From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Video game consoles (seventh generation)

Main page Articles
Video game consoles (seventh generation) Nintendo DS - PlayStation Portable - PlayStation 3 - Xbox 360 - Wii

Obviously, I am nominating this topic for Featured Topic. I see that it meets all requirements, but feel free to leave any suggestions or things in need of improvement. I will try to fix it as quick as possible. -- haha169 ( talk) 23:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Support - looks good. Though I'd just call the topic "Video game consoles (seventh generation)" and miss out the history bit if I were you - rst20xx ( talk) 13:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Reply - Ya, thats a good idea. I wanted to keep the article's name, but it would be less awkward your way. I've changed it.-- haha169 ( talk) 21:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Support In response to Gary King, no, they and not well defined, but these five are the only big ones. Z gin der 2008-06-05T13:02Z ( UTC)
    • Yes, that's true. There is a huge list of remakes and other seventh gen. consoles, but most people don't even know them. The big five are good enough. It doesn't break criteria 1(d) because it isn't an obvious or notable gap. -- haha169 ( talk) 19:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • OpposeSupport - I really really hate to do this, but there needs to at least be an explanation as to why all the systems in the "7th generation" category are not included here. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • The main article only lists the others at the bottom and never discusses them. Z gin der 2008-06-07T01:17Z ( UTC)
      • Judge, it doesn't break criteria 1(d) because it isn't an obvious or notable gap. Nobody knows about those systems listed on the bottom, unless they actually check out the main article. I never even knew about those until I began editing the seventh gen. article. All the main consoles are listed, and that should enough. -- haha169 ( talk) 03:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply
        • I agree that there is an obvious gap, but Haha169, I think you need to back it up with a citation, in the main article's introduction I guess. That'll deal with any complaints, and hopefully one should be easy enough to find - rst20xx ( talk) 10:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I think so, we can add the other systems when they reach GA status :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks, Judge. Sorry for replying as an IP, but I'm having problems logging in on a Chinese server. But I appreciate your work. Thanks! -- 222.35.61.194 ( talk) 08:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Video game consoles (seventh generation)

Main page Articles
Video game consoles (seventh generation) Nintendo DS - PlayStation Portable - PlayStation 3 - Xbox 360 - Wii

Obviously, I am nominating this topic for Featured Topic. I see that it meets all requirements, but feel free to leave any suggestions or things in need of improvement. I will try to fix it as quick as possible. -- haha169 ( talk) 23:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Support - looks good. Though I'd just call the topic "Video game consoles (seventh generation)" and miss out the history bit if I were you - rst20xx ( talk) 13:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Reply - Ya, thats a good idea. I wanted to keep the article's name, but it would be less awkward your way. I've changed it.-- haha169 ( talk) 21:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Support In response to Gary King, no, they and not well defined, but these five are the only big ones. Z gin der 2008-06-05T13:02Z ( UTC)
    • Yes, that's true. There is a huge list of remakes and other seventh gen. consoles, but most people don't even know them. The big five are good enough. It doesn't break criteria 1(d) because it isn't an obvious or notable gap. -- haha169 ( talk) 19:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) reply
  • OpposeSupport - I really really hate to do this, but there needs to at least be an explanation as to why all the systems in the "7th generation" category are not included here. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC) reply
    • The main article only lists the others at the bottom and never discusses them. Z gin der 2008-06-07T01:17Z ( UTC)
      • Judge, it doesn't break criteria 1(d) because it isn't an obvious or notable gap. Nobody knows about those systems listed on the bottom, unless they actually check out the main article. I never even knew about those until I began editing the seventh gen. article. All the main consoles are listed, and that should enough. -- haha169 ( talk) 03:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply
        • I agree that there is an obvious gap, but Haha169, I think you need to back it up with a citation, in the main article's introduction I guess. That'll deal with any complaints, and hopefully one should be easy enough to find - rst20xx ( talk) 10:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I think so, we can add the other systems when they reach GA status :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks, Judge. Sorry for replying as an IP, but I'm having problems logging in on a Chinese server. But I appreciate your work. Thanks! -- 222.35.61.194 ( talk) 08:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook