Oppose and as a comment, you're right, I hadn't even noticed the peer reviews for the articles to do with Slipknot weren't finished. I shall go and switch my vote to oppose for that one, too. And as a comment, I personally will oppose the inclusion of any -articles until they've been nominated for GA, and failed solely due to inherent shortness. i.e., I want a very literal demonstration that these articles cannot pass GA -
rst20xx (
talk)
13:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - You need to either get the two check marked articles to Good Article status or merge them, because they are not "unreleased items" or articles will a big potential for future growth.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk)
16:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I guess this should be considered On hold until the GACs/PRs have all finished, at which point the nom will effectively be able to start properly -
rst20xx (
talk)
01:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote - Things have been a bit slow around here lately and I appologise for that. However, promotions are meant to stay open for 10 days, and in this case, only yesterday was that limit effectively met -
rst20xx (
talk)
10:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose and as a comment, you're right, I hadn't even noticed the peer reviews for the articles to do with Slipknot weren't finished. I shall go and switch my vote to oppose for that one, too. And as a comment, I personally will oppose the inclusion of any -articles until they've been nominated for GA, and failed solely due to inherent shortness. i.e., I want a very literal demonstration that these articles cannot pass GA -
rst20xx (
talk)
13:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - You need to either get the two check marked articles to Good Article status or merge them, because they are not "unreleased items" or articles will a big potential for future growth.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk)
16:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I guess this should be considered On hold until the GACs/PRs have all finished, at which point the nom will effectively be able to start properly -
rst20xx (
talk)
01:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote - Things have been a bit slow around here lately and I appologise for that. However, promotions are meant to stay open for 10 days, and in this case, only yesterday was that limit effectively met -
rst20xx (
talk)
10:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)reply