Question - What will happen to the series article once the list is brought back up to FL? Will it remain the main article, be moved to a regular article of the topic, or removed? (
Guyinblack25talk18:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Yes, I was asking what will happen to the series article once "List of Final Fantasy titles" is brought back up to FL? Will the Final Fantasy series article remain the main article for the topic after "List of Final Fantasy titles" is brought back up to FL? (
Guyinblack25talk21:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Since the topic features only game titles (and FF has a lot to offer: music, movies, TV series and gameplay-related articles), I think we don't need to change the name.
igordebraga≠17:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose - I see why you are doing this, but I think it would be better to just get the existing main article back up to Fl status. It seems to me that a topic with
Final Fantasy as the main article should include (for example) an article on the history of the series and an article on its cultural impact. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs)
18:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)reply
If I may ask, why would separate articles on the history and cultural impact be required? I know those may have been arbitrary examples, but other video game topics don't have similar articles and such information is already covered in the main series article. (
Guyinblack25talk19:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Looking back, I guess precident has been set to allow a topic organized like this. In fact, once the list is brought back up to FL status, you could include it as a member of the topic, since the Mary Wollstonecraft topic has a timeline in it. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs)
16:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Question - What will happen to the series article once the list is brought back up to FL? Will it remain the main article, be moved to a regular article of the topic, or removed? (
Guyinblack25talk18:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Yes, I was asking what will happen to the series article once "List of Final Fantasy titles" is brought back up to FL? Will the Final Fantasy series article remain the main article for the topic after "List of Final Fantasy titles" is brought back up to FL? (
Guyinblack25talk21:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Since the topic features only game titles (and FF has a lot to offer: music, movies, TV series and gameplay-related articles), I think we don't need to change the name.
igordebraga≠17:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose - I see why you are doing this, but I think it would be better to just get the existing main article back up to Fl status. It seems to me that a topic with
Final Fantasy as the main article should include (for example) an article on the history of the series and an article on its cultural impact. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs)
18:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)reply
If I may ask, why would separate articles on the history and cultural impact be required? I know those may have been arbitrary examples, but other video game topics don't have similar articles and such information is already covered in the main series article. (
Guyinblack25talk19:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC))reply
Looking back, I guess precident has been set to allow a topic organized like this. In fact, once the list is brought back up to FL status, you could include it as a member of the topic, since the Mary Wollstonecraft topic has a timeline in it. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs)
16:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)reply