I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. --
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support All the articles on this division's major sub-units and operations are of GA standard - great work Jim.
Nick-D (
talk) 08:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support What can I say? Simply exemplary.
Sp33dyphil"
Adastra" 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Superb. Superb.
Buggie111 (
talk) 14:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment articles are free of disambiguation links. all external links seem to be working.
Alt text however, is in dire need of attention. In most of the articles. Not a reason to object, but since we're paying attention to the topic, might a well keep our readers with visual difficulties in mind. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 18:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
All geoocordinates added except for Operation Turkey Buzzard which covered 3,200 miles from England to North Africa. If required can you suggest where its located?
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 19:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Can't say I do. It's just something I noticed when checking the articles. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 20:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I'd suggest the LZ in Tunisia, if that's possible.
Buggie111 (
talk) 20:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok done as suggested by Buggie111
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 20:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Bad referencing in certain placesReflinks is trying to change several named references. This is usually do to a mismatch, such as using "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.158</ref>" in one place, and "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.156</ref>" in the other. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 19:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Minor styling issue, some of the references are listed as "Peters and Buist" while others are listed as "Shortt & McBride" (see e.g.
4th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)). One style should be picked and stuck with on all the articles. Likewise for "p.83" and "p. 145".Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 20:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Does anyone see this kind of inconsistency within a single article? - Dank (
push to talk) 21:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support (Disclaimer - main contributor to the Battle of Arnhem article).
Ranger SteveTalk 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support A great example of a GT.
Zangar (
talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Excellent work all around. Keep it up!
Parsecboy (
talk) 12:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there?
Sven ManguardWha? 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
OK I have changed a <ref name=ferg15/> to <ref name=ferg15>Ferguson, p15</ref> which seem to have fixed it.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Yep, that's got it, well done!
Zangar (
talk) 11:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Excellent and well-organised coverage of a focused topic area. (Disclaimer: I copy-edited two of these articles for GA.) --
Demiurge1000 (
talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support I've reviewed many of these for GA, and am happy to say they are a great set of articles.
Rubycomment! 20:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support, with a minor caveat that I'm disappointed the plot summaries aren't ever sourced. There are so many sources out there that could provide non-viewers a chance to have an objective summary of each episode, instead of relying on the episode itself for the source. --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk) 02:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)reply
I am nominating this for a good topic because I think it meets the criteria. All six articles are GA. I'm not sure if
The M+M's Tour should be included though, but I consider it to be part of the background of the album.
Xwomanizerx (
talk) 18:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Looks good to me.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 18:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Looks good. But I'm not sure about the tour though, as it wasn't really in support of the album. It was just kind of a random thing that she decided to do. —
Status {talkcontribs 01:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)reply
CommentAlt text on this topic is in some need of attention. While it's not a reason to oppose, might as well take the FTC as an opportunity to think of our visually impaired readers. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 04:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Added alt text to all the articles of the topic.
Xwomanizerx (
talk) 04:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Closed with consensus to promote as good topic.Jim Sweeney (
talk) 16:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
A class of five German heavy cruisers built shortly before World War II, only three were completed. Prinz Eugen is probably the most famous, as she was
Bismarck's consort on her only mission. This group of ships may eventually be integrated into
a larger topic and a <pipe dream>
Cruisers of Germany topic similar to the recently promoted
Battleships of Germany topic</pipe dream>.
Parsecboy (
talk) 19:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
It's been taken care of.
Parsecboy (
talk) 02:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)reply
CommentAlt text is in some need of attention. Not a reason to oppose, but since the topic is getting scrutiny, might as well think of our readers with visual disabilities. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 18:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Topic meets the criteria.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 20:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
The topic covers all of the episodes produced and aired during the Road to series of the animated comedy series Family Guy. I would like to promote this topic to good topic, as I believe it meets all of the criteria. --
Gage (
talk) 04:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Reviewed two of these for GA; and have read through the others, which are also of suitable quality.
GRAPPLEX 07:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Done.
Gage (
talk) 23:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Inspecting the external links reveal some problem with those of
Road to... (Family Guy) and
Road to Rhode Island. They seem to be referencing Google searches or something. See the book report ("Ext Links" tool) for details. There might be other issues with references to Film.com as well. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 01:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Done.
Gage (
talk) 07:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. --
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support All the articles on this division's major sub-units and operations are of GA standard - great work Jim.
Nick-D (
talk) 08:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support What can I say? Simply exemplary.
Sp33dyphil"
Adastra" 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Superb. Superb.
Buggie111 (
talk) 14:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment articles are free of disambiguation links. all external links seem to be working.
Alt text however, is in dire need of attention. In most of the articles. Not a reason to object, but since we're paying attention to the topic, might a well keep our readers with visual difficulties in mind. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 18:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
All geoocordinates added except for Operation Turkey Buzzard which covered 3,200 miles from England to North Africa. If required can you suggest where its located?
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 19:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Can't say I do. It's just something I noticed when checking the articles. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 20:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I'd suggest the LZ in Tunisia, if that's possible.
Buggie111 (
talk) 20:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok done as suggested by Buggie111
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 20:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Bad referencing in certain placesReflinks is trying to change several named references. This is usually do to a mismatch, such as using "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.158</ref>" in one place, and "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.156</ref>" in the other. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 19:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Minor styling issue, some of the references are listed as "Peters and Buist" while others are listed as "Shortt & McBride" (see e.g.
4th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)). One style should be picked and stuck with on all the articles. Likewise for "p.83" and "p. 145".Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 20:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Does anyone see this kind of inconsistency within a single article? - Dank (
push to talk) 21:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support (Disclaimer - main contributor to the Battle of Arnhem article).
Ranger SteveTalk 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support A great example of a GT.
Zangar (
talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Excellent work all around. Keep it up!
Parsecboy (
talk) 12:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there?
Sven ManguardWha? 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
OK I have changed a <ref name=ferg15/> to <ref name=ferg15>Ferguson, p15</ref> which seem to have fixed it.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Yep, that's got it, well done!
Zangar (
talk) 11:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Excellent and well-organised coverage of a focused topic area. (Disclaimer: I copy-edited two of these articles for GA.) --
Demiurge1000 (
talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support I've reviewed many of these for GA, and am happy to say they are a great set of articles.
Rubycomment! 20:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support, with a minor caveat that I'm disappointed the plot summaries aren't ever sourced. There are so many sources out there that could provide non-viewers a chance to have an objective summary of each episode, instead of relying on the episode itself for the source. --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk) 02:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)reply
I am nominating this for a good topic because I think it meets the criteria. All six articles are GA. I'm not sure if
The M+M's Tour should be included though, but I consider it to be part of the background of the album.
Xwomanizerx (
talk) 18:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Looks good to me.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 18:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Looks good. But I'm not sure about the tour though, as it wasn't really in support of the album. It was just kind of a random thing that she decided to do. —
Status {talkcontribs 01:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)reply
CommentAlt text on this topic is in some need of attention. While it's not a reason to oppose, might as well take the FTC as an opportunity to think of our visually impaired readers. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 04:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Added alt text to all the articles of the topic.
Xwomanizerx (
talk) 04:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Closed with consensus to promote as good topic.Jim Sweeney (
talk) 16:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
A class of five German heavy cruisers built shortly before World War II, only three were completed. Prinz Eugen is probably the most famous, as she was
Bismarck's consort on her only mission. This group of ships may eventually be integrated into
a larger topic and a <pipe dream>
Cruisers of Germany topic similar to the recently promoted
Battleships of Germany topic</pipe dream>.
Parsecboy (
talk) 19:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)reply
It's been taken care of.
Parsecboy (
talk) 02:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)reply
CommentAlt text is in some need of attention. Not a reason to oppose, but since the topic is getting scrutiny, might as well think of our readers with visual disabilities. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 18:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Topic meets the criteria.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 20:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
The topic covers all of the episodes produced and aired during the Road to series of the animated comedy series Family Guy. I would like to promote this topic to good topic, as I believe it meets all of the criteria. --
Gage (
talk) 04:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - Reviewed two of these for GA; and have read through the others, which are also of suitable quality.
GRAPPLEX 07:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Done.
Gage (
talk) 23:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Inspecting the external links reveal some problem with those of
Road to... (Family Guy) and
Road to Rhode Island. They seem to be referencing Google searches or something. See the book report ("Ext Links" tool) for details. There might be other issues with references to Film.com as well. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books} 01:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Done.
Gage (
talk) 07:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)reply