U-27 class submarines

| discuss

U-27 class submarines

9 articles

SM U-27

SM U-28

SM U-29

SM U-30

SM U-31

SM U-32

SM U-40

SM U-41

Major contributors: Bellhalla

The latest Good Topic nomination for an Austro-Hungarian submarine class. I believe that all of the requirements are fulfilled. — Bellhalla ( talk) 22:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply

• Support - excellent work that I have watched grow over the last few months.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 23:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support - so let me get this straight. With this nom and the ones already passed, you'll have done sub nos 1-12, 20-23, 27-32 and 40-41. U-13 seems to be nonexistant and U-14 is in a class of its own so basically done. Wait hang on a sec... are there two U-10s and two U-11s? rst20xx ( talk) 23:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
  • There are five U-10 class subs, one + the class page are GA now (two more are at GAN, with two more to follow in the next day or so). My current plot to take over GTC can be seen here… Mwa-ha-ha-ha… — Bellhalla ( talk) 00:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
    • No I mean, what about SM U-69 and SM U-70? Are they not U-10 and U-11 respectively also? Workpage looks good though, I've never seen so many subtopic links, it's glorious! rst20xx ( talk) 07:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
      • I see now. A-H ordered 5 subs, provisionally numbered U-7 to U-11, but sold them to Germany before they were complete (and they became Germany's U-66 to U-70). Since none were ever commissioned by A-H, U-10 and U-11 were reused for two subs bought from Germany. So, there was only one commissioned sub named U-10 or U-11. — Bellhalla ( talk) 13:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support - with the provision that you and I never end up in the same WikiCup pool ;) Once again, superb work! Cam ^{( Chat)} 23:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support keep 'em coming. Nergaal ( talk) 00:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support stealing Cam's reason (I wouldn't make it out of that pool alive) — Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 00:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support Nice work, Belhalla. Parsecboy ( talk) 00:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support - Nice work as always Bellhalla. - MBK ₀₀₄ 01:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support -- Meets WP:WIAFT.-- TRU CO 02:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx ( talk) 17:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply