Having succeeded with a genus FT previously, an entire subfamily this time, albeit with just two members. I'm aiming for GT, and the three articles are all at GA. The articles ahave the same layout and a navbox. Inevitably, there's a certain amount of overlap, but I've tried to incorporate some different bits into each article. Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me?17:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support: I like the animal genus/subfamily topics, they fit so well in the "tree" structure of a Ftopic or Gtopic. --PresN15:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support - nice topic, I find it interesting the m in Martin is capitalised in the species name but not the subfamily, never noticed that before -
rst20xx (
talk)
03:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment - can you create a book on this topic? Just click on the link in the top left of the topic box and create a book there, copying the formatting used in other existing books -
rst20xx (
talk)
20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Having succeeded with a genus FT previously, an entire subfamily this time, albeit with just two members. I'm aiming for GT, and the three articles are all at GA. The articles ahave the same layout and a navbox. Inevitably, there's a certain amount of overlap, but I've tried to incorporate some different bits into each article. Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me?17:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support: I like the animal genus/subfamily topics, they fit so well in the "tree" structure of a Ftopic or Gtopic. --PresN15:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support - nice topic, I find it interesting the m in Martin is capitalised in the species name but not the subfamily, never noticed that before -
rst20xx (
talk)
03:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment - can you create a book on this topic? Just click on the link in the top left of the topic box and create a book there, copying the formatting used in other existing books -
rst20xx (
talk)
20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)reply