Procedural nomination; it used to be a Featured Topic until it was demoted in 2010. I noticed that Cool, the reason why it was demoted, became a Good Article back in November and is now nominating it.
GamerPro6418:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose The Rich Girl article should not be an FA, there are lots of cases of
WP:OR in multiple sections and there are mistakes in the references, thus it shouldn't become an FA topic.
Calvin •
NaNaNaC'mon!17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose I'm concerned with the Original Research in Holla and Rich, particularly in the music and lyrics section where there are analyses of the sheet music itself. FA before was not that strict, unlike today. --
Efe (
talk)
04:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I'm sorry but all these "FA" articles violate GA criteria let alone FA. NFCC issues, OR issues, LEAD issues, MOS issues in abundance. I think a reassessment of each is needed. -
(CK)Lakeshade -
talk2me -
06:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Procedural nomination; it used to be a Featured Topic until it was demoted in 2010. I noticed that Cool, the reason why it was demoted, became a Good Article back in November and is now nominating it.
GamerPro6418:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose The Rich Girl article should not be an FA, there are lots of cases of
WP:OR in multiple sections and there are mistakes in the references, thus it shouldn't become an FA topic.
Calvin •
NaNaNaC'mon!17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose I'm concerned with the Original Research in Holla and Rich, particularly in the music and lyrics section where there are analyses of the sheet music itself. FA before was not that strict, unlike today. --
Efe (
talk)
04:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I'm sorry but all these "FA" articles violate GA criteria let alone FA. NFCC issues, OR issues, LEAD issues, MOS issues in abundance. I think a reassessment of each is needed. -
(CK)Lakeshade -
talk2me -
06:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply