From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Final Fantasy titles

The grace period for this topic has ended, and not all of the articles are good ( Final Fantasy III and Final Fantasy VII). - Xnux the Echidna 15:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Sigh, what is there to say? FIII needs more references but there aren't that many for it, and FFVII was totally fixable but no one was interested. I supposed it will come back within a year, once it has some more work done to it. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove Each article covers a very large subject in itself, and information updates are regularly needed all over the series; perhaps this topic is simply too huge to be manageable for the time being. Featured (sub)topics might be a more realistic goal for these articles for now. The FFVIII subtopic has always managed to maintain its high quality. Once more subtopics are produced I believe this main topic will become more easily manageable. Kariteh ( talk) 16:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • I don't think this is too huge to work. Once each games gets a GA or FA, demotions should be rare, and it isn't asking too much to get each new game in the main series up to GA when they are released every other year. -- Arctic Gnome ( talkcontribs) 17:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove This topic was already kept once because of Gerrymandering. Z gin der 2008-06-10T18:15Z ( UTC)
  • Remove. I'm sad to say it, but this topic does not currently meet the criteria. I do believe, however, it can be renominated quite quickly, and I'm planning on getting FFVII to at least GA status. When the next candidacy is up, I would like to see FFX-2 and Mystic Quest removed, as they are not part to the main series. The Prince ( talk) 19:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • Well, I don't think anyone is ever happy to vote for the removal of an FT... Kariteh ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove LuciferMorgan ( talk) 11:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove Two of its articles are below good article status. Martarius ( talk) 08:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove per criterion 3. – thedemonhog talkedits 21:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Close as consensus to remove -- Arctic Gnome ( talkcontribs) 17:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Final Fantasy titles

The grace period for this topic has ended, and not all of the articles are good ( Final Fantasy III and Final Fantasy VII). - Xnux the Echidna 15:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Sigh, what is there to say? FIII needs more references but there aren't that many for it, and FFVII was totally fixable but no one was interested. I supposed it will come back within a year, once it has some more work done to it. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove Each article covers a very large subject in itself, and information updates are regularly needed all over the series; perhaps this topic is simply too huge to be manageable for the time being. Featured (sub)topics might be a more realistic goal for these articles for now. The FFVIII subtopic has always managed to maintain its high quality. Once more subtopics are produced I believe this main topic will become more easily manageable. Kariteh ( talk) 16:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • I don't think this is too huge to work. Once each games gets a GA or FA, demotions should be rare, and it isn't asking too much to get each new game in the main series up to GA when they are released every other year. -- Arctic Gnome ( talkcontribs) 17:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove This topic was already kept once because of Gerrymandering. Z gin der 2008-06-10T18:15Z ( UTC)
  • Remove. I'm sad to say it, but this topic does not currently meet the criteria. I do believe, however, it can be renominated quite quickly, and I'm planning on getting FFVII to at least GA status. When the next candidacy is up, I would like to see FFX-2 and Mystic Quest removed, as they are not part to the main series. The Prince ( talk) 19:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • Well, I don't think anyone is ever happy to vote for the removal of an FT... Kariteh ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove LuciferMorgan ( talk) 11:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove Two of its articles are below good article status. Martarius ( talk) 08:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Remove per criterion 3. – thedemonhog talkedits 21:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Close as consensus to remove -- Arctic Gnome ( talkcontribs) 17:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook