Replying as the original nominator for both the GT and the editor who took the ECS article to GA too. Yep, I agree with the removal of the GT. The ECS was my first GA and I wasn't fully up to speed on Wiki processes. I reached a point where I felt that it was setting a bad example for GAs and so I had it removed. I'm afraid I haven't really got any interest in working on it again to take it back to GA as it needs a total overhaul in order to be cited with reliable sources.
Miyagawa (
talk) 08:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Replying as the original nominator for both the GT and the editor who took the ECS article to GA too. Yep, I agree with the removal of the GT. The ECS was my first GA and I wasn't fully up to speed on Wiki processes. I reached a point where I felt that it was setting a bad example for GAs and so I had it removed. I'm afraid I haven't really got any interest in working on it again to take it back to GA as it needs a total overhaul in order to be cited with reliable sources.
Miyagawa (
talk) 08:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply