Main article is album. First 3 (L&R, IDR, NS) are singles released from the album, while Black Tears is a notable song (heavy press coverage, etc.). There is the possibility of another single being released, but it's not likely (IMO). Fully formatted version at
User:Rm w a vu/Dream Days FT. Cheers,
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Support It appears to meet all of the criteria.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 13:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Neutral. I'm leaning towards oppose, as the only other album FT has
all sub-articles FAed. Not sure if this should be uniform among future album FTs (i.e. this one), so I'm leaving this open to discussion.
NSR77TC 23:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply
There isn't enough content available to FA the other articles, IMO. The
criteria doesn't say how many FAs are needed for a group of 5, so I guess it's up to each of us to make up our own mind. dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 00:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The criteria says that a topic of three needs two featured articles/lists and a topic of nine needs three, using logic it would seem that this would only need two.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 02:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - Meets the criteria as far as I can see. Does this topic have a picture in mind?
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 13:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
It'd be great it we could, but I don't know what picture we could use that would be fair use that would appropriately suit the FT. Any suggestions would be happily welcomed, though. --
rm 'w avu 08:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - I created the FT, but wasn't sure if it was quite ready. I do now, though, having thought it through and re-reviewing each article for its merits, and compounding that, each article in the topic is at least GA, and we meet the at least 2 rule. If this topic reaches 9 articles, then I'd be careful to ensure that we at least have a third FA. From what we have here, Lost and Running, Nobody Sees and Black Tears are all potentially able to be promoted to FA, but none needs to to meet FT criteria. --
rm 'w avu 08:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Conditional support, providing "City..." gets FA and "The Principle and the Pauper" gets GA. Will(
talk) 20:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)reply
My weak mathematical skills are telling me you don't have enough FAs at the moment.
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 06:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The Simpsons (season 8) passed with 1 FL and 2 FAs, the exact same number as this one currently has. --
Scorpion0422 15:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
In the long run, there will (hopefully) be a couple other FAs in addition to the ongoing
WP:FAC for
The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson - including
The Last Temptation of Krust, and
The Principal and the Pauper. Granted that shouldn't be taken under consideration for this discussion, but I just thought it should be noted, that whether or not this topic passes, most likely in a few months in addition to the
WP:FL, there will be a total of (5)
WP:FAs.
Cirt (
talk) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
It's at the low end of FAs, but for such a large topic 4 FAs and the rest GAs is fairly impressive. As per precedent, this should be acceptable. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 16:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)reply
OK, I'm happy with that (I don't know much about precedent here). It would be nice to have more FAs, as per Cirt. Support.
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 08:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)reply
conditional support all current FAC/GACs would have to be successful.
David Fuchs (
talk) 15:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
OpposeAbstaining A topic should not be nominated until it passes all of the required Good article and Featured Article processes.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 02:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)reply
For the record Season 8 only passed after all the articles were GA or higher.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 19:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
And they all are for Season 9, save for
The Principal and the Pauper, which is currently at
WP:GAC and will (hopefully) be reviewed and listed as a GA soon.
Cirt (
talk) 19:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Could they have waited? Sure, but they're here now and "The Principal and the Pauper" will probably be promoted to GA. –thedemonhogtalk •
edits 02:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
To set the record straight,
My Sister, My Sitter wasn't even a GAC when we nominated season 8, but it was promoted after a couple of weeks. --
Scorpion0422 03:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
I am changing my vote to abstain, as I have no reason to oppose anymore, but dislike the conflict of interest, and similar things, I think might have been used.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 18:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Just to clarify, I do not feel comfortable voting support for this, but I have no complaints to oppose. I do not have any accusation against anyone.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 01:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Note - "The City of New York..." is now FA.
xihix(
talk) 01:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Main article is album. First 3 (L&R, IDR, NS) are singles released from the album, while Black Tears is a notable song (heavy press coverage, etc.). There is the possibility of another single being released, but it's not likely (IMO). Fully formatted version at
User:Rm w a vu/Dream Days FT. Cheers,
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Support It appears to meet all of the criteria.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 13:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Neutral. I'm leaning towards oppose, as the only other album FT has
all sub-articles FAed. Not sure if this should be uniform among future album FTs (i.e. this one), so I'm leaving this open to discussion.
NSR77TC 23:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply
There isn't enough content available to FA the other articles, IMO. The
criteria doesn't say how many FAs are needed for a group of 5, so I guess it's up to each of us to make up our own mind. dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 00:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The criteria says that a topic of three needs two featured articles/lists and a topic of nine needs three, using logic it would seem that this would only need two.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 02:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - Meets the criteria as far as I can see. Does this topic have a picture in mind?
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 13:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
It'd be great it we could, but I don't know what picture we could use that would be fair use that would appropriately suit the FT. Any suggestions would be happily welcomed, though. --
rm 'w avu 08:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - I created the FT, but wasn't sure if it was quite ready. I do now, though, having thought it through and re-reviewing each article for its merits, and compounding that, each article in the topic is at least GA, and we meet the at least 2 rule. If this topic reaches 9 articles, then I'd be careful to ensure that we at least have a third FA. From what we have here, Lost and Running, Nobody Sees and Black Tears are all potentially able to be promoted to FA, but none needs to to meet FT criteria. --
rm 'w avu 08:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Conditional support, providing "City..." gets FA and "The Principle and the Pauper" gets GA. Will(
talk) 20:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)reply
My weak mathematical skills are telling me you don't have enough FAs at the moment.
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 06:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The Simpsons (season 8) passed with 1 FL and 2 FAs, the exact same number as this one currently has. --
Scorpion0422 15:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
In the long run, there will (hopefully) be a couple other FAs in addition to the ongoing
WP:FAC for
The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson - including
The Last Temptation of Krust, and
The Principal and the Pauper. Granted that shouldn't be taken under consideration for this discussion, but I just thought it should be noted, that whether or not this topic passes, most likely in a few months in addition to the
WP:FL, there will be a total of (5)
WP:FAs.
Cirt (
talk) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
It's at the low end of FAs, but for such a large topic 4 FAs and the rest GAs is fairly impressive. As per precedent, this should be acceptable. --
Arctic Gnome (
talk •
contribs) 16:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)reply
OK, I'm happy with that (I don't know much about precedent here). It would be nice to have more FAs, as per Cirt. Support.
DihydrogenMonoxide (
party) 08:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)reply
conditional support all current FAC/GACs would have to be successful.
David Fuchs (
talk) 15:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
OpposeAbstaining A topic should not be nominated until it passes all of the required Good article and Featured Article processes.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 02:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)reply
For the record Season 8 only passed after all the articles were GA or higher.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 19:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
And they all are for Season 9, save for
The Principal and the Pauper, which is currently at
WP:GAC and will (hopefully) be reviewed and listed as a GA soon.
Cirt (
talk) 19:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Could they have waited? Sure, but they're here now and "The Principal and the Pauper" will probably be promoted to GA. –thedemonhogtalk •
edits 02:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
To set the record straight,
My Sister, My Sitter wasn't even a GAC when we nominated season 8, but it was promoted after a couple of weeks. --
Scorpion0422 03:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
I am changing my vote to abstain, as I have no reason to oppose anymore, but dislike the conflict of interest, and similar things, I think might have been used.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 18:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Just to clarify, I do not feel comfortable voting support for this, but I have no complaints to oppose. I do not have any accusation against anyone.
Zginder (
talk) (
Contrib) 01:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Note - "The City of New York..." is now FA.
xihix(
talk) 01:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply