear enough topic to pass critiria #1. It seems a bit arbitrary. -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about the fact that John Carpenter was involved with those three?--
Rmky87 00:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It COULD be kept if it was refactored as "Halloween original trilogy" series, and if the main article was improved, though.
Circeus 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove It's a shame it has to be removed, but the film articles from 4 onwards aren't that wonderful. It'd be great if DMoon1 wished to work on the other Halloween films sometime in the future - he did a splendid job on the first three. LuciferMorgan 10:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove obvious gap in topic, missing articles not at least GA. Jay32183 06:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Removal passed - -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)