Jesus College, Oxford (2nd supplementary nomination)
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Jesus College, Oxford for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
The main alumni list has grown and spawned three sub-lists, all of which are now FLs in their own right, hence this supplementary topic nom.
BencherliteTalk 06:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not that there should be anything urgently needing my attention on this non-controversial supplementary nomination, but just to leave a note that I'm off Wikipedia for the next fortnight.
BencherliteTalk 18:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I support these additions somewhere but am going to throw out a suggestion. Because these 3 additional alumni FLs are so tightly connected with the main alumni list, might it be better to have a alumni subtopic of 4 lists. I know FTs should not be excessively subdivided, but I just thought I'd suggest it as those 4 lists clearly go together as a set. Good work on this!
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 22:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply
While both topics would be comprehensive within themselves, the total number of articles here is 9, hence I think this would break the "needlessly small" recommendation -- the only reason to split would be that it's more impressive which isn't really a reason IMO. I suppose there is another alumni topic so in a sense it seems a bit unfair that this topic doesn't get to be broken in two when that topic is one half of the resultant break, but if a USNA topic is brought up to scratch, and the number of articles is such that one merged topic wouldn't be too big, I would advocate merging there, too -
rst20xx (
talk) 23:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Jesus College, Oxford (2nd supplementary nomination)
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Jesus College, Oxford for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
The main alumni list has grown and spawned three sub-lists, all of which are now FLs in their own right, hence this supplementary topic nom.
BencherliteTalk 06:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Not that there should be anything urgently needing my attention on this non-controversial supplementary nomination, but just to leave a note that I'm off Wikipedia for the next fortnight.
BencherliteTalk 18:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I support these additions somewhere but am going to throw out a suggestion. Because these 3 additional alumni FLs are so tightly connected with the main alumni list, might it be better to have a alumni subtopic of 4 lists. I know FTs should not be excessively subdivided, but I just thought I'd suggest it as those 4 lists clearly go together as a set. Good work on this!
Rambo's Revenge(talk) 22:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply
While both topics would be comprehensive within themselves, the total number of articles here is 9, hence I think this would break the "needlessly small" recommendation -- the only reason to split would be that it's more impressive which isn't really a reason IMO. I suppose there is another alumni topic so in a sense it seems a bit unfair that this topic doesn't get to be broken in two when that topic is one half of the resultant break, but if a USNA topic is brought up to scratch, and the number of articles is such that one merged topic wouldn't be too big, I would advocate merging there, too -
rst20xx (
talk) 23:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)reply